Jump to content

names of lines


Guest whitser

Recommended Posts

We have line bred the same line for 30 years with not many failures. I see people for years breeding shite to shite and that is why they have shite. everytime a litter ov pups is on this thread people want to buy them if u have good dogs why would u want to buy pups from strangers.Because ye are the people who did not watch yere breeding lines and put anything on anything .That is why ye have fuckall now. breed your lines very astutely and u will always have them

Link to post

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

we know that, but with a line already up and running whats the point in adding hound crosses, stafford crosses?????

 

which will produce just more failures!

 

if the old lines are good, you have a higher chance of sucess with entering your dog!

 

if it aint broke dont fix it...

 

Because weak points get bred in aswell as strong points and the careful breeder is aware of this and knows what to do to elimenate the weakness.

Link to post
Guest 10/22
STILL AWAITING YOUR REPLY SOUNDER,WHICH IS IT,THE EXCELLANT DOG OF PED UNKNOWN OR THE AVERAGE DOG WITH HISTORY??

 

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION MATE.

 

 

Personally i wouldnt use any of the above and would sooner leave my bitch empty, I would want, and expect to be able to trace an excellant dog with history if not somethings gone wrong , more especially with all the noise the working lads make about their dogs. Second best or excuses for using inferior sires certainly dont wash with me.

Edited by 10/22
Link to post
SURELY MATE BUT SOUNDER SEEMS TO THINK ITS JUST AS SIMPLE AS WORKER TO WORKER THERES LOTS OF FACTORS IN PLAY IS MY POINT.
pip you breed a what u want and get what u want i breed what i want and get what i want a a worker not a picture

u can have all the factors u in play u want and it still might work as a worker,trained and started right that what it down to in my book :feck:

Link to post
SURELY MATE BUT SOUNDER SEEMS TO THINK ITS JUST AS SIMPLE AS WORKER TO WORKER THERES LOTS OF FACTORS IN PLAY IS MY POINT.
pip you breed a what u want and get what u want i breed what i want and get what i want a a worker not a picture

u can have all the factors u in play u want and it still might work as a worker,trained and started right that what it down to in my book :feck:

WELL THOUGHT OUT THERE :icon_redface: BRIAN PLUMMER REINCARNATE,TRAINED AND STARTED RIGHT???? :whistling:

Link to post
SURELY MATE BUT SOUNDER SEEMS TO THINK ITS JUST AS SIMPLE AS WORKER TO WORKER THERES LOTS OF FACTORS IN PLAY IS MY POINT.
pip you breed a what u want and get what u want i breed what i want and get what i want a a worker not a picture

u can have all the factors u in play u want and it still might work as a worker,trained and started right that what it down to in my book :feck:

WELL THOUGHT OUT THERE :icon_redface: BRIAN PLUMMER REINCARNATE,TRAINED AND STARTED RIGHT???? :whistling:

thanks pip :tongue2:
Link to post
Guest whitser

pip and some lads are missing my point. im not saying breeding from a line is bad, i know lads that have bred off the same line for years. but what im saying is there is too much emphasis on the name of this line and that. terriers should only be judged on what it does in the ground. i'd breed off a dog of unkown origon once it does its job well underground. ultimately you should judge a dog at his work not who bred him or what line he's off.

Link to post
Guest whitser
We have line bred the same line for 30 years with not many failures. I see people for years breeding shite to shite and that is why they have shite. everytime a litter ov pups is on this thread people want to buy them if u have good dogs why would u want to buy pups from strangers.Because ye are the people who did not watch yere breeding lines and put anything on anything .That is why ye have fuckall now. breed your lines very astutely and u will always have them

yes breed off a line but each dog off the line should be judged at his work. there for even if your breeding off a line your still breeding worker to worker. i would rather a pup from two dogs i've dug too but didnt know their history, rather then a pup off any line be it nuttall gould or any other terrierman. and im not knocking anyones line of dogs here. just saying that it seems to me that sometimes the name has become more important then the dog.

Edited by whitser
Link to post
pip and some lads are missing my point. im not saying breeding from a line is bad, i know lads that have bred off the same line for years. but what im saying is there is too much emphasis on the name of this line and that. terriers should only be judged on what it does in the ground. i'd breed off a dog of unkown origon once it does its job well underground. ultimately you should judge a dog at his work not who bred him or what line he's off.

well said mate i am with u with this

(i'd breed off a dog of unkown origon once it does its job well) that worker to worker to me,i don't give a f**k if they

have bred off the same line for years who realy cares as long as it works well.cheers sounder :tongue2:

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...