Jump to content

Star net ???


Recommended Posts


His ambition is 40.000 satellite's. I know Russia tried to hack some American system and his staff neutralised the treat and hacked there computer's within half an hour, something that would have taken weeks if the Pentagon had done it themselves, Makes you wont why someone would want/need 40,000 satellite's just for broadband Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, paulus said:

His ambition is 40.000 satellite's. I know Russia tried to hack some American system and his staff neutralised the treat and hacked there computer's within half an hour, something that would have taken weeks if the Pentagon had done it themselves, Makes you wont why someone would want/need 40,000 satellite's just for broadband Lol

when half the world is on X Hamster jacking off....the last thing you want is "Buffering" coming up to the vinegar stroke...

simples

  • Haha 10
Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, paulus said:

His ambition is 40.000 satellite's. I know Russia tried to hack some American system and his staff neutralised the treat and hacked there computer's within half an hour, something that would have taken weeks if the Pentagon had done it themselves, Makes you wont why someone would want/need 40,000 satellite's just for broadband Lol

What they’re trying to offer is global internet. They could do that with many less satellites if they were far away and so could see a large portion of the earth but then user experience would be shite because the signals would take so long to travel the distance it’d create lag for users. So you put the satellites in a lower orbit which means they see less of the earth so you need more for continuous global coverage. You then need to multiply by two or three to add system redundancy.

Its interesting to me because the sheer number makes the system immune to anti satellite weapons. Until there’s an advancement in them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Born Hunter said:

What they’re trying to offer is global internet. They could do that with many less satellites if they were far away and so could see a large portion of the earth but then user experience would be shite because the signals would take so long to travel the distance it’d create lag for users. So you put the satellites in a lower orbit which means they see less of the earth so you need more for continuous global coverage. You then need to multiply by two or three to add system redundancy.

Its interesting to me because the sheer number makes the system immune to anti satellite weapons. Until there’s an advancement in them.

You mean they need line of sight to communicate with each other, Yes i have watched "Independence day" Lol. Surely that amount of satellite's in low orbit is an issue for anything else to be launched?

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, paulus said:

You mean they need line of sight to communicate with each other, Yes i have watched "Independence day" Lol. Surely that amount of satellite's in low orbit is an issue for anything else to be launched?

I assume anyone with a launch capability has a pretty good awareness of what’s where. But yeah space junk is a growing concern in that sector.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Born Hunter said:

What they’re trying to offer is global internet. They could do that with many less satellites if they were far away and so could see a large portion of the earth but then user experience would be shite because the signals would take so long to travel the distance it’d create lag for users. So you put the satellites in a lower orbit which means they see less of the earth so you need more for continuous global coverage. You then need to multiply by two or three to add system redundancy.

Its interesting to me because the sheer number makes the system immune to anti satellite weapons. Until there’s an advancement in them.

You need to get out more born , it’s not good for you pal 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...