scotty12 2,196 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 51 minutes ago, Goly said: I believe he was making "false" claims against a Syrian refugee. The particular kid had been attacked at school, Robinson then shared a video citing the Syrian was a violent thug, a claim that was apparently untrue. The video Robinson shared got millions of views and the lad and his family started receiving death threats. Three years later the lad won 100k in damages for defamation and the court imposed an injunction on Robinson. He then started repeating his claims and made a video claiming he's been silenced by the state. He breached his injunction numerous times and was thus jailed. Mainstream narrative I don't even like the c**t Tommy Robinson he's a Helmet but he's in jail for freedom of speech go do some proper digging of what that Syrian was actually like he was a little b*****d Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 (edited) 10 minutes ago, scotty12 said: Mainstream narrative I don't even like the c**t Tommy Robinson he's a Helmet but he's in jail for freedom of speech go do some proper digging of what that Syrian was actually like he was a little b*****d I can't be arsed, but, the lad was getting bullied in that particular incident, the video is clear to be seen. It was deemed in court that he was not a thug, wether you want to argue they were lying that's another matter. But, the lad was getting death threats from some of Robinson's supporters, Tommy was given an injunction and broke it numerous times, it really is that simple. He even admitted contempt of court, case closed. Wether he is right in his quest against the media and the state, he is guilty of his crime, he is not above the law. Edited January 6 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 I admire Tommy for having the balls to talk about certain issues but that doesn't mean he isn't also a lying grifter. Here's a man that begged his supporters for a six figure sum to support his case in court and then immediately pleaded guilty. Under oath he admitted that the accusations against the Syrian lad were false. Robinson originally either lied, or gave false information that the Syrian had assaulted two girls. After one of the girls parents posted on one of his posts that the Syrian wasn't the attacker, Robinson backtracked on his claims saying he'd been misled. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FLATTOP 4,502 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 22 minutes ago, Goly said: I can't be arsed, but, the lad was getting bullied in that particular incident, the video is clear to be seen. It was deemed in court that he was not a thug, wether you want to argue they were lying that's another matter. But, the lad was getting death threats from some of Robinson's supporters, Tommy was given an injunction and broke it numerous times, it really is that simple. He even admitted contempt of court, case closed. Wether he is right in his quest against the media and the state, he is guilty of his crime, he is not above the law. Please watch all of the film not 5 minutes the Syrian was a wrong un. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 3 minutes ago, FLATTOP said: Please watch all of the film not 5 minutes the Syrian was a wrong un. He promised to bring proof of that in court but never did, why is that? He was funded tens of thousands of pounds and immediately pleaded guilty? If he had a good case why did he fold quicker than a deck chair? He admitted under oath that the accusations against this kid was false? Perhaps the kid wasn't whiter than white, nobody is, but if he is not guilty of the accused then that's all that matters in this particular incident. All we do know for a fact is that the lad was filmed being bullied, a clip blown out of proportion from both sides. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FLATTOP 4,502 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 4 minutes ago, Goly said: He promised to bring proof of that in court but never did, why is that? He was funded tens of thousands of pounds and immediately pleaded guilty? If he had a good case why did he fold quicker than a deck chair? He admitted under oath that the accusations against this kid was false? Perhaps the kid wasn't whiter than white, nobody is, but if he is not guilty of the accused then that's all that matters in this particular incident. All we do know for a fact is that the lad was filmed being bullied, a clip blown out of proportion from both sides. We can’t all be wrong can we ? I will stick to what I think, he’s a wrong un and it was portrayed the way it was not to upset Muslims my opinion obviously you’ve got yours, but seriously I can see the time approaching where you have got to pick a side I know what side i am on. Any way have a good day I’m now going to chop some wood. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 12 minutes ago, FLATTOP said: We can’t all be wrong can we ? I will stick to what I think, he’s a wrong un and it was portrayed the way it was not to upset Muslims my opinion obviously you’ve got yours, but seriously I can see the time approaching where you have got to pick a side I know what side i am on. Any way have a good day I’m now going to chop some wood. We can't all be wrong? Actions speak louder than words. He pleaded guilty immediately after promising to prove in court that the kid was a bad egg, he had the funding for a great defence after he asked his followers for money, but he didn't even put forward a case, that doesn't sound very convincing to me. I don't understand your point, picking a side? I have no dog in this fight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scotty12 2,196 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 3 hours ago, Goly said: I can't be arsed, but, the lad was getting bullied in that particular incident, the video is clear to be seen. It was deemed in court that he was not a thug, wether you want to argue they were lying that's another matter. But, the lad was getting death threats from some of Robinson's supporters, Tommy was given an injunction and broke it numerous times, it really is that simple. He even admitted contempt of court, case closed. Wether he is right in his quest against the media and the state, he is guilty of his crime, he is not above the law. Go on that podcast that I've screenshotted can't get the link up on here and fast forward to 26 minutes then maybe actually listen to what happened and educate yourself instead of listening the mainstream news 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 23 minutes ago, scotty12 said: Go on that podcast that I've screenshotted can't get the link up on here and fast forward to 26 minutes then maybe actually listen to what happened and educate yourself instead of listening the mainstream news I'll give it a watch but mainstream news didn't prevent him from making a case, why did he plead guilty if he had them bang to rights? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel cain 45,813 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 Will be an interesting day...IF the time comes and we all have to pick a side.... I will be choosing my own 'Kind/People'...I've no alliances to f***ing Abdul who cuts my hair or sells me bags... everyone of them should be sent back to the rocks they crawled from, Syrian, African, Eastern European.... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Daniel cain said: Will be an interesting day...IF the time comes and we all have to pick a side.... I will be choosing my own 'Kind/People'...I've no alliances to f***ing Abdul who cuts my hair or sells me bags... everyone of them should be sent back to the rocks they crawled from, Syrian, African, Eastern European.... You'd be on to a loser because us English would wipe you out within days. Remember, Wales and Welsh is an Anglo-Saxon term for foreigner/outsider. Edited January 6 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TRUEBRIT66 1,593 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 6 hours ago, Goly said: I believe he was making "false" claims against a Syrian refugee. The particular kid had been attacked at school, Robinson then shared a video citing the Syrian was a violent thug, a claim that was apparently untrue. The video Robinson shared got millions of views and the lad and his family started receiving death threats. Three years later the lad won 100k in damages for defamation and the court imposed an injunction on Robinson. He then started repeating his claims and made a video claiming he's been silenced by the state. He breached his injunction numerous times and was thus jailed. You obviously haven't watched the documentary then where he has evidence that the poor refugee had attacked other children, threatened to kill the white lads Mum and rape his sister that "attacked" him . Also teachers that had signed non disclosures so they couldn't report that the poor Syrian refugee was under special measures for abusing female teachers and assaulting another young girl. The young girl amongst other children gave what they were led to believe was anonymous statements but the judge released their details and they were then demonised by the Muslim community. I could go on but suggest you watch the documentary and then get back to me. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 811 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 1 minute ago, TRUEBRIT66 said: You obviously haven't watched the documentary then where he has evidence that the poor refugee had attacked other children, threatened to kill the white lads Mum and rape his sister that "attacked" him . Also teachers that had signed non disclosures so they couldn't report that the poor Syrian refugee was under special measures for abusing female teachers and assaulting another young girl. The young girl amongst other children gave what they were led to believe was anonymous statements but the judge released their details and they were then demonised by the Muslim community. I could go on but suggest you watch the documentary and then get back to me. Yeah, I've just watched it tbh. And yes, I have somewhat changed my mind. But me point still stands, he pledged to not stay silent this time out of fear for a longer sentence. So why on earth did he roll over and plead guilty without presenting a solid case, a case that would have been generously funded, I can't understand him. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scotty12 2,196 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 1 hour ago, Goly said: I'll give it a watch but mainstream news didn't prevent him from making a case, why did he plead guilty if he had them bang to rights? 2 minutes ago, Goly said: Yeah, I've just watched it tbh. And yes, I have somewhat changed my mind. But me point still stands, he pledged to not stay silent this time out of fear for a longer sentence. So why on earth did he roll over and plead guilty without presenting a solid case, a case that would have been generously funded, I can't understand him. Because if the establishment want you they get you why do all big criminals plead guilty to get a reduced sentence Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel cain 45,813 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 50 minutes ago, Goly said: You'd be on to a loser because us English would wipe you out within days. Remember, Wales and Welsh is an Anglo-Saxon term for foreigner/outsider. You English are a mixture of all the dregs... heinz 57 blend of french/Scandinavian etc...sold your own people out countless times the last 800 yrs... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.