20 years

[Neobliviscaris1776 1,998]

9 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

I love how we're expected to suspend disbelief to consider that this would have to play out in total secrecy. As I'm sure your considerable research into this has revealed the scope of such a mission. Months if not years of planning. Ripping apart walls to remove material and place charges. Miles upon miles of det cord and the intentional damaging of support structure.

In two buildings.

At night, so as not to arouse the suspicion of over 50,000 workers and round the clock security.

All while being able to avoid routine patrols by animals specifically trained to detect explosives.

But you're absolutely right, mate. It couldn't have possibly been what we all saw on the TV.

At least you're admitting you're a conspiracy lad... now just to let us know you're trolling!

I do have to ask at this point. Do you have the one conspiracy surrounding the WTC or is a collection of happy conspiratorial coincidences?

2001-1993 = 8 years of planning if that's what happened. 

It's like pulling teeth this...give up Chris you've met your match

[Neobliviscaris1776 1,998]

14 minutes ago, king said:

Not an expert by any means..Well you had me fooled then because you come across as an expert on any thread on here..

I think it hurts everyone's brain cells on the whole forum.the amount of pure nonsense that you spout to be honest..

Tell me how long have you researched the 911 terror attack for I'm guessing about 20yrs non stop..and how did you manage to research covid 19 and the Middle East in that time..

One life...live it. 

[king 11,972]

2 minutes ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

2001-1993 = 8 years of planning if that's what happened. 

It's like pulling teeth this...give up Chris you've met your match

Tell us what do you think occurred in the years leading to the twin towers collapsing 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

2 minutes ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

2001-1993 = 8 years of planning if that's what happened. 

It's like pulling teeth this...give up Chris you've met your match

But that didn't happen.

I don't want to change your mind, mate. I honestly don't really care on how you view your reality.

I just want you to admit you're trolling!

 

[mushroom 12,997]

21 hours ago, mC HULL said:

i thought the twin towers was built to withstand been hit by a plane 

would jet fuel burn hot enough to melt steel wilf 

Steel structures are coated in fire retardant foam. Apparently parts of the steel frame had been left uncoated.

10 hours ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

Jet fuel CANNOT melt stainless steel structural columns

Yes it can! Not on it's own granted but as a catalyst and then the subsequent fire, absolutely. 

8 hours ago, SheepChaser said:

I still find it mental that folk believe it was a cut and dry terrorist attack. There are so many questionable bits tht if you think that we got the whole story you have to be painfully naive. Look at the pentagon ‘plane’, there was zero chance that was a plane. No doubt some terrorists flew some planes into two towers but there was much much much more to it. Look what the fire fighters found in the buildings, look at the timing of the charges being rigged to drop them etc.

As for governments now killing their own citizens, they have been doing that for a long long long time. 
 

 

CIA and LSD spring to mind

6 hours ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

Stainless steel melts at 2750 degrees Fahrenheit.

Jet fuel burns from 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.

Science and facts lads

You don't use stainless steel to build buildings or skyscraper frameworks. You use steel, which melts at 1300 and summat °C. In an enclosed space with plenty of oxygen and fuel that fire would have hit way above 2000°C. The steel would've buckled and failed at around 1100°C, with the weight of the floors above.

Edited September 12, 2021 by mushroom

[Greb147 6,809]

5 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

Shit I forgot that bit... What an elaborate coverup by the Rothschilds!

Which makes me think we didn't they just crash multiple plains in to the buildings and save over a decade of fake rewiring? 

[Neobliviscaris1776 1,998]

4 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

Shit I forgot that bit... What an elaborate coverup by the Rothschilds!

That's classified Chris, how did you know that?

[Greb147 6,809]

1 minute ago, king said:

Tell us what do you think occurred in the years leading to the twin towers collapsing 

They planned it, he has no ideas but it sounds good. 

[Neobliviscaris1776 1,998]

2 minutes ago, king said:

Tell us what do you think occurred in the years leading to the twin towers collapsing 

Read between the lines mate...I've carried you far enough

[king 11,972]

2 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

They planned it, he has no ideas but it sounds good. 

It's not often an expert has no idea mate on there chosen subject..

[king 11,972]

3 minutes ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

Read between the lines mate...I've carried you far enough

Tell me do you consume class A drugs at the weekend..

[Greb147 6,809]

4 minutes ago, Neobliviscaris1776 said:

Read between the lines mate...I've carried you far enough

 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

3 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

Which makes me think we didn't they just crash multiple plains in to the buildings and save over a decade of fake rewiring? 

Why not just stick with the two?

Pre-Patriot Act administrations actually cared about federal spending. Imagine having to bribe all those people to stay quiet at the arse end of the Clinton administration!

[Greb147 6,809]

Just now, ChrisJones said:

Why not just stick with the two?

Pre-Patriot Act administrations actually cared about federal spending. Imagine having to bribe all those people to stay quiet at the arse end of the Clinton administration!

Because 4 or 5 would have levelled the things there and then with no comebacks off the conspiracy theorists about controlled explosions, well apart from the hologram theory. 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

1 minute ago, Greb147 said:

Because 4 or 5 would have levelled the things there and then with no comebacks off the conspiracy theorists about controlled explosions, well apart from the hologram theory. 

Maybe they could've just towed an inflatable plane, each, behind the main ones? Then maybe it would have looked like four, but was only two, and the conspiracy lads would have something to occupy them for several decades.