censorship. ...yet again by our mods

[Chid 6,508]

Just now, Francie, said:

Paulas would you take the french mod hunting with you if you still hunted,lets say you had no written perm,would you take him with you?

No that wouldn't be hunting it would be poaching .

I'd take him out hunting on permission,

[king 11,972]

16 minutes ago, South hams hunter said:

Why would I push the report button?  You're making an assumption because I don't agree with you and don't see the issue with hull being banned 

Tell me why did mchull deserve to be banned then..what did he do the warrant a ban ??

[South hams hunter 8,921]

4 minutes ago, lurcherman 887 said:

 

 

Still hanging out for a position mate

Don't want 1

3 minutes ago, Francie, said:

And,theres been spys or touts in plenty of places for years still not noticed,would you take him hunting with you?

No but I also wouldn't take you or 90% out unless we had a mutual friend that could vouch for them

[Nicepix 5,650]

The threads were closed for a reason. Not the smartest thing to reopen them.

[king 11,972]

Just now, South hams hunter said:

Don't want 1

No but I also wouldn't take you or 90% out unless we had a mutual friend that could vouch for them

So you wouldn't take someone out to play with a crab line unless someone vouched for them

[walshie 2,804]

33 minutes ago, South hams hunter said:

Half of them weren't mods when it was going on, it was just walshie and he left it to run for page after page of abuse in all directions. 

 

Thanks for bringing me into it. I don't read every comment on every page, but I have dealt with every report I've read. Damned for moderating, damned for not moderating. 

[South hams hunter 8,921]

47 minutes ago, walshie said:

Thanks for bringing me into it. I don't read every comment on every page, but I have dealt with every report I've read. Damned for moderating, damned for not moderating. 

Sorry that was poorly worded; should have said you were the only active mod at the time. 

It would obviously run for pages unless you were here 24/7

[walshie 2,804]

Just now, South hams hunter said:

Sorry that was poorly worded; should have said you were the only active mod at the time. 

It would obviously run for pages unless you were here 24/7

No probs. 

[NEWKID 27,132]

Surely it obvious what the problem is...

 

Socks as a mod ffs!!

[lurcherman 887 13,095]

Thanks 

[South hams hunter 8,921]

2 hours ago, king said:

So you wouldn't take someone out to play with a crab line unless someone vouched for them

No I wouldn't take people to marks that have took me years to learn; especially not knobheads

[Francie, 2,154]

2 hours ago, Nicepix said:

The threads were closed for a reason. Not the smartest thing to reopen them.

Tough luck its open

[Greyman 28,261]

2 hours ago, king said:

Tell me why did mchull deserve to be banned then..what did he do the warrant a ban ??

Bought a saluki

[Francie, 2,154]

2 hours ago, South hams hunter said:

Don't want 1

No but I also wouldn't take you or 90% out unless we had a mutual friend that could vouch for them

Theres a few on here iv met in person an been gifted pups from, can we say the same for the other person, has he been vouched for?

[South hams hunter 8,921]

1 minute ago, Francie, said:

Theres a few on here iv met in person an been gifted pups from, can we say the same for the other person, has he been vouched for?

That's your choice but I wouldn't take out any Tom, dick or Harry especially if things weren't 100% above board