wheaten x pups

[poxon 5,751]

4 minutes ago, Black neck said:

Long as they washed the hands be fine

Just remember mate hands,face, space
sounds legit enough don’t it 

[Black neck 16,048]

2 minutes ago, poxon said:

Just remember mate hands,face, space
sounds legit enough don’t it 

How could the dog of possibly pulled the deer y wearing a mask ociffer 

[king 11,980]

24 minutes ago, Black neck said:

Well it ain't legal 2 go have a nice cup o t wi ya granny atm ffs or even anyone elses

You haven't got to type like you talk black neck

I'm sure you are wild bill's love child..

[Black neck 16,048]

16 minutes ago, king said:

You haven't got to type like you talk black neck

I'm sure you are wild bill's love child..

I dunt talk like that butt isn't it see 

[SheepChaser 8,089]

Lads do genuinely use lurchers to track and find / hold shot and lost or wounded deer, all legal and above board. Just like there’s nowt wrong on a shooting estate with hunting a fox out of cover with two lurchers and running it to ground (having attempted to shoot but being unable to on safety grounds) and then dropping a terrier in on said fox. All legal and above board!

[king 11,980]

Well if the owner of the sire told jigsaw the dog had wheaton in it.

then surely it's not jigsaws fault for telling lads who bought the pups that the sire has wheaton blood..

 

 

[nothernlite 18,089]

1 minute ago, king said:

Well if the owner of the sire told jigsaw the dog had wheaton in it.

then surely it's not jigsaws fault for telling lads who bought the pups that the sire has wheaton blood..

 

 

Thought we forgot about that ffs 

[Black neck 16,048]

2 minutes ago, king said:

Well if the owner of the sire told jigsaw the dog had wheaton in it.

then surely it's not jigsaws fault for telling lads who bought the pups that the sire has wheaton blood..

 

 

I'd be over the moon that the ain't got wheaton in 

[king 11,980]

3 minutes ago, nothernlite said:

Thought we forgot about that ffs 

Ah right lets move on then..

[Greb147 6,809]

17 minutes ago, Black neck said:

I'd be over the moon that the ain't got wheaton in 

I was thinking the same. 

What difference does it make if it's got wheaten or bull blood in it, the sire is clearly heavy greyhound infused anyway. 

[Black neck 16,048]

2 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

I was thinking the same. 

What difference does it make if it's got wheaten or bull blood in it, the sire is clearly heavy greyhound infused anyway. 

Oh well there's a lot o difference from what I've seen but that means nothing in the grand scheme o things as its just 1 man's opinion 

U know

[Greb147 6,809]

2 minutes ago, Black neck said:

Oh well there's a lot o difference from what I've seen but that means nothing in the grand scheme o things as its just 1 man's opinion 

U know

One's hairier than the other I suppose but if the sire was a capable foxing dog then wheaten or bull, it don't matter.

[Black neck 16,048]

3 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

One's hairier than the other I suppose but if the sire was a capable foxing dog then wheaten or bull, it don't matter.

Indeed sir

[poxon 5,751]

3 hours ago, SheepChaser said:

Lads do genuinely use lurchers to track and find / hold shot and lost or wounded deer, all legal and above board. Just like there’s nowt wrong on a shooting estate with hunting a fox out of cover with two lurchers and running it to ground (having attempted to shoot but being unable to on safety grounds) and then dropping a terrier in on said fox. All legal and above board!

They do that’s correct But not in the pitch black of night they wouldn’t be shooting deer then be out with a lurcher an lamp looking for it not very convincing story when a picture shows deer with its throat cut a dog with blood all over its chops an the deer looks like it’d been ass ended stating shot an retrieved gotta be the dumbest fecker out there to believe that it’s a ego boost status because any respecting shooting man or Lurcher man wouldn’t have a need for the pat on the back. Not upto date on terrier law but as I understand it even with that you can’t legally be using a dog to kill it’s only to bolt to awaiting guns or nets with a dispatch pistol if a Lurchers /hound as put the fox to ground ain’t it?

[SheepChaser 8,089]

3 minutes ago, poxon said:

They do that’s correct But not in the pitch black of night they wouldn’t be shooting deer then be out with a lurcher an lamp looking for it not very convincing story when a picture shows deer with its throat cut a dog with blood all over its chops an the deer looks like it’d been ass ended stating shot an retrieved gotta be the dumbest fecker out there to believe that it’s a ego boost status because any respecting shooting man or Lurcher man wouldn’t have a need for the pat on the back. Not upto date on terrier law but as I understand it even with that you can’t legally be using a dog to kill it’s only to bolt to awaiting guns or nets with a dispatch pistol if a Lurchers /hound as put the fox to ground ain’t it?

Agreed. Totally. 
 

On the terriers as far as I understand you can put a dog to ground to bolt a fox in protection of game birds and if the dog gets stuck you can dig it out and remove the dog and whilst there if you see the quarry you can dispatch it with an appropriate fire arm. You are allowed to use a lurcher to flush, to mark to ground and to either retrieve the dead quarry when shot or track and dispatch the quarry if a poor shot is made.