My mate

[Greyman 28,439]

The problem with that paper is the sources it uses, ie defra who were responsible for covering up the first positive dna results in 2011/12 when they issued there D notice they also employed somebody when they were known as MAFFS to capture large non indigenous carnivores as they called it then ,  then you have the inclusion of Danny Brampton not someone I’ve met personally but someone who’s name i here regularly and who I would be very sceptical of, but it’s also interesting how it reinforces the beliefs of the sceptics so is taken as gospel no question, the human zoo is almost as interesting as the wild one 

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

6 hours ago, Greyman said:

The problem with that paper is the sources it uses, ie defra who were responsible for covering up the first positive dna results in 2011/12 when they issued there D notice they also employed somebody when they were known as MAFFS to capture large non indigenous carnivores as they called it then ,  then you have the inclusion of Danny Brampton not someone I’ve met personally but someone who’s name i here regularly and who I would be very sceptical of, but it’s also interesting how it reinforces the beliefs of the sceptics so is taken as gospel no question, the human zoo is almost as interesting as the wild one 

No different to your beliefs reinforced by things you see that other people see differently .

 

 

 

[mackem 26,440]

6 minutes ago, foxdropper said:

No different to your beliefs reinforced by things you see that other people see differently .

I think a new scientist paper holds more weight than an independent film company with a big cat documentary looking for a platform to screen it.

it’s interesting how the “DNA” sourced reinforces the beliefs of the believers and is taken as gospel no questions asked (two sides to every coin).

[EDDIE B 3,166]

3 hours ago, mackem said:

I think a new scientist paper holds more weight than an independent film company with a big cat documentary looking for a platform to screen it.

it’s interesting how the “DNA” sourced reinforces the beliefs of the believers and is taken as gospel no questions asked (two sides to every coin).

I was reading a page on Reddit, on this topic, and it was just like here. A few believers, who just took everything at face value, but most were asking the same questions we are, and got no real answers.

Edited June 15, 2023 by EDDIE B

[mackem 26,440]

7 minutes ago, EDDIE B said:

I was reading a page on Reddit, on this topic, and it was just like here. A few believers, who just took everything at face value, but most were asking the same questions we are, and got no real answers.

Here’s pics of big cats taken in Britain that have been put up today by cat cultists…..

(yes,I know).

 

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

2 minutes ago, EDDIE B said:

I was reading a page on Reddit, on this topic, and it was just like here. A few believers, who just took everything at face value, but most were asking the same questions we are, and got no real answers.

They won’t mate .Answers arnt there  to satisfy rational persons .

We’ve just about seen all there is to see and still nothing .Few pics outstanding lol,yet unseen but I guess that’s part of the big reveal .

[shaaark 10,752]

33 minutes ago, mackem said:

Here’s pics of big cats taken in Britain that have been put up today by cat cultists…..

(yes,I know).

 

Top and bottom pics are the same, moggy.

Middle pic looks to be a melanistic roe doe, certainly NOT a cat of any description lol.

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Same moggy ,lol.You trippin .

[EDDIE B 3,166]

2 minutes ago, shaaark said:

Top and bottom pics are the same, moggy.

Middle pic looks to be a melanistic roe doe, certainly NOT a cat of any description lol.

Thought the bottom one was a sheep dog

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

1 minute ago, EDDIE B said:

Thought the bottom one was a sheep dog

This is what rational persons are up against mate .That’s already a cat for 10 % those viewing lol.mint .

[mackem 26,440]

3 minutes ago, EDDIE B said:

Thought the bottom one was a sheep dog

Looks like a border collie. 

[shaaark 10,752]

48 minutes ago, mackem said:

Here’s pics of big cats taken in Britain that have been put up today by cat cultists…..

(yes,I know).

 

Could you put the details, source, time, location etc of those pics up, Mack?

[mackem 26,440]

3 minutes ago, shaaark said:

Could you put the details, source, time, location etc of those pics up, Mack?

Supposed to be up Scotland, bloke hasn't given the time,he put them up on a big cat forum. 

[shaaark 10,752]

1 minute ago, mackem said:

Supposed to be up Scotland, bloke hasn't given the time,he put them up on a big cat forum. 

OK, so same bloke all 3 pics?

Top and bottom pics are the same thing, border collie or not, bottom pic is blurry as f**k.

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

I know it’s been a while since we’ve seen a cat outline so just to refresh ,here tis .So there’s no confusion like ….lol