DOG LICENCE REINTRODUCTION

[Running 7]

complete waste of time pure money maker licence peddlers

[Kay 3,709]

Yep its a waste off time if you ask me

[shepp 2,285]

The way the government runs things i think you'll find ten quid would'nt even cover admin.

I would bet you'll be looking at a charge of fourty quid plus

[Malt 379]

Yet another hair brained scheme by the feckers to wring an extra couple of quid out of us.

 

 

Liked the one about the cats needing a licence Mars mate!

[Guest Ditch_Shitter]

Mars, there, is indeed spot on! Can ye imagine the, er ..... catastophe That would cause? Never in a month of sundays, sadly. The cat lobby would never stand for it.

 

Sue; I don't think it's got anything to do with checking if Mrs Feckle of Orchard Rd has a lisence for 'Suzy'. It'll just be a sly Malleous Malficarum for those seen or admitting to be harbouring anything 'They' don't like. Sort of a National Identity Card for Mouchers, Dog Fighters and Chavs. All ye addresses on their data bases. They'll know where ye live

 

Of course, next thing they'll bring in is the rider that, when presented at a vet's, ye'll have to produce the license pertaining to the Dog in question. Boosh! There's Another set of eyes and ears set to winkle out what ye have. Easy peasy, eh? No good trying to keep ye Dog away from the white coats baleful gaze either. Oh no. Arsepca suddenly turn up, " Acting on anonymous call. " ( ) and find ye suss looking Dog 1% or less possibly, 'In their own " Expert " opinion', under the weather? AWA, isn't it? Dog won't be there tomorrow.

 

We have Dog Licences here. I have a drawer full of the f*cking things. 12.50 Euro's a throw, I believe? Last a year. Supposed to buy one before ye take charge of the Dog. Worth noting though; Ours are transferrable with said Dog. So, if I buy a Dog off Pat, he can hand me it's license and my arse is covered to fetch it home.

 

Anyway, little more to say on the matter right now as I've only just come back here and found this Thread. Doesn't concern me, of course. But I'll watch developements with objective interest, as ever.

 

I'll certainly be interested to know what they'll let ye say ye Dog is. Most of mine are just down as " Cross Breed ", because they are. Girl actually asked me recently; ' Can ye not say What cross? '. I told her straight, " Listen, love: I have a Dog at home called 'Dingo'. He's called that because he Looks Like a bloody Dingo. If you can figure out what the hell's in his make up? Ye doing better at Dog Spotting than me! ".

 

Anyway, have to get ye thinking caps on now, won't ye? Arsepca / govt Vs. you lot. Let the chess tournament begin

 

It must be Great, living in that shit house called 'england'!

[Guest bitsa lurcher]

i have a suggesstion on dog licensing ........why not put the dog owners through a test , similar to a driving test , that way the person be tested could be asessed as to what kind of dog he or she could keep ........for example if you where to score say 25% result mark on your test then you would not qualify to own what is at present classed as a dangerous dog ....on the other hand if you scored 99% on your test then you could have what ever you liked ......all owners to carry a photo card license and all dogs to be micro chipped .......problem solved

[shotup 9]

fooking labour basterds taxing the poor again, next time you see a labour mp kick em right between the nuts and say this is how it feels. why dont they start saving money by scrapping the mp s allowances which is a right bloody swindle for the country.they get enough wage as it is and they are supposed to be doing whats best for the country more like thier own bank accounts.fatter pigs all in the trough telling the rest of the animals how to behave. orwell had this lot right on the nose.

[shepp 2,285]

I was thinking the same as you shotup, the party which came about to help the working class has managed to come up with another tax to kick him straight in the bollocks.

Talk about out of touch.

[DDD 4]

I remember the so- called tests that they perform when they brought the dangerous dog law into Germany.

 

One part was to have your dog tied to a post in a public place & with it sitting down, a complete stranger (the tester) would walk up to it, thrust their hand forward straight over the top of the dogs head & then gauge it's reaction - if aggression(for that read fear) showed it was dangerous! Theres many ways for a dog to interpret your intentions by the way you walk up to it, let alone force your hand over it's head as if it's going to get hit.

 

Other tests where to see reaction to other dogs, again, in the park with dog walking past with owner.

 

Absolute joke.

 

Naturally when they broadcast these tests on the news every c*nt thought they could walk up and thrust their hand over the top of a dogs head & report their findings.

 

 

IMO dangerous dogs aren't the problem it's feckin :wankerzo4: owners.

 

Back to licencing - another money making scheme for fat man Broon.

[Little Butch 16]

Sounds like another money making scheme from our so called 'government'

There will come a time when you have to buy a licence to f*****g take a shit next

But what exactly can we do to stop all of this licencing ?

I really dont know

Butch

[timjim 43]

the more things we get taxed on or the more things we have to buy licences for makes me want to leave this country all the more,

 

as a bricklayer i was earning more money in the early 90`s than i am now, but everything costs 3 or 4 times the amount as well, where i was well off then i now struggle to make ends meet

 

this country is fecked