Multiculturalism,a failure,finally there’s realisation.

[mC HULL 14,205]

43 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Braverman is playing a clever game. She is criticising a situation which has been overseen and  created  by her own party. Why have the tories lost control over immigration? Answer, because they don't give a damn. Its a very lòw priority for them. They have promised immigration in the "tens of thousands " by three different tory leaders since 2010. However recently, they have dropped that promise and now talk about " reducing"  immigration". So it's rich for a tory to be pointing  out the failures of her own party as though out _of _control immigration is something only she has noticed.

As for multiculturalism what has her  contribution to British society? She went from school to uni, to a brief job in law, to government and now believes she's entitled to tell us all what to think. She has never made anything, never grafted.  She has ,allegedly, earned her way around the expenses  gravy train pretty quick too. At the same time she put the country's security at risk be sending unprotected government emails from her home address. She's a gift for  the russians and others.

She's a member of some Buddhist sect which is riddled with sexual abuse. We've got enough religions with our own sexual abusers without importing Eastern versions. That's another multicultural gift to the nation we could do without.

Perhaps she could suggest putting money into upskilling our own workforce so the need for immigration is much reduced. The UK has relied on cheap labour for decades. Its cheaper and easily disposed of. And there's an endless supply which drives down worker's rights and pay thresholds. It would also be a good idea to employ more immigration employees to deal with the  immigration backlog. The tories slashed the number of immigration staff when Osborne and Cameron blitzed the whole country with unprecedented spending  cuts during the austerity years.

She is some chancer.

 

 

 

 

 

she knows what the british want and that’s no immigration we want a white british britain 

the c**ts with money who control the media will say different and brainwash the foolish 

but this will get her votes without a doubt 

[chartpolski 25,475]

1 minute ago, mC HULL said:

she knows what the british want and that’s no immigration we want a white british britain 

the c**ts with money who control the media will say different and brainwash the foolish 

but this will get her votes without a doubt 

She won’t be getting my vote !

Shes in a position to do something about it, instead of just talking about it, but doesn’t !

The Rwanda policy was passed by the Houses of Parliament, but overturned by an anonymous European judge.

She could have just said “ we note your concerns but Parliament is sovereign “ Just like we did with the vote for prisoners !

I keep saying it ; all empty rhetoric and no action !

Cheers.

[mC HULL 14,205]

27 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

She won’t be getting my vote !

Shes in a position to do something about it, instead of just talking about it, but doesn’t !

The Rwanda policy was passed by the Houses of Parliament, but overturned by an anonymous European judge.

She could have just said “ we note your concerns but Parliament is sovereign “ Just like we did with the vote for prisoners !

I keep saying it ; all empty rhetoric and no action !

Cheers.

she wants to send them to rwanda id say chart 

[Bakerboy 4,737]

32 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

She won’t be getting my vote !

Shes in a position to do something about it, instead of just talking about it, but doesn’t !

The Rwanda policy was passed by the Houses of Parliament, but overturned by an anonymous European judge.

She could have just said “ we note your concerns but Parliament is sovereign “ Just like we did with the vote for prisoners !

I keep saying it ; all empty rhetoric and no action !

Cheers.

Next time I vote for a major party will be when I see boatloads of immigrants leaving daily

[greg64 2,918]

1 minute ago, mC HULL said:

she wants to send them to rwanda id say chart 

but how many would they actually send if they could a few plane loads at most, and we have had thousands turn up weekly 

[chartpolski 25,475]

3 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

she wants to send them to rwanda id say chart 

Then why didnt she do it ?

Theres was nothing to stop her, even when the ECHR said we couldn’t, there was precedent with the prisoners vote decision where we ignored the ECHR.

It was only when the lefty lawyers started the court cases that it’s been put on hold. If that first plane had taken off it would have proven a massive deterrent.

Believe me, even if the Supreme Court finds in favour of the government, it will be passed back to the ECHR who will veto it. Going round in circles until Labour get in and repeal the Rwanda law meaning it will never happen.

Cheers.

[chartpolski 25,475]

6 minutes ago, greg64 said:

but how many would they actually send if they could a few plane loads at most, and we have had thousands turn up weekly 

It doesn’t matter if it’s only one plane load; would you hand over your life savings to a people smuggler if you though you might end up in an African shithole ?

Cheers.

[Daniel cain 46,755]

4 minutes ago, greg64 said:

but how many would they actually send if they could a few plane loads at most, and we have had thousands turn up weekly 

I still say...a couple of lads on jet skis,dressed in black...when a boats spotted...ride out and run a samurai sword the length of the inflatable...then club the cnuts around the head with some  3x2, remove the life vests and leave them for fish food....word would soon spread...they wouldn't be too keen then....

[Bakerboy 4,737]

1 minute ago, chartpolski said:

Then why didnt she do it ?

Theres was nothing to stop her, even when the ECHR said we couldn’t, there was precedent with the prisoners vote decision where we ignored the ECHR.

It was only when the lefty lawyers started the court cases that it’s been put on hold. If that first plane had taken off it would have proven a massive deterrent.

Believe me, even if the Supreme Court finds in favour of the government, it will be passed back to the ECHR who will veto it. Going round in circles until Labour get in and repeal the Rwanda law meaning it will never happen.

Cheers.

Yep, Spain is sending them back, i know they have an agreement but that shouldnt matter to us we have no-one to answer to

[greg64 2,918]

2 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

It doesn’t matter if it’s only one plane load; would you hand over your life savings to a people smuggler if you though you might end up in an African shithole ?

Cheers.

i don't think it would put them off at all to be honest, as the chances of being put on that plane would virtually nil

[THE STIFFMEISTER 16,381]

1 hour ago, Daniel cain said:

I still say...a couple of lads on jet skis,dressed in black...when a boats spotted...ride out and run a samurai sword the length of the inflatable...then club the cnuts around the head with some  3x2, remove the life vests and leave them for fish food....word would soon spread...they wouldn't be too keen then....

Outrageous 

[mC HULL 14,205]

23 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Outrageous 

they should be arrested jailed  and returned to there country 

[WILF 48,246]

3 hours ago, chartpolski said:

Perhaps if Labours Blair and Mandelson hadn’t thrown the borders open to “rub the rights noses in diversity “; or maybe if Labours Starmer didn’t oppose things like the Rwanda policy and everything else proposed to tackle illegal immigration we wouldn’t be in this position ?

Of course, NONE of the major parties , Tory, Labour, LibDems, SNP, want to do anything about immigration, legal and illegal.

Its only empty rhetoric, designed to fool the voters.

As I said previously; a pox on ALL There houses !

Cheers.

For those of us who like to delve into this stuff, the betrayal gos back way before that.

Dipak Nandy (dad of Lisa Nandy !) was the first director of the Runnymead Trust in 1968 !……never heard of them ?

You should of, they have shaped the disaster we see today !

Dipak Nandy basically wrote the method statement for racial policy for every government since 1968 ! 
 

This is a systematic and sustained, historical betrayal of Britain and everything that ever meant by every government of every party ! 
 

What we see today isn’t new ideas, it’s a plan maturing as they go along.

People need to understand the length and scale of the betrayal to understand the enormity of their predicament…..this isn’t a decade or two decade thing, it’s generational and all consuming. 

[WILF 48,246]

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

they should be arrested jailed  and returned to there country 

If they had camouflage fatigues on we would be shooting them in the water not putting them up in hotels !

Every time one lands everything you ever held dear, everything you ever knew and the country that spawned you dies just a little bit more ! 
 

They are as lethal and dangerous as a bombing raid by any hostile foreign power…..its just what you can see on the news isn’t as dramatic  

[low plains drifter 10,861]

1 hour ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Outrageous 

Weston super mare