9/11 twin towers

[South hams hunter 8,921]

13 minutes ago, SONOFSOIL said:

I dont trouble myself with what hit the buildings, but i sure as hell know it wasnt a group of pakis on flight 11 and 77

And you know this how? 

[South hams hunter 8,921]

19 minutes ago, Daniel cain said:

You could jump in the broom cupboard with your own little gang of Walter Mitty's and wank them off with your lips

I could do, I'll probably just go fishing 

[Greb147 6,809]

Some folk clearly have a hologram for a brain.

 

[SONOFSOIL 215]

1 minute ago, TOMO said:

not really ...i believe two planes crashed in to them....f****d if i know who the drivers were....im open to governments letting it happen to maybe start a war.....but i really dont believe they were holagrams

I dont go with it or against it, but i do know that aluminium and jet fuel alone could not turn the twin towers to dust before they hit the ground

[Greb147 6,809]

1 minute ago, SONOFSOIL said:

I dont go with it or against it, but i do know that aluminium and jet fuel alone could not turn the twin towers to dust before they hit the ground

They didn't turn to dust though did they.

[SONOFSOIL 215]

What was the stuff that covered the city, not much concrete and steel stayed together, got to be other energy involved, just my opinion, not trying to change anyone's mind, think for yourself

Edited March 26, 2021 by SONOFSOIL

[South hams hunter 8,921]

8 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

Some folk clearly have a hologram for a brain.

 

It's just what happens when old people get on the net mate, my nans like it with fb. They believe everything they read

[mushroom 12,883]

12 minutes ago, Daniel cain said:

Listening to the jokers...I need a biffta myself

Thinner papers fgs... that'll be like smoking the Telegraph

I remember reading an article/engineering report which said, the reason the steel structure failed in the twin towers (no idea about the other building) was due to the fire retardant foam not being applied properly and not giving full coverage to the superstructure. The foam is supposed to protect for X amount of time, up to something like 1800°C. Steel is pretty much useless as a load bearing structure at 1100+°C. Not sure what jet fuel burns at but I know its fuucking hot. Basically it failed and pancaked down, domino effect.

Whether I believe that was all that was involved, not sure. It does make sense from an engineering standpoint though. Especially if other factors are in play.

[stop.end 4,079]

Just now, mushroom said:

Thinner papers fgs... that'll be like smoking the Telegraph

I remember reading an article/engineering report which said, the reason the steel structure failed in the twin towers (no idea about the other building) was due to the fire retardant foam not being applied properly and not giving full coverage to the superstructure. The foam is supposed to protect for X amount of time, up to something like 1800°C. Steel is pretty much useless as a load bearing structure at 1100+°C. Not sure what jet fuel burns at but I know its fuucking hot. Basically it failed and pancaked down, domino effect.

Whether I believe that was all that was involved, not sure. It does make sense from an engineering standpoint though. Especially if other factors are in play.

Lol.. Thermite suppose didn't play a part in it either 

[Greb147 6,809]

3 minutes ago, W. Katchum said:

Might be completely no the same thing but didn’t that ole Fred used to drop them big brick chimneys with a wee fire an a few well placed hammer blows

No, that wasn't true either, just an actor and a big film set. 

[Greb147 6,809]

6 minutes ago, stop.end said:

Lol.. Thermite suppose didn't play a part in it either 

The building was termite free.... 

[SONOFSOIL 215]

8 minutes ago, W. Katchum said:

Might be completely no the same thing but didn’t that ole Fred used to drop them big brick chimneys with a wee fire an a few well placed hammer blows

Exactly fella, same well placed hammer blows that dropped the towers almost at freefall speed into there own footprint, same principle different technology

[chartpolski 23,350]

What about all those passengers and crew on the planes that phoned their loved ones before the crash ?

Another hoax ?

Cheers.

[SONOFSOIL 215]

Just now, chartpolski said:

What about all those passengers and crew on the planes that phoned their loved ones before the crash ?

Another hoax ?

Cheers.

Who knows, no records of flight 11 or 77 on the day, this is fact.

[WILF 46,688]

If it looks like rag heads and smells like rag heads and talks like rag heads.......it’s rag heads !