9-11 anniversary

[TOMO 26,003]

8 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

we don’t know the explosives they have today mate 

the yanks are masters at keeping people quiet mate and propaganda there on another level 

people still think oswald killed kennedy how many would have kept that quiet ? 

 

or the biggest lie ever told the moon landing 

 

Mate it's not moon landing ...its moon LANDINGS...there have been several 5 or 6 I think...not to mention all the unmanned landings...Hell even India put one on there this year...

What's to be gained by lieing about landing on the moon

[mC HULL 12,118]

4 minutes ago, TOMO said:

Mate it's not moon landing ...its moon LANDINGS...there have been several 5 or 6 I think...not to mention all the unmanned landings...Hell even India put one on there this year...

What's to be gained by lieing about landing on the moon

loads was gained lol at the time the usa and russia were struggling and most countrys are today to get a missile (rocket) to go 10000 miles lol 

you mess around china korea etc we can hit the moon never mind you 

but the usa and russia could send one a quarter of a million miles lol 

 

right then so india just been china how hard is it to put a man in the rocket ? 

i thought nasa had lost all information they needed to get there ? 

 

not to mention the rocks brought back from the moon lol turned out to be petrified wood ffs lol 

 

and it’s supposed to have been double figures the   landing 

Edited September 14 by mC HULL

[tatsblisters 9,410]

18 minutes ago, TOMO said:

Thing is the only issue I have with this theory is....to demolish two buildings in that manner ie...controlled explosions...would take some planning and would have a lot of people involved in putting the explosives in place...that would mean keeping a lot of people quiet 

That's true mate especially buildings of that magnitude even though when i worked on demolition for a while i never worked on big jobs being prepped for controlled demolition with the use of explosives but know it could take months for a some what dangerous job of prepping said job as the horrendous accident that happened at Didcot power station some years back were lads were buried alive one who i knew and a manager on the job who i have worked with in the past. I think it's down to how the twin towers came down after being hit by aircraft that raises questions.

[big feet 324]

4 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

loads was gained lol at the time the usa and russia were struggling and most countrys are today to get a missile (rocket) to go 10000 miles lol 

you mess around china korea etc we can hit the moon never mind you 

but the usa and russia could send one a quarter of a million miles lol 

 

right then so india just been china how hard is it to put a man in the rocket ? 

i thought nasa had lost all information they needed to get there ? 

 

not to mention the rocks brought back from the moon lol turned out to be petrified wood ffs lol 

 

and it’s supposed to have been double figures the   landing 

So, if the Yanks faked it then why didn't the Soviets expose it given they were in a Cold War with each other and there was a big competition between the two to be the first to land on the moon?

[mC HULL 12,118]

1 minute ago, tatsblisters said:

That's true mate especially buildings of that magnitude even though when i worked on demolition for a while i never worked on big jobs being prepped for controlled demolition with the use of explosives but know it could take months for a some what dangerous job of prepping said job as the horrendous accident that happened at Didcot power station some years back were lads were buried alive one who i knew and a manager on the job who i have worked with in the past. I think it's down to how the twin towers came down after being hit by aircraft that raises questions.

it had been bombed ten year before mate loads a work went on for ages 

[mC HULL 12,118]

Just now, big feet said:

So, if the Yanks faked it then why didn't the Soviets expose it given they were in a Cold War with each other and there was a big competition between the two to be the first to land on the moon?

you just answered your own question 

the russians were suppose to of been the first to land so if they pulled the yanks they look the same 

 

[tatsblisters 9,410]

2 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

it had been bombed ten year before mate loads a work went on for ages 

That could have been a cover for prepping the building though the amount of people that would have involved also raises the question why no whistlblower has come forward.

[big feet 324]

14 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

you just answered your own question 

the russians were suppose to of been the first to land so if they pulled the yanks they look the same 

 

No, I asked why they didn't expose them. Are you saying that the Soviets were fooled, come on mate don't be silly? Lol

[mC HULL 12,118]

4 minutes ago, big feet said:

No, I asked why they didn't expose them. Are you saying that the Soviets were fooled, come on mate don't be silly? Lol

if they expose them then they would be exposed lol

[tatsblisters 9,410]

1 minute ago, big feet said:

No, I asked why they didn't expose them. Are you saying that the Soviets were fooled, come on mate don't be silly? Lol

I honestly don't think it was an inside job. Who in their right mind would prepp a building like that that would kill innocents in them numbers without it playing on their minds to the loss of lives they were going to be part of.

[TOMO 26,003]

13 minutes ago, tatsblisters said:

I honestly don't think it was an inside job. Who in their right mind would prepp a building like that that would kill innocents in them numbers without it playing on their minds to the loss of lives they were going to be part of.

Exactly that...let's not forget there was a creche or nursery type place in one of them buildings...no ones going to want to be responsible for that

[mC HULL 12,118]

20 minutes ago, tatsblisters said:

I honestly don't think it was an inside job. Who in their right mind would prepp a building like that that would kill innocents in them numbers without it playing on their minds to the loss of lives they were going to be part of.

 

4 minutes ago, TOMO said:

Exactly that...let's not forget there was a creche or nursery type place in one of them buildings...no ones going to want to be responsible for that

come on you been serious lol 

collateral damage what’s a few thousand these people don’t think like us if they did they would be the sheep 

[waltjnr 6,558]

28 minutes ago, tatsblisters said:

I honestly don't think it was an inside job. Who in their right mind would prepp a building like that that would kill innocents in them numbers without it playing on their minds to the loss of lives they were going to be part of.

"Innocents" lol pawns in a big game of chess ,sacrificing a few thousand to achieve thier end goal is nothing ,those at top of ladder don't care one bit for the likes of us ,indispensable cannon fodder 

[WILF 46,549]

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

 

comical listening to lads lol 

did you see it fall ? 

I did, I watched the whole thing.

Spread load and point load…..simple as that imho 

[TOMO 26,003]

20 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

 

come on you been serious lol 

collateral damage what’s a few thousand these people don’t think like us if they did they would be the sheep 

Yeh of course collateral damage ....that's all OK when your bombing Syria or Afghanistan....but come on...must of took years of planning and several hundred man hours..and men...most of which would have been contractors...or a f**k load of cia agents prepared to kill 3000 of there own country men...I'm just not buying it