dogs shot

[Guest SJM]

Bennybhoy is no anti I can assure you , just a genuine bloke who works his dogs hard

[Guest anonymous]

I'd like to know what really happened here, sounds to me like a lot of one-sided shit is being thrown around. At the end of the day this bloke shouldn't have been there, end of. Sorry if his dogs were shot but he should have known better, more control and the balls to come out his hiding place after the first shot ... whole story sounds like a load of shit though to be honest.

 

There also seem to be a lot of degenerates on this thread saying they'd burn his barns and kill his livestock. Ok, some of you may be that retarded to think this is acceptable but the rest of you jumping on the bandwagon and more than likely pimpley kids. The hilarious thing is that its obvious who you are, one minute its 'nice dog, how's it bred... i'm going to ask my mummy if i can have one for my birthday' and the next it replying to every topic going offering your 'advice and experiance', and 'i'd kill his sheep and burn his barns. Fine countryman you are, more like towney scum. Pathetic.

 

Aye...... you'll notice it was yer auld da here that was the first to raise his head above the the parap.. parapi......... first to stick up for the farmer!!! Yip, I don't follow the flow... although, probably do better if I did right enough...

[lurcher_lad09 0]

well i hink its sick nocking a dog off

[Lurcherlovr 0]

I would be severally off is someone shot my dogs, but I do think you have to think of the farmer, thats his livelihood, if someone was threatening your livelihood you would protect it, its just human nature, no matter how upsetting it is, you will just have to put it to experience, and concentrate on a new generation, and keep them dogs from scaring livestock.

[brock1 2]

well if the farmer can sit & whatch for 2 hours & then shoot 4 dogs when his mates come that makes it right. i dont think so that makes him a f**king n*B head in my eyes he had 2 hours that he could of give the lad a worning to control his dog or pay the price. no he watched 4 dog atack his sheep for 2 hours & done nowt untill he got back up of his mates with god knows how meany guns. if the farmer give a worning first i wouldnt be botherd & sead he done right to shoot the dogs even if they were mine. but to just sat & watched 4 dog attack his sheep for 2 hours & do nowt untill he got backup is just cowardly he just had to shout & us townies are being called retarded lol. actions speak louder than words so why didnt he act faster & fire his mouth off in the 2 hours he done nowt. if his barns got set on fire tuff he deserves no beter. act like coward with all his mates with gun & us townies sound like gangsters lol .he should get what he deserves when there not there. now i have only heard one side of the story just like everyone else. but if what has been sead is true then the only retard is this cowardly gagster farmer that sat for 2 hours watching his sheep being attact doing nowt untill his homeies came with the guns & had his back. someone sead us townies all sound like gangsters becose we would whant justice for his cowardly mob broutality lol.

Edited January 7, 2009 by brock1

[shamrock67 21]

Has anyone else noticed that the Shooters on this forum have been civilised and looked at both sides of the story unlike the dog men who have been acting all hard saying theyl kill the farmer and shag *shoot* (spelling mistake ) all his sheep when in reality they would be piss scared

 

[ASME IX 1]

IL THINK YOU WILL FIND THE FARMER HAS TO INFORM THE POLICE BEFORE HE PULLS THE TRIGGER ON A DOG WORYING SHEEP.IF HE WAS SO CALLED WATCHING FOR 2 HOURS HE PROB GOT PICS OF THE DOGS RUNNING THOUGH THE SHEEP (NOT WORRYING) AND USED THAT AS EVIDENCE TO BACK UP HIS ACTIONS.ID GO GET LEAGAL ADVICE BECAUSE POLICE FIRE ARMS UNIT DONT LIKE TRIGGER HAPPY POEPLE SHOOTING WILLY NILLY THINKING THEY ARE A LAW TO THEM SELF.WRONGFULL SHOOTING OF DOGS IS ALSO CRIMINAL DAMAGE!!!!

 

LIKE ITS BEEN SAID ALREADY MORE THAN ONE WAY TO SKIN A CAT

 

ASME9

[Headshot08 36]

Dont know the ins and outs of this he said she said story so I would not want to comment however

Managed to catch this in the field the other day This was alive when I took the photo

This would be the third in three days,as somebody has already said we are starting to lamb now over 1500 a stray dog in the field with yews in lamb = disaster try working all year on something then pulling aborted lambs

As a lot of people on here already know I have and have had Lurchers and terriers since I was a kid and have a great deal of respect for a lot of hunting people dont know what dog is if it is a dog is doing this,However if it is a Dog my approach has been contact the police and inform them of stock loss they are not intrested in the slightest just tell you claim on your insurance and you can shoot the dog if it is worrying stock, then your premiums go up also you have to pay to have any dead stock removed.

My approach is I will confront anyone on my land who is not invited there if they are dull enough to come back and I actually witnessed the dog worry stock well what would you do.

I personally dont think it is the bravest thing to do shooting the dog as it has done f**k all wrong it is the prick who let it off the lead that wants the slap,it is like lets go and kill the sheep,why not go and sort out the farmer the sheep has done f**k all wrong

 

 

that sheeps looks dead to me buddie judging by the glazing on its eyes?

 

Steve

Edited January 14, 2009 by Headshot08

[BenBhoy 4,706]

like mickb said - if they was my dogs it'd be last time twat shot anything as it's hard aim when your eating food through a straw.

[#1poacher 8]

hi i was threatend face to face by a landowner yrs ago coz a so called mate had told him that i had been going on his land. the so called mate told him the reg and colour and what type of car it was then told his gamekeeper pals to get me i went and recruited alot of mates of mine to sort this out although never come to blows

[dogs-n-natives 1,182]

I still think your mate has a winning case, tresspass, poaching, etc dosnt give the farmer the right to shoot the dogs!

Edited January 14, 2009 by dogs-n-natives

[ASME IX 1]

trespassing isnt a prosicutable offence its a civil matter.providing there has been no criminal damageto the land or live stock.

does any one know if there is a revised edition of the book fair game?

 

asme9

[Guest Bennybhoy]

Bennybhoy is no anti I can assure you , just a genuine bloke who works his dogs hard

cheers sarah.you and my auld pal too.get oot soon as the dogs are fit pal.

[littlefish 588]

I still think your mate has a winning case, tresspass, poaching, etc dosnt give the farmer the right to shoot the dogs!

 

 

I think you'll find a farmer does have the right to shoot the dogs if they are worrying his livestock, like it or not.

[dogs-n-natives 1,182]

I still think your mate has a winning case, tresspass, poaching, etc dosnt give the farmer the right to shoot the dogs!

 

 

I think you'll find a farmer does have the right to shoot the dogs if they are worrying his livestock, like it or not.

You might want to read what I have written again in an earlier post on this topic!!

 

Runforyourlife says the dogs WERE NOT WORRYING LIVESTOCK!!!!!!!! Therefore the farmer seems in the wrong to me!!