dogman89 0 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 the rspca have made it official. they want an end to bsl http://www.petparliament.com/viewarticle.p...d=15&aid=95 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ginga john 268 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 (edited) And about time too, these wank#rs were instrumental in the worst bit of legislation in years, now cos it will get them a mention they want to go back again. tossers one and all but good news none the less Edited January 8, 2009 by ginga john Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mad al 146 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 bet there's a lot of very happy dachshund owners out there now then Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dogman89 0 Posted January 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 bet there's a lot of very happy dachshund owners out there now then yeah cause theyre the reason the ban came into force Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Does anyone think that they'll replace it with anything that's actually owner friendly? Smell the f*****g coffee... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
COMPO 54 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 (edited) bet there's a lot of very happy dachshund owners out there now then Yeah i'm well happy! It is a draconian piece of law.......we need to revert to deed not breed..........especially as they tried to legislate against a type rather than a defineable breed....leaving it open to interpretation! a dangerous dog is a dog that is dangerous, because of its behaviour rather than what it looks like! Chris I prefer Tea...white no sugar Edited January 9, 2009 by COMPO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PAUL73 0 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 wont change a thing not with them wankers they will have it turn out they have more rights or something Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chainman 8 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 the rspca have made it official. they want an end to bsl http://www.petparliament.com/viewarticle.p...d=15&aid=95 about time to its just a shame its took some good innocent dogs getting put down before this happened hope it comes in asap Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sue 1 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 carnt believe what ive read ,the r s p c a want to do something right ,ive never believed a certain breed should be classed all because a certain few ,each dog individually should be distroyed if it turns out to be dangerous Quote Link to post Share on other sites
swamper 11 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 the way i see that now is that they can take any dog instead f a pittbull type........the removal of that law will suit them fine Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strong Stuff 2,171 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 the way i see that now is that they can take any dog instead f a pittbull type........the removal of that law will suit them fine My thought exactly, my guess is that they have been frustrated by the amount of dogs being returned to owners after court appeals as not of "type". Got a feeling owners of working dogs are going to be in for a rough ride. I'd hope we don't look back and wish we'd been able to keep the DDA Quote Link to post Share on other sites
val 0 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 the way i see that now is that they can take any dog instead f a pittbull type........the removal of that law will suit them fine My thought exactly, my guess is that they have been frustrated by the amount of dogs being returned to owners after court appeals as not of "type". Got a feeling owners of working dogs are going to be in for a rough ride. I'd hope we don't look back and wish we'd been able to keep the DDA will they not have to prove that it is a danger to people now before they put the dog to sleep no matter what breed it is ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOPPER 1,809 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 you c an bet if the rspca are involed with it it will be even worse than the DDA they ll want imense powers to sieze any dog for any silly reason, god help the working dog now Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jakepotjo 3 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 if it comes out that they have to make shur the dog is dangerous dose that mean if you have a pit or tosa if its friendly you can have it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Something's not quite right here. Does anybody else think that they want a change in the law so that they can seize any breed of dog, not just ones currently covered by the BSL? What exactly constitutes a 'dangerous dog' in their eyes? A dog that's only dangerous to humans, or might it include a dog which might be considered dangerous to wildlife...? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.