Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Fck off I genuinely want to learn I'm not having 25 thl spackers walking behind us taking the piss 🤣🖕

There's a record setting on teams, we regularly record meetings (tell everyone before hand) as it saves making notes during the meeting, pass the recording on and everyone has a record. Said a fe

I'm on a couple of big cat sightings pages on Facebook.  80% of the pictures and videos are from idiots who can't see its obviously a normal cat , 10% is people posting insane good footage of cats cla

Posted Images

52 minutes ago, Daniel cain said:
WWW.NWEMAIL.CO.UK

Kath Hayhurst from Burton-in-Kendal discovered a deceased 'big cat' in Dalton in 2008.

 

Big domestic or Kellas would be my guess on that the black leopard type we are looking at are normally over 30” of body alone with almost the same in tail length would have been worth the cost of a dna test just to find out if they hadn’t binned it 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27/05/2024 at 16:52, Franks dad said:

Perhaps The bloke was Chinese and the dog’s  called razor ? 🤔

No way mate, you know the rules, don't name something you're going to eat! Lol

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Greyman said:

Big domestic or Kellas would be my guess on that the black leopard type we are looking at are normally over 30” of body alone with almost the same in tail length would have been worth the cost of a dna test just to find out if they hadn’t binned it 

Looks just like a kellas or the feral cats like in the tv program that had come from a long line of ferals  that  had a dominant black gene ? They had got quite tall .

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Daniel cain said:
WWW.NWEMAIL.CO.UK

Kath Hayhurst from Burton-in-Kendal discovered a deceased 'big cat' in Dalton in 2008.

 

If you look close at the pic it looks edited around the neck area to me and surely if you were taking a picture of something you thought was unusually large there would be something for scale in there too?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gnipper said:

If you look close at the pic it looks edited around the neck area to me and surely if you were taking a picture of something you thought was unusually large there would be something for scale in there too?

I would of liked to see something next to it for scale👍

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, gnipper said:

If you look close at the pic it looks edited around the neck area to me and surely if you were taking a picture of something you thought was unusually large there would be something for scale in there too?

Simply putting your foot next to it and taking the picture would have helped 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Daniel cain said:
WWW.NWEMAIL.CO.UK

Kath Hayhurst from Burton-in-Kendal discovered a deceased 'big cat' in Dalton in 2008.

 

22 inches from ears to tip of it's tail is not a big cat I think we all agree on that. But it does look very long in the leg. The media don't help when they start spouting Big Cat at 22 inches theres moggies around here that size.

Cheers Arry

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, gnipper said:

If you look close at the pic it looks edited around the neck area to me and surely if you were taking a picture of something you thought was unusually large there would be something for scale in there too?

Your very suspicious of things it’s quite funny really, the guy was an 86 year old historian and the picture was taken 16 years ago, so you have to ask yourself why would an 86 year old set out to deceive everyone then wait 16 years to spring his  coupe it’s more ridiculous than accepting there are leopards in the English countryside, it’s all about probability and in all probably he wouldn’t have been able to lift a big cat into the boot of his car as a dead weight and would probably have struggled getting it in the dustbin he would have also if he wanted to fool people probably claimed a larger size than 22” which is a moggy so in all probability just a bit old and confused 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Daniel cain said:

Was it 22" long or tts?

Said in that article 22" from ears to the tip of its tail. That don't seem large I'm wondering if it meant 22" from ears to the base of the tail. that would be a fare moggie.

Cheers Arry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Arry said:

Said in that article 22" from ears to the tip of its tail. That don't seem large I'm wondering if it meant 22" from ears to the base of the tail. that would be a fare moggie.

Cheers Arry

I,m thinking the same thing it certainly wouldn’t have been worth picturing or mentioning if it was tip of tail the Kellas cat is a feral x Scottish wildcat that seems to be breeding quite true to type the dead one found on the road in Scotland last year was around 3ft long and though the body was quickly cleared away there was enough bits left on the verge to get a DNA sample that confirmed it was a black wild cat hybrid 

3588BE27-92AF-475D-AB01-0B2DBA431FC5.png

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...