mackem 27,331 Posted December 14, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littlefish 587 Posted December 14, 2022 Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 Did they take the survivors back to France or onwards to UK? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bakerboy 4,736 Posted December 14, 2022 Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 1 hour ago, littlefish said: Did they take the survivors back to France or onwards to UK? How many guesses do I get 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
.357shooter 1,242 Posted December 14, 2022 Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 so why would anyone pay thousands of pounds to come here illegally ?.the obvious answer is because they are criminals.no checks because no id simple. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,331 Posted December 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 419 hotels filled in UK so far. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 17, 2022 Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 On 14/12/2022 at 20:44, .357shooter said: so why would anyone pay thousands of pounds to come here illegally ?.the obvious answer is because they are criminals.no checks because no id simple. And there is the elephant in the room, Its not about stopping the people smugglers or gangs, The reason is why are people willing to pay large amounts of money and face the danger involved in these crossings, Understand this and the problem can be solved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DIDO.1 22,845 Posted December 17, 2022 Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 UNICEF have an advert 'children are suffering because of conflict in Ukraine ' ......then they show these photos to highlight the suffering Not sure they look like genuine Ukrainian refugees Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,331 Posted December 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 I honestly wonder what % of genuine rescues the RNLI do against the channel taxi runs. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 17, 2022 Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 6 minutes ago, DIDO.1 said: UNICEF have an advert 'children are suffering because of conflict in Ukraine ' ......then they show these photos to highlight the suffering Not sure they look like genuine Ukrainian refugees I think that was immigrant workers trying to leave Before the war had actually started, When only women and children were allowed to evacuate the cities. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bakerboy 4,736 Posted December 17, 2022 Report Share Posted December 17, 2022 48 minutes ago, mackem said: I honestly wonder what % of genuine rescues the RNLI do against the channel taxi runs. Doubt they've got time for any genuine stuff now and the immigrant stuff probably more lucrative 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gypsydog94 4,609 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Share Posted December 19, 2022 UK plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is legal, High Court rules | JOE.co.uk WWW.JOE.CO.UK UK plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is legal, High Court rules Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bakerboy 4,736 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Share Posted December 19, 2022 3 minutes ago, Gypsydog94 said: UK plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is legal, High Court rules | JOE.co.uk WWW.JOE.CO.UK UK plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is legal, High Court rules Let's hope they crack on with it double quick 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 24,392 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Share Posted December 19, 2022 Sounds good, but the judges added a proviso.......each individual case had to be considered before deportation, and as long as we are still in the ECHR the lefties lawyers will appeal and it will all start again. I don't think anyone will be deported to Rwanda, the government just think the threat of it will deter people from coming here, but I doubt it will Cheers. 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Share Posted December 19, 2022 1 hour ago, chartpolski said: Sounds good, but the judges added a proviso.......each individual case had to be considered before deportation, and as long as we are still in the ECHR the lefties lawyers will appeal and it will all start again. I don't think anyone will be deported to Rwanda, the government just think the threat of it will deter people from coming here, but I doubt it will Cheers. There will be at least two more legal challenges to the ruling made today, ending with a decision from the supreme Court, But that's just about the legality of sending them to Rwanda. As you say the second part of todays ruling found that the UK government had not considered the eight cases the court looked at, correctly, This opens the gates for the charities and Human rights lawyer's supporting these so called asylum seekers to drag it out even further. When the Rwanda thing was first announced not a single boat crossed the channel for three weeks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 24,392 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Share Posted December 19, 2022 It will go to the Court of Appeal, and then to the Supreme Court, then the ECHR will say it's illegal and back to square one ! As long as the ECHR can over rule our courts it will never happen. Theres no politician in the UK, from any party, that will make the decision to either leave or ignore the ECHR. Sunak was asked today if the High Court ruling would mean illegal immigrants could start to be deported to Rwanda before the next General election, and he couldn't give an answer. When Labour win the next election, which looks increasingly likely, it will all be a moot point anyway, as far from deporting illegals, Labour will be welcoming them in !!! Cheers. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.