Who's swearing allegience to Charles ?.

[iworkwhippets 12,550]

Even the gerrys here have top of the range phones, im struggling wi an owd nokia, we a pull up antenna , 

[dogmandont 9,821]

A fortune spent on the privileged while public services are cut back to the bare bones is fcuking wrong and anyone supporting it is a useful idiot for the establishment. 

Thought a few more on here would be a bit more switched on with the way they talk on here. 

[Bakerboy 4,736]

1 hour ago, dogmandont said:

A fortune spent on the privileged while public services are cut back to the bare bones is fcuking wrong and anyone supporting it is a useful idiot for the establishment. 

Thought a few more on here would be a bit more switched on with the way they talk on here. 

I think most realise that mate, its the alternative that fills most people with dread, I would personally rather the head of state be a monarchy like our Royal family than an elected head of state, I dont want a  Tony Blair, Boris Johnson type head of state or God forbid a Doreen Lawrence, sadiq khan or even celebrity types, we're gonna be paying for them whoever is in the job

[tatsblisters 9,721]

A few subby van drivers who work for a middle man at work were moaning about having to take a day off unpaid for the coronation and i didn't help by saying i bet you were glued to the telly watching it with your little union jack flags the response started with the letter F and ended with F . lol

[jukel123 8,017]

15 minutes ago, Bakerboy said:

I think most realise that mate, its the alternative that fills most people with dread, I would personally rather the head of state be a monarchy like our Royal family than an elected head of state, I dont want a  Tony Blair, Boris Johnson type head of state or God forbid a Doreen Lawrence, sadiq khan or even celebrity types, we're gonna be paying for them whoever is in the job

How about Mick Lynch for head of state?

[Bakerboy 4,736]

26 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

How about Mick Lynch for head of state?

Or ol' Scargill perhaps

 

[dogmandont 9,821]

1 hour ago, Bakerboy said:

I think most realise that mate, its the alternative that fills most people with dread, I would personally rather the head of state be a monarchy like our Royal family than an elected head of state, I dont want a  Tony Blair, Boris Johnson type head of state or God forbid a Doreen Lawrence, sadiq khan or even celebrity types, we're gonna be paying for them whoever is in the job

No difference in any of those you've mentioned and the monarchy bb, all establishment pigs with their snouts in the publics money troth. 

They piss our money up the wall all while cutting every service to the bone including education for our kids, healthcare, the list goes on and on, it just doesn't sit right with me. 

[Bakerboy 4,736]

1 minute ago, dogmandont said:

No difference in any of those you've mentioned and the monarchy bb, all establishment pigs with their snouts in the publics money troth. 

They piss our money up the wall all while cutting every service to the bone including education for our kids, healthcare, the list goes on and on, it just doesn't sit right with me. 

Doesnt sit right with me mate but i prefer the former ( Monarchy ) to the latter ( elected ), I dont know the figures but I believe with money coming in the monarchy are  as good as self funding money in money out type of thing, but I daresay lefties and republicans will always have reasons to oppose them,(last bit not aimed at you personally)

[scotty12 1,988]

58 minutes ago, dogmandont said:

No difference in any of those you've mentioned and the monarchy bb, all establishment pigs with their snouts in the publics money troth. 

They piss our money up the wall all while cutting every service to the bone including education for our kids, healthcare, the list goes on and on, it just doesn't sit right with me. 

I bet these weren’t cheap eithere 

[Francie, 2,195]

Charles is a lying hpyocrite an has just given royal assent for gene edited food an f***ing animals an it doesnt have to be on the labels so well not know a f**k what were eating in the uk,so all his bollocks of him being against gene editing an gmo was lies as we all knew anyway,charles doing what hes told by the world economic forum an swab

Royal Assent opens door to gene edited food in UK  | Laboratory News

WWW.LABNEWS.CO.UK

---

The granting of Royal Assent for the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act has...

 

[TRUEBRIT66 1,527]

4 hours ago, dogmandont said:

A fortune spent on the privileged while public services are cut back to the bare bones is fcuking wrong and anyone supporting it is a useful idiot for the establishment. 

Thought a few more on here would be a bit more switched on with the way they talk on here. 

Costs the average tax payer £1.30 a year for the monarchy.

Way I see it I've worked 40yrs so thats around £52. I've had 4 paid extra bank holidays at around £200 a day (apologies to the self employed) in the last 2 years I've made £748 and had extra time with my family, so more than happy.

Now if the government said we are disbanding the monarchy and every penny will go back to the British tax payer and public services will benefit I would be the first one to vote them out, but we all know that money would go to lining the nest of the politicians and the parasites that leach of this country. 

Its shit its wrong but I wouldnt say that view makes me a idiot!              

[gnasher16 30,118]

On 09/05/2023 at 14:05, jukel123 said:

Plenty of right wingers oppose the monarchy. There's a clip on GB news on YouTube showing right winger John Clees pissing himself laughing at the coronation. He's not the only right winger who thinks this way. But I accept more leftists oppose the monarchy than the right.

Personally, I believe if certain people want to ogle at the Windsors then let them.  But I resent the principle that we have to pay for it. That's a real twist of the dagger for me.

The words 'left winger' have been twisted by the right wing media to primarily mean LGBT people, environment campaigners  sabs and God knows what else.

True left wingers are into issues like the NHS, improved pay and conditions,  decent pensions and affordable housing. Lefties believe in the unions and point to  the tremendous, life changing benefits won by union members over the last century and more. They oppose monstrosities like zero hour  contracts and tent cities.

There's no doubt that living standards, the NHS ( including dentistry) and   housing stock have fallen back over the last 13 years of tory rule. Its no coincidence that  union membership  has declined as  the tories have  prospered. They now have a free run to do what they like with the unions  too weak to oppose them. The really visible of evidence of tory refusal to fund public  services are the roads. The number of potholes make our roads akin to third world roads. But all our public services are in a similar condition. The tories don't give a f**k about the NHS and schools because they use private hospitals and schools. The UK is one of a tiny minority of countries to privatise its water. The result has been millions paid out shareholders and raw sewage regularly discharged into rivers and estuaries. No wonder salmon are in swift decline when they are swimming amongst turds, sanitary towels and contraceptives. The Environment agency may as well not exist as it has no powers to stop this practice.

The rich however have done very well under the tories. Stats show they have prospered. That's what the tory party is for...the rich. They have no respect for the poor. Of all the things that annoyed me about party gate  including the  chucking of millions of pounds to their mates, was some tory twat telling the cleaners to " f**k off" after they had  complained about vomit and blood stains on the walls of no 10 after an almighty tory piss up during Covid. That really incensed me...bullying a cleaner. Probably a female cleaner. But that's where we are at. That's the way our pin stripe suited public schoolboys  have been taught think about working class people.A government which acts like a criminal gang, looking after their own members and putting two fingers up to the rest of us.

The tories have opposed every step forward the working class has  ever achieved from pensions, affordable  council housing  to the NHS to the minimum wage . They have spent the last 13 years running down our public services from libraries to swimming pools to the NHS, Education, roads and environmental standards.

 

 

A pro Labour supporter with not one single mention of immigration......whos ever heard of such a thing !

It doesnt take a clever person to see that the Tories and everything else that was once considered  " right " has taken a huge shift along to the left leaving the traditional right to be viewed " far right " with all the frenzied revulsion that incurs !

It hasnt happened by coincidence,the left can no longer blame the right and vice versa as they are one and the same,both as warped and sickly as each other imo.

[dogmandont 9,821]

1 hour ago, TRUEBRIT66 said:

Costs the average tax payer £1.30 a year for the monarchy.

Way I see it I've worked 40yrs so thats around £52. I've had 4 paid extra bank holidays at around £200 a day (apologies to the self employed) in the last 2 years I've made £748 and had extra time with my family, so more than happy.

Now if the government said we are disbanding the monarchy and every penny will go back to the British tax payer and public services will benefit I would be the first one to vote them out, but we all know that money would go to lining the nest of the politicians and the parasites that leach of this country. 

Its shit its wrong but I wouldnt say that view makes me a idiot!              

The way I see it is that the system only works one way and that is to keep the establishment and their cronies well fed at the thoth, yes I know it's the way it's always been but it's wrong from the top to the bottom, the monarchy is just another leach hanging on the throat of every day ordinary working people, a parasite just like the government that doesn't give a Fcuk about it's people. No difference in them. 

[jukel123 8,017]

7 hours ago, gnasher16 said:

A pro Labour supporter with not one single mention of immigration......whos ever heard of such a thing !

It doesnt take a clever person to see that the Tories and everything else that was once considered  " right " has taken a huge shift along to the left leaving the traditional right to be viewed " far right " with all the frenzied revulsion that incurs !

It hasnt happened by coincidence,the left can no longer blame the right and vice versa as they are one and the same,both as warped and sickly as each other imo.

The thread was about the legitimacy of the monarchy, not immigration.  But if you want my thoughts on immigration, and political party support, I am pro old Labour which represented the working class, not keen on Bliar's or Starmer's new Labour.

I voted for Brexit to stop uncontrolled immigration. There was too much pressure on housing, the NHS ...and wages were kept low by a continual supply of cheap labour.

Nothing against immigrants or their skin colour , that's the  preoccupation of the right or the far right. But  I am not in favour of uncontrolled immigration. The UK's infrastructure just cannot cope.

Not too keen on German,Russian and Greek immigrants who take massive state handouts just to dress up for us and occasionally cut a ribbon.

 They are clever though,they even change their surname to disguise their German ancestry. They are parasites on hard working true brits imo.

'

Edited May 11, 2023 by jukel123

[Dinosaurs 2,058]

If something was to happen to Will I assume Harry steps in But if he’s not Charles son & is Hewitts would he have to have a DNA test & results made public. If he’s not Charles who would be nxt inline. I can’t believe they haven’t already had him tested. Not trying to upset any royalists on here just curious. Atb