Tucker carlson interviews putin

[WILF 48,398]

12 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

After the fall of the Soviet Union, Putin turned Russia into a Kleptocracy; sharing out all the industry and wealth with his friends and supporters. 
Him and his pals became billionaires and the Russian people became poorer.

Yes, our lot are lying, corrupt shithouses, but are amateurs compared to Putin.

Cheers.

Come on mate, they ain’t poorer than bread cues and Trabants, they just ain’t ! 
I just defies logic to suggest they are. 
 

 

[THE STIFFMEISTER 16,492]

2 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

lol you’ve been to the indoctrination camp and passed with flying colours ffs lol 

Prove me wrong 

[NEWKID 27,822]

Western leaders are shithouses and don't give a f**k for the common man, that has been proven time and again...but to suggest the multi billionaire Putin cares for his people anymore is ridiculous, he's amassed a fortune that no western leader can get near, he's done it by raping the mass resource that Russia boasts and his people can't call foul play or they aren't seen again...is the average Russian truly better off than your average English man or American?

[mC HULL 14,487]

8 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Prove me wrong 

answer thess with just a yes or no 

 

has the west and nato been expanding towards russia the last 30 years 

 

has russia been expanding west the last 30 year 

[mC HULL 14,487]

stiff it would a took your commanding officer 30 seconds to convince you to gas men women and children if you was german in the 40s 

 

just stop look at all sides of the argument and think for yourself mate lol it ain’t healthy a 40 year old man to just blindly follow 

[THE STIFFMEISTER 16,492]

Yes 

no 

simple 

but show me where it’s okay for putin to just start hammering countries that want to choose their own destiny . 
 

 

[chartpolski 25,825]

17 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

so the russians aare poorer and worse off since putin came to power chart ?

When the likes of Thatcher and Brown privatised most of the utilities and industries, they sold them to the highest bidders and the proceeds went into the Exchequer.

When Putin sold off Russias infrastructure, he sold them to his cronies for next to nothing and the profits went into THEIR pockets making them billionaires. The Russian people saw nothing of the money .

Putin isn’t the benevolent Solomon you seem to think he is. Power corrupts, as with our politicians; absolute power absolutely corrupt as in Putin and his pals.

I could spend time checking the GDP per capita of Russia from when Putin came to power until now, but I can’t see the point.

Putin has enriched himself and his pals at the expense of the Russian people, just like our lot have enriched themselves at the expense of the British people, so this “Putin good; West bad” doesn’t make sense; at least to me !

Cheers.

[mC HULL 14,487]

3 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Yes 

no 

simple 

but show me where it’s okay for putin to just start hammering countries that want to choose their own destiny . 
 

 

we’re is it ok for the west to hammer countries iraq afghanistan libya syria the list is endless 

 

would it a been ok for kennedy to bomb cuba for wanting russian missiles ? 

if  the biggest most advanced army ever were nearly at your doorstep i think putin has the right to defend his people don’t you ?

[THE STIFFMEISTER 16,492]

Just now, mC HULL said:

stiff it would a took your commanding officer 30 seconds to convince you to gas men women and children if you was german in the 40s 

 

just stop look at all sides of the argument and think for yourself mate lol it ain’t healthy a 40 year old man to just blindly follow 

Mate , I could embarrass you by saying I’m arguably more exposed to this conflict than anyone on here 

I’ve been cordial and civil and will continue to be so as it’s a much more compelling way than just launching insults comrade 

[dogmandont 10,059]

19 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

As for the last one , it’s two seperate issues . 
 

im firmly of the thoughts that Russia were all “ well let’s just f**k up the food market by seizing the Ukrainian farming market and make the west pay through the nose “ as a demonstration of capabilities .

they overreached and have came to a impasse where if they continue they may get leathered and if they retreat they loose face . 
 

the west benefits as it shows how a possible conflict would look with the Russians and the gaps in their capabilities become easy targets to hammer . So elongating the process serves a good study and use of soft power such as funding gives the west the moral high ground without risking reputation or boots lives . 

that simple really . 
 

 

 

Was Putin trying to get his hands on the Ukrainian food market pre 2014?

So the west benefits by funding a war in Ukraine where 100s of thousands of people have been killed so they can see where the Russian weaknesses are in case of a future conflict and Putin is the bad guy in all this. 

[mC HULL 14,487]

4 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

When the likes of Thatcher and Brown privatised most of the utilities and industries, they sold them to the highest bidders and the proceeds went into the Exchequer.

When Putin sold off Russias infrastructure, he sold them to his cronies for next to nothing and the profits went into THEIR pockets making them billionaires. The Russian people saw nothing of the money .

Putin isn’t the benevolent Solomon you seem to think he is. Power corrupts, as with our politicians; absolute power absolutely corrupt as in Putin and his pals.

I could spend time checking the GDP per capita of Russia from when Putin came to power until now, but I can’t see the point.

Putin has enriched himself and his pals at the expense of the Russian people, just like our lot have enriched themselves at the expense of the British people, so this “Putin good; West bad” doesn’t make sense; at least to me !

Cheers.

in this scenario chart we’re the west are taking land right up to the russian border id say we’re in the wrong wouldn’t you ?

[Wolfdog91 7,471]

That interview was pure propaganda Jesus Christ. Why not to mean we're doing with a ex KGB agent who whole deal revolves around how to manipulate people....lol

[mC HULL 14,487]

1 minute ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Mate , I could embarrass you by saying I’m arguably more exposed to this conflict than anyone on here 

I’ve been cordial and civil and will continue to be so as it’s a much more compelling way than just launching insults comrade 

i’m not insulting you stiff or not meaning to anyway 

 

your only embarrassing yourself by been a minion for the scummy c**ts we have in charge mate 

[mC HULL 14,487]

2 minutes ago, Wolfdog91 said:

That interview was pure propaganda Jesus Christ. Why not to mean we're doing with a ex KGB agent who whole deal revolves around how to manipulate people....lol

lol the cia run your shitty country you yanks know all about manipulation on a grand scale lol 

[chartpolski 25,825]

Just now, mC HULL said:

in this scenario chart we’re the west are taking land right up to the russian border id say we’re in the wrong wouldn’t you ?

I see it slightly different to you; I see countries that had formally been part of the USSR now being independent and wanting to join a freer , richer , more democratic west. 
They are joining us, we aren't invading them.

Cheers.