Russia Ukraine WW3

[THE STIFFMEISTER 15,840]

20 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

say listen putin we’re sorry for been a lying nation of wrong uns i’m not interested in nato you can have your buffer zone we agreed on 30 year ago 

as easy as that mate 

Mate are you serious you pair ? 
 

apologise for what ? 

[mC HULL 12,432]

3 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Mate are you serious you pair ? 
 

apologise for what ? 

for expanding past germany something as a country the usa said they wouldn’t do 

[Greyman 28,392]

8 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

That doesn’t stop the war though 

as for the usual hokum you spout , have you been to the Russian border ? 

Just got back about an hour ago lol

[THE STIFFMEISTER 15,840]

2 hours ago, Greyman said:

Just got back about an hour ago lol

More weed infused fantasy ? 

[keepdiggin 9,559]

Please forgive my ignorance but can trump pull out of nato after all the times the US needed backing in Afghanistan and Iraq?

[chartpolski 23,471]

5 minutes ago, keepdiggin said:

Please forgive my ignorance but can trump pull out of nato after all the times the US needed backing in Afghanistan and Iraq?

The US doesn’t need military backing when it goes to war. They only need the political backing of allies, and they don’t REALLY need that either. It just makes their decision to go to war look more acceptable .

Cheers.

[keepdiggin 9,559]

48 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

The US doesn’t need military backing when it goes to war. They only need the political backing of allies, and they don’t REALLY need that either. It just makes their decision to go to war look more acceptable .

Cheers.

Thanks for the reply

[Greyman 28,392]

 

[mC HULL 12,432]

5 minutes ago, keepdiggin said:

Thanks for the reply

it’s anothe illusion makes it look like all the country’s have deciding to go plunder and pillage together when in reality america do what they want when they want all the allies are just doing what they are told the usa is the tyrant 

[mC HULL 12,432]

work this out nato funding and ready to go to war for ukraine a non nato member 

the argies take the falklands nato do nothing that’s a nato member   invaded 

 

 

[WILF 46,784]

8 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

work this out nato funding and ready to go to war for ukraine a non nato member 

the argies take the falklands nato do nothing that’s a nato member   invaded 

 

 

Actually, that’s a point I’d never considered mate….fair one.

In fact as I remember they were sinking our ships and burning our men with French Aircraft and missiles and the United States didn’t want to really get involved because obviously Argentina is in their continent.

 

[chartpolski 23,471]

3 minutes ago, WILF said:

Actually, that’s a point I’d never considered mate….fair one.

In fact as I remember they were sinking our ships and burning our men with French Aircraft and missiles and the United States didn’t want to really get involved because obviously Argentina is in their continent.

 

The simple answer is that the NATO treaty is only applicable in the northern hemisphere, north of the Tropic of Cancer.

The UK couldn’t invoke Article Five as it didn’t apply .

Also , we didn’t need any help.

The Argentinians had French Exocet missile before the war and the “fact” that France kept supplying them during the war had been debunked.

America offered us the use of one of their aircraft carriers in the event of our Through Deck Cruiser, HMS Invincible, being sunk.

Cheers.

[mC HULL 12,432]

59 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

The simple answer is that the NATO treaty is only applicable in the northern hemisphere, north of the Tropic of Cancer.

The UK couldn’t invoke Article Five as it didn’t apply .

Also , we didn’t need any help.

The Argentinians had French Exocet missile before the war and the “fact” that France kept supplying them during the war had been debunked.

America offered us the use of one of their aircraft carriers in the event of our Through Deck Cruiser, HMS Invincible, being sunk.

Cheers.

lol so if russia attacked new zealand nato would get involved a nato member under attack could they invoke article 5 

[WILF 46,784]

1 hour ago, chartpolski said:

The simple answer is that the NATO treaty is only applicable in the northern hemisphere, north of the Tropic of Cancer.

The UK couldn’t invoke Article Five as it didn’t apply .

Also , we didn’t need any help.

The Argentinians had French Exocet missile before the war and the “fact” that France kept supplying them during the war had been debunked.

America offered us the use of one of their aircraft carriers in the event of our Through Deck Cruiser, HMS Invincible, being sunk.

Cheers.

Well there you go, they say every day is a school day and that’s some things I have learned today.

Much obliged mate 

[chartpolski 23,471]

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

lol so if russia attacked new zealand nato would get involved a nato member under attack could they invoke article 5 

New Zealand isn’t a member of NATO .

NATO members would probably get involved but not under the auspices of the NATO treaty.

Just do some basic research , it’s all there on Google ! LOL !

Cheers,