SEAN3513 7 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 story in our local paper..............................couple of blokes out shooting foxes ( one of them being the land owner).....anyway, it was dark and this anti grabbed their gun and ammo ( fac). so they couldn't shoot anymore. the two men in question had the good sense to call the police!!! the police are charging the anti...........................with,and this is the good bit!!!!!! possesion of a firearm without a certificate.................sweet!!!!! looking at a 5 stretch minimum i beleive!!!! justice and common sense from the local constabulary!!!!! will try and get a link up later!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Little Butch 16 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Wow the police actually did a good job for once. Butch Quote Link to post Share on other sites
heatmeiser 0 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Serves the idiot right. Charge him with possesion of stolen goods too? :clapper: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,116 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 One guy grabbed a weapon off two blokes?Who was he?Rambo? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mark01856 7 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 brilliant Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sue 1 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 could there be trespass too just to keep them locked up a little longer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,116 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 They couldnt keep John Rambo in remember,he took to the woods,if this guy can wrestle a gun from two armed men we could be looking at "Rambo-The ressurection" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,116 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 They couldnt keep John Rambo in remember,he took to the woods,if this guy can wrestle a gun from two armed men we could be looking at "Rambo-The ressurection" LMFAO they must have bein very calm men to let him get it off em most would just shoot into the air and the anti would run for dear life or they could have bein small men and one bit mongo of a rambo! Maybe he just asked for it nicely and said please? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ditch_Shitter Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Perhaps they just thought; This is handy! Let the f*cking idiot take the gun. Then call the Gards ..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Irish Lurcher 1,013 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 He will get a slap on the hand and told not to do it again, his Daddy will be holding court Quote Link to post Share on other sites
polecat 1 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 They couldnt keep John Rambo in remember,he took to the woods,if this guy can wrestle a gun from two armed men we could be looking at "Rambo-The ressurection" LMFAO they must have bein very calm men to let him get it off em most would just shoot into the air and the anti would run for dear life or they could have bein small men and one bit mongo of a rambo! why did they let him take gun in first place ????????????????????????????? when it was landowners land ?????????????????? should get done with a few charges then assult on two men theft also having loaded gun on private land for posss poaching ?????????????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Irish Lurcher 1,013 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 If your caught on land over here with a loaded gun without permission you can with done with armed trespass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BlueCoyote 0 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Perhaps they just thought; This is handy! Let the f*cking idiot take the gun. Then call the Gards ..... that was my thought. unless the anti also had a gun of his own that wasnt mentioned in the article. i'd like to see the follow up of this too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SEAN3513 7 Posted May 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 (edited) sorry folks this sorry is not on the net......so i will add a little more info here: this case is in court at the moment! the man being prosecuted has said in court that " he feared for his life" when they where lamping 100yds away from his house!?!?!? strange that he also runs an environmetaly freindly business!! they where in their discovery and he marched up to it and took their gun whilst hurling a barrage of fowl language at them, he also came back and took their mobile phone!!! there was three of them in the discovery only young lads 21,16 and undisclosed. the 21 year old has an fac and written permission(farmers son)....is a former game keeper and has been known by the gun taker for several years!!!!!!! the trial continues.........i will be watching with interest and posting the outcome on here!!!! lets hope common sense prevails!!!!!!! Edited May 16, 2008 by SEAN3513 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dicka 1 Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 he has also been charged with having a first world war pistol & ammo Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.