Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 not wanting an arguement,but just thought maybe an idea for the admin,mods on here to tell us what happens when the authoritys contact you over members and or their activtiys on this site what are you by law having to tell them.iv heard they have been in touch with ian b before,cant remember why or the out come,just thought it may sharpen a few minds if it was explained what by law you have to tell,show,give the police. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
justin 2 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 very good idea nitevision, might make some people think twice about braggin or showing incriminating photos...that way we can protect ourselves from the police and the anti's...look forward to the explanation......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chimp 299 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 well i would presume the owner of a site would have to give up information or wouldnt they get in the shit ? the disclaimer is there for a reason and that is to protect the owner of the site in question. i think with all what has happened maybe people should think twice about the dreaded pre ban photo's Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mouse 282 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 if a lot of people thought before they posted on here then there would be no reason for these sort of questions to be asked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littletimmy 71 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Smartest thing you've posted on here nv.. keep up the hard work lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Smartest thing you've posted on here nv.. keep up the hard work lol lol timmy you shot that lazy dog yet? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littletimmy 71 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Smartest thing you've posted on here nv.. keep up the hard work lol lol timmy you shot that lazy dog yet? No still trying to convince myself of otherwise Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 im askin what the people who run the site have to divulge by law,not what or who the police are asking about, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Scuba1 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 if a lot of people thought before they posted on here then there would be no reason for these sort of questions to be asked. |Wise words indeed could not have put that better myself :clapper: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 (edited) if a lot of people thought before they posted on here then there would be no reason for these sort of questions to be asked. |Wise words indeed could not have put that better myself :clapper: yes but they dont so lets have it spelt out,like i have said its not to cause grief,let everyone be told what can happen.simple question simple answer for simple folk Edited January 7, 2009 by nitevision Quote Link to post Share on other sites
john b 38 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 I am speaking as an individual here - not on behalf of the site or anything. But I'd speculate that it's covered by the Data Protection Act to some extent and maybe would require a warrant. I don't really know. To be honest though it's far more likely that anyone wanting to make a prosecution case would simply use the information some people freely post on here to 'catch you in the act' as it were. That along with the exif-data in the photos that get posted which give a whole heap of info about the time, date, camera etc. See here http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/index...showtopic=34353 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MY LAW Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 (edited) I am speaking as an individual here - not on behalf of the site or anything.But I'd speculate that it's covered by the Data Protection Act to some extent and maybe would require a warrant. I don't really know. To be honest though it's far more likely that anyone wanting to make a prosecution case would simply use the information some people freely post on here to 'catch you in the act' as it were. That along with the exif-data in the photos that get posted which give a whole heap of info about the time, date, camera etc. See here http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/index...showtopic=34353 and that is all they could do with any info of here ,[use it to help in your capture ]other wise a lot of people would have been in court already because of this site ,look how long it has been running. Edited January 7, 2009 by MY LAW Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 so in your personal opinion the they could gain enough information just through pictures posted,i am already aware of that,my question was/is what happens when the admin,mods of this site are asked questions by the police about members of this forum,and their posts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littletimmy 71 Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 (edited) Sorry to steal your post NV but got me thinking .. can they use just photographic evidence alone to gain a conviction? Can they use photographs to identify a dog? I.e if a dogs on something can they positively identify that with the live and kicking thing, in court like? What if you wasn't on the photo can it still be used against you if you own the dogs that have been identified on the photo(if photo ID'ing dogs can be done)? Can they gather info from printed photos, such as they can from electronic copies on the PC, camera, phone etc? and another thing after seeing a picture and then finding out the real story .. say you was just a messer who found an illigal quarry and thought it would be good to photo with your dog and the fox .. to give the impression the dog killed it even though it never .. Whose the onus on to prove this? Edited January 7, 2009 by littletimmy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.