jimmy0211 2 Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 i read somewhere a while back that foxes make badger setts dirty so the badgers move out, where would you stand if you dug a sett that you knew foxes had overtaken? i know you aren't allowed to dig into a badger sett but would it then count as a fox sett? thanks in advance jim Quote Link to post
scent 509 Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 i wouldnt like to in the situation pal fair enough if ye get knicked tis only a fox but the law can prove it was a known badger sett then ye might be in hot water Quote Link to post
jimmy0211 2 Posted August 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 im not into digging was just unsure, thanks scent Quote Link to post
Guest SPIFF Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 FROM WHAT I CAN GATHER THE LAW STATES OR RECOGNISES A BADGER SETTE AS A HOLE IN THE GROUND WITH A BADGER IN IT.SO ITS BASED ON EVIDENCE OF BADGER ACTIVITY IN THE VICINITY AND OUTSIDE SETTE,EG.BEDDING DUNG PITS ETC. A REGISTERED SETTE IS DIFFERENT.AS FAR AS IM AWARE NO MATTER WHATS AT HOME EVIDENCE OR NOT ONCE IT BECOMES A REGISTERED SETTE IT REMAINS ILLEGAL TO DISTURB IT. I KNOW OF PLACES THAT WHERE ONCE THRIVING BADGER SETTES NOW NOTHING MORE THAN RABBIT BURROWS ALL CLOSED IN AND SPOIL AND BEDDING ALL TAKEN AWAY BY A STREAM.NOTHING WRONG CHECKING PLACES LIKE THIS AS LONG AS THEY SHOW NO SIGN OF CURRENT BADGER ACTIVITY. WITH THE BADGER LAWS THE BURDEN OF PROVE IS SHIFTED.SO YOUR NOT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BUT GUILTY IF SOMEONE SAYS THEY SEEN YOU ATTEMPT TO DISTURB A SETTE OR TAKE A BADGER FROM IT UNTIL YOU PROVE OTHERWISE. ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE SO YOUR SCREWED UNLESS YOU HAVE LEGAL AID OR ARE A MEMBER OF A FIELDSPORTS GROUP WITH INSURANCE. Quote Link to post
wink hound 0 Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 i would suggest who ever wrote that was an idiot..... its bollocks. Quote Link to post
Guest SPIFF Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 i would suggest who ever wrote that was an idiot..... its bollocks. OH RIGHT WHAT PART THEN,AS IM CURIOUS AS THIS HAS AKWAYS BEEN MY UNDERSTANDING BUT LOOK FORWARD TO BEING PUT RIGHT Quote Link to post
hue jeers 6 Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Spiff, I don't think Winkhound meant what you have put, if you look at the times of the posts they are a minute apart. Winkhound would take at least 15 minutes to read what you have put so it must be a reply to the first statement. Quote Link to post
Guest SPIFF Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 thanks mate ,if thats the case i apologise,but ill be disappointed as i was looking forward to another whole debate Quote Link to post
scent 509 Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 i would suggest who ever wrote that was an idiot..... its bollocks. whoever wrote what? Quote Link to post
wink hound 0 Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 (edited) i read somewhere a while back that foxes make badger setts dirty so the badgers move out, where would you stand if you dug a sett that you knew foxes had overtaken? i know you aren't allowed to dig into a badger sett but would it then count as a fox sett? thanks in advance jim Edited August 20, 2008 by wink hound Quote Link to post
OldNog 432 Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 I have often wondered this! I know of one particular bunch of holes that were caved in years ago by cattle but then excavated by charles and this year there was a litter of cubs there. How do you think this would work then considering that the majority had been re-excavated by charles? Could be worth getting in touch with one of those countryside legal people! Quote Link to post
Guest AngelicAcid Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 I have often wondered this! I know of one particular bunch of holes that were caved in years ago by cattle but then excavated by charles and this year there was a litter of cubs there. How do you think this would work then considering that the majority had been re-excavated by charles? Could be worth getting in touch with one of those countryside legal people! If the location in question was a registered place, would it not stay as that, having probably been there for a long period of time, with the chance of it being occupied by its original inhabitants, even if for just for a short time. Hope you understood that. Quote Link to post
scent 509 Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 i read somewhere a while back that foxes make badger setts dirty so the badgers move out, where would you stand if you dug a sett that you knew foxes had overtaken? i know you aren't allowed to dig into a badger sett but would it then count as a fox sett? thanks in advance jim sound wink i thought you were referring to my reply Quote Link to post
jimmy0211 2 Posted August 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 i read somewhere a while back that foxes make badger setts dirty so the badgers move out, where would you stand if you dug a sett that you knew foxes had overtaken? i know you aren't allowed to dig into a badger sett but would it then count as a fox sett? thanks in advance jim sound wink i thought you were referring to my reply so thats not true? Quote Link to post
Guest AngelicAcid Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Best thing to do is keep well away mate. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.