mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 3 minutes ago, WILF said: I also think you overlook the fundamental differences between the U.K. and the US in that post, Your 100% wrong there WILF, I only mentioned the UK because charts introduced it into the equation 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 6 minutes ago, WILF said: Add to that America has 300,000,000 people compared to 70,000, 000 in the U.K. We just can’t make a comparison like that imho I have been to the states enough to realise the difference between it and blighty 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,141 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 Just now, Gene said: I think the easy access of assault rifles is a big contributing factor that people refuse to accept yep.. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 Is there one single civilised country in the world with a similar rate of mass shootings? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 (edited) 43 minutes ago, chartpolski said: I don't know the answer to this.....the UK banned handguns and made all other firearms very hard to get, but that didn't stop the atrocities. The Manchester Arena bombing was done with ingredients that can be bought at Asda and B & Q. Anyone who is fanatical enough can kill numbers of people in many ways, like driving an HGV into a crowd, building a bomb, running amok with a blade. Of course, the ease with which guns are available in America is a huge contributing factor, but would banning guns stop the fanatical nutter ? I doubt it, but it might make it harder for them. Identifying and acting swiftly against the fanatics could be the answer, how many of these killers were already known to the security services, even on watch lists, but not arrested because of "human rights", fear of being accused of racism, etc ? As I said, I don't have an answer......I doubt anyone has. Cheers. I think there is a nasty habit in the media and that is promoted by government to look for every answer except the obvious…… Take the late David Amiss MP for example, there was all sorts of talk about mental illness, fanaticism etc etc……a bit like the Manchester Arena bombing. But the answer imho is simple, they let these people in with minimal checks to a society and a culture they are completely at odds with and if they wasn’t here it wouldn’t be happening !……least not by them. And seeing as historically (pre 1960s) people wasn’t going about stabbing MPs and blowing up teenagers then the proof is there. Same as when some random youth go’s mental with an AR15, this wasn’t happening pre 1960 when people had hope and a culture to cling to and black and white boundaries of morals and a social contract……it’s only happening since we did away with that stuff. Edited June 2, 2022 by WILF 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 10 minutes ago, mackem said: Your 100% wrong there WILF, I only mentioned the UK because charts introduced it into the equation Fair enough mate, I must have misunderstood Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 1 minute ago, Gene said: People just need to accept that it's a fact, offering replies like well they'd use a knife, or a bus, perhaps a bomb are just red herrings IMO. I don't know the answer but I also don't understand why they want assault rifles over there but hey ho. I know banning unfairly effects law abiding citizens but what is more important to you, your child or your gun? You miss the point completely imho mate, the question is “what next after your gun ?” (Or your kitchen knife or legally held shotgun or beer glass etc etc etc ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 1 minute ago, WILF said: Fair enough mate, I must have misunderstood It's true though mate, no mass killings in the UK on a daily basis, one+ mass shooting in the States a day because of the gun laws and how the people are wired up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 US Supreme Court wants to expand citizens gun rights. As Biden and lawmakers debate, U.S. Supreme Court poised to expand gun rights WWW.REUTERS.COM As President Joe Biden and Congress ponder how to respond to the latest U.S. mass... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,141 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 yeh you can look at the complicated version.....and think about the cycology of all this... but lets get real... man/nutcase walks in to gun shop/walmart.etc...buys high powered assault rifle.... walks in to school and blows a classroom away.... seems pretty straightforward to me 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 4 minutes ago, mackem said: It's true though mate, no mass killings in the UK on a daily basis, one+ mass shooting in the States a day because of the gun laws and how the people are wired up. I understand that mate and I fully take your point However, I still just think we are talking about numbers when in reality we should be talking about why ? The U.K. with all its gun laws (which I happen to think it actually gets just about right) still has mass killings, maybe not in the same numbers but it still has them and they have not all been terror related. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 12 minutes ago, Gene said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_tower_shooting And ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 1 minute ago, WILF said: And ? Read a few articles on Charles Whitman, didn't they find a tumour on his brain or was that another guy? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,796 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 1 minute ago, mackem said: Read a few articles on Charles Whitman, didn't they find a tumour on his brain or was that another guy? I don’t know mate, I know of him but I have never read any detail on him. I have read a fair bit on the like of Kemper and people like him but nothing really on spree or single incident mass killers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,413 Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 Just recapped, he did have a tumour pressuring his amygdala,affecting his emotional responses. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.