Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi, i have started using my nikon d50 with its 18 - 55mm lens and was wondering if anyone else had the same camera or similar and if they used telephoto lens???

im looking at buying one for wildlife shots. any idea what length?? was thinking 55 - 200 mm??

thanks, dave

post-26741-1234799750_thumb.jpg

post-26741-1234799768_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i have started using my nikon d50 with its 18 - 55mm lens and was wondering if anyone else had the same camera or similar and if they used telephoto lens???

im looking at buying one for wildlife shots. any idea what length?? was thinking 55 - 200 mm??

thanks, dave

 

1st picture is nice. so is the 2nd ofcourse but the 1st is lovely

Link to post
Share on other sites
ive got a d80 with 55 200 sigma and 70 300 nikon

 

55 200 gets the most use good mid range lense

 

yeah i was looking at a sigma 55 200. they seem around the £100 mark so quite reasonable?

 

I used a sigma 18 - 200 mm lens on my old Nikon D50 with fairly good results - I think it cost me about £200 a year ago, but I'm sure the price of them has come down quite a bit since - in fact Im sure it was in Jessops for about £99 not long ago. I sometimes use the same lens on my new camera (Nikon D90).

 

Edited to add, must have been seeing things :rolleyes: its £229 in Jessops at the moment

http://www.jessops.com/online.store/catego...73539/Show.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son uses my Nikon 70-300mm, and he gets some very good shots, the lense however has not got VR, and if I was ever going to get similar, it would have VR on it, it can make all the difference, it will however be more expensive. Most of us cant afford what we, as wildlife photography enthusiasts should have lense wise..a fast piece of quality glass..

 

Here are some lense reviews for Nikon lenses..http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikkor.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites
i quite like the sound of the 18-200 cuz i will not always have a tripod so am thinking i will still be able to use it whereas a 70 - will need one all the time?? am i right in thinking this??

 

Yeahh, maybe your right....

Think I might invest in one of those tripod thingys...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not as rich as you Martin, my 70-300mm hasnt got VR, if I got another zoom that size it deffo would have..I only shoot wildlife photographs, and VR for me is a godsend, everything I shoot is handheld, with a few pics taken resting on a beanbag on my car window

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...