Jump to content

XL Bully Ban Incoming


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, DIDO.1 said:

Just read a few comments on a local XL bully Facebook page. The popular opinion is that dogs that kill people have done it because they have never been shown love and affection. 

This is going to be an absolute shite show that the government can't do a single thing about 

These XL owners are deluded. The tabloids are willing to point out the danger of these dogs and then when push  comes to shove, they print sob stories about harmless, loving  Fido being  prised from the loving arms of its caring owners. Its only a "shitshow" if the media whip up sympathy for sweet, affectionate Fido and fire neanderthals up.

Personally if some mastiffs  and  XL  crosses are seized then hard luck. There's always individual losers when it comes to the greater good. I would advocate that its up to owners to prove a dog IS Not an XL and not the police having to prove a particular dog is an XL. If its saves an individual human life a few mistaken dog identities would be worth it.

Edited by jukel123
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 864
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

That's it... I'm out of here!! 

I'm pretty easy going and tolerant about most things ,but every time I see one of those big fat ugly useless earless bags of shite towing a skinny scruffy trackie wearing waste of space and his tattoo

Here's the common sense approach i.m.o... XL bullies added to the existing DDA. Making it illegal to breed and sell so, in theory no other dogs being added to the existing population. A

Posted Images

Lets be honest these types of dogs are great if you live in a wilderness environment and need to protect yourselves and your livestock from dangerous wildlife or in an industrial environment to protect what's yours,  To not give them no purpose in a domestic suburban environment is just an accident waiting to happen, In general society. is there really a need for anyone to own such a dog, docile or not?. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, paulus said:

Lets be honest these types of dogs are great if you live in a wilderness environment and need to protect yourselves and your livestock from dangerous wildlife or in an industrial environment to protect what's yours,  To not give them no purpose in a domestic suburban environment is just an accident waiting to happen, In general society. is there really a need for anyone to own such a dog, docile or not?. 

I think there's better dogs for a job ....these are just cartoon pit dogs, if I was fortunate enough to live in wilderness and wanted man biters I'd probably look for something I could live with day to day around kids

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Borr said:

I think there's better dogs for a job ....these are just cartoon pit dogs, if I was fortunate enough to live in wilderness and wanted man biters I'd probably look for something I could live with day to day around kids

Hence i said "Types of dogs" Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, paulus said:

Lets be honest these types of dogs are great if you live in a wilderness environment and need to protect yourselves and your livestock from dangerous wildlife or in an industrial environment to protect what's yours,  To not give them no purpose in a domestic suburban environment is just an accident waiting to happen, In general society. is there really a need for anyone to own such a dog, docile or not?. 

 We are all surrounded by accidents waiting to happen but we manage them or take the consequences. I think we have to be careful judging the needs of others. Is there really a need for civilians to own guns etc ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jeemes said:

 We are all surrounded by accidents waiting to happen but we manage them or take the consequences. I think we have to be careful judging the needs of others. Is there really a need for civilians to own guns etc ? 

Guns are required to be locked in cabinet's when not being used. Would you leave a loaded gun laying around your home, especially if you have kids?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, paulus said:

Guns are required to be locked in cabinet's when not being used. Would you leave a loaded gun laying around your home, especially if you have kids?

That's right. If an XL escapes from its pen and harms people  it's the same principle as leaving a gun cabinet unlocked for a burglar, an irresponsible family member or a child to get hold of. It's no use saying to the judge it "wasn't me that did the damage me lord". An owner of an XL, or any potentially aggressive dog is in the same position as a careless gun owner. Legally responsible at all times.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, paulus said:

Guns are required to be locked in cabinet's when not being used. Would you leave a loaded gun laying around your home, especially if you have kids?

Of course I wouldnt, lets not get into point scoring.  If I am irresponsible with a gun I can loose it, the right to keep another and get fined or locked up. What Im saying is lets be careful of simplistic judgements that removes the rights of minorites but actually cures nothing. Everyone shouldnt lose their gun because of me.

Edited by jeemes
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jeemes said:

Of course I wouldnt, lets not get into point scoring.  If I am irresponsible with a gun I can loose it, the right to keep another and get fined or locked up. What Im saying is lets be careful of simplistic judgements that removes the rights of minorites but actually cures nothing.

The right of a minority to own a dog that has the potential to be as lethal as a gun for no purpose other than status.  Sorry but i don't get it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

That's right. If an XL escapes from its pen and harms people  it's the same principle as leaving a gun cabinet unlocked for a burglar, an irresponsible family member or a child to get hold of. It's no use saying to the judge it "wasn't me that did the damage me lord". An owner of an XL, or any potentially aggressive dog is in the same position as a careless gun owner. Legally responsible at all times.

The current law already holds owners liable if their dog injures or kills someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...