scotty12 2,754 Posted yesterday at 14:33 Report Share Posted yesterday at 14:33 28 minutes ago, mC HULL said: i wonder sometimes if your the product of first cousins lol He's defo a closely line bred lol brother /sister mating 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mC HULL 13,855 Posted yesterday at 14:37 Report Share Posted yesterday at 14:37 6 minutes ago, Goly said: If you're from Hull you're definitely bred tighter lol. Medically and morally speaking, both are damaging to unborn babies, so, what's the difference? If we wanted to be objective then both should be banned. but were talking coursing marriages so let’s ban that first Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 14:45 Report Share Posted yesterday at 14:45 10 minutes ago, scotty12 said: He's defo a closely line bred lol brother /sister mating You're from the Scottish borders? I'm saying double bred on your granddad? In desperate need of an outcross. Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 14:46 Report Share Posted yesterday at 14:46 8 minutes ago, mC HULL said: but were talking coursing marriages so let’s ban that first Coursing marriages? Lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scotty12 2,754 Posted yesterday at 15:06 Report Share Posted yesterday at 15:06 20 minutes ago, Goly said: You're from the Scottish borders? I'm saying double bred on your granddad? In desperate need of an outcross. Lol Wrong again CHIMP lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 15:09 Report Share Posted yesterday at 15:09 1 minute ago, scotty12 said: Wrong again CHIMP lol Father/daughter, even closer than I thought. Tighter than a coursing bred on a leveret. Lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,350 Posted yesterday at 16:18 Report Share Posted yesterday at 16:18 On 27/02/2025 at 17:25, saluki bouy said: how does he like the horses pal? I find them extremely therapeutic I hope he does as well He’s good round all animals mate , don’t get me wrong we are very lucky as he is relatively functioning, it’s not like he’s rainman . he really liked the horses to be honest 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jukel123 8,809 Posted yesterday at 16:54 Report Share Posted yesterday at 16:54 3 hours ago, Goly said: Hypothetical question, should smoking be banned, if not, in what way is it different to cousin marriages from a health perspective? Lol I think the honourable member for Hull has explained the difference. I'm not being disrespectful but if you can't see the difference, it's your problem mate. Lots of countries have banned cousin marriage. Lots of countries have banned the burqa. They are both medieval practices which do not belong in the modern world. They are both practices which demean women. It's not even anti Islamic. It's just common sense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 16:58 Report Share Posted yesterday at 16:58 (edited) 7 minutes ago, jukel123 said: I think the honourable member for Hull has explained the difference. I'm not being disrespectful but if you can't see the difference, it's your problem mate. Lots of countries have banned cousin marriage. Lots of countries have banned the burqa. They are both medieval practices which do not belong in the modern world. They are both practices which demean women. It's not even anti Islamic. It's just common sense. You can't see the difference or else you would have mentioned it. Health wise what is the difference? In fact if we want to be honest, smoking is more damaging as it not only damages the unborn, it also damages the smoker and others around them. It's funny how the human mind works, again, if we wanted to be objective, both would be banned. If the decision was made by AI, that is what it would do. Edited yesterday at 17:02 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jukel123 8,809 Posted yesterday at 17:07 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:07 6 minutes ago, Goly said: You can't see the difference or else you would have mentioned it. Health wise what is the difference? In fact if we want to be honest, smoking is more damaging as it not only damages the unborn, it also damages the smoker and others around them. It's funny how the human mind works, again, if we wanted to be objective, both would be banned. If the decision was made by AI, that is what it would do. OK, let's try another argument. Politics is the art of the possible. Pragmatically, it is possible to change the law to make it illegal to marry a cousin. It is comparatively easy to police and to prosecute. Not so smoking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 17:12 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:12 (edited) 12 minutes ago, jukel123 said: OK, let's try another argument. Politics is the art of the possible. Pragmatically, it is possible to change the law to make it illegal to marry a cousin. It is comparatively easy to police and to prosecute. Not so smoking. Which is what I mentioned earlier, how does that prevent premarital sex and the same problems with birth defects? I believe it should be outlawed but I'm not really sure we are concerned about the health implications if we are being honest, we just find it repulsive. Edited yesterday at 17:21 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jukel123 8,809 Posted yesterday at 17:33 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:33 19 minutes ago, Goly said: Which is what I mentioned earlier, how does that prevent premarital sex and the same problems with birth defects? I believe it should be outlawed but I'm not really sure we are concerned about the health implications if we are being honest, we just find it repulsive. Of course it would not prevent sex taking place. But it would be a prosecutable offence as incest is now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,773 Posted yesterday at 17:35 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:35 Just now, jukel123 said: Of course it would not prevent sex taking place. But it would be a prosecutable offence as incest is now. Yes, but seeing as it's the sex and not the marriage that leads to birth defects it will be next to impossible to police, unless you believe that these people don't have sex before marriage. Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jukel123 8,809 Posted yesterday at 17:49 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:49 11 minutes ago, Goly said: Yes, but seeing as it's the sex and not the marriage that leads to birth defects it will be next to impossible to police, unless you believe that these people don't have sex before marriage. Lol There would be a clash of the Islamic/Christian and legal worlds. But eventually the !egal and Christian world would win. Might take decades but its a change worth pursuing imo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,805 Posted yesterday at 17:53 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:53 16 minutes ago, Goly said: unless you believe that these people don't have sex before marriage. Pakistan they wouldn't,they would NEVER be alone together,great dishonour to the family. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.