South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 7 minutes ago, maxhardcore said: Iv been thru this At the time thru the initial gov directive we thought it was cosher Thus found out thru family they were all end of life bar one who was genuine Covid but immune compromised Then what about you having the exact same story as that pic I just put up 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NEWKID 27,205 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) Stats from Brazil, Make different reading regards cases to deaths. Huge amount of confirmed cases 4.75m But only.. 142k deaths Why such a percentage difference from Brazil to Mexico? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/brazil/&ved=2ahUKEwjgnYzB7o3sAhXOSxUIHcDhBLoQFjAEegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2JvdBn-PU0QK8FCn7X9DU2 When I say only 142k deaths, I mean in comparison, around 7% less death rate to infection from Mexico..still a huge number of deaths... I think the world death figure is around 1m now... This is some mighty conspiracy that's for sure... Edited September 29, 2020 by NEWKID Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NEWKID 27,205 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 Anyhow... got to risk my life and drive to Paignton...the original Devon epicenter....lol Hopefully catch you all later... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Greb147 6,809 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 9 minutes ago, NEWKID said: Stats from Brazil, Make different reading regards cases to deaths. Huge amount of confirmed cases 4.75m But only.. 142k deaths Why such a percentage difference from Brazil to Mexico? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/brazil/&ved=2ahUKEwjgnYzB7o3sAhXOSxUIHcDhBLoQFjAEegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2JvdBn-PU0QK8FCn7X9DU2 When I say only 142k deaths, I mean in comparison, around 7% less death rate to infection from Mexico..still a huge number of deaths... I think the world death figure is around 1m now... This is some mighty conspiracy that's for sure... The deaths per 1 million population is actually very similar to Mexico. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sandymere 8,263 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 24 minutes ago, TOMO said: thank fook I'm all muscle then You went ahead with that whole body transplant then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackmag 6,101 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 1 hour ago, maxhardcore said: Oh ffs I don't don't u get it ? even at 42k it's killing no one under 45 years old . If we had the real kill figure it would be even less . And less again re percentages in the grand scheme of things as lots more have actually had it than the figures suggest I will ask for the fourth time were is your proof verified facts I'm talking about and for you to question born Hunter and doctors what are your qualifications in there field down go round the houses stick it up Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,776 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) 21 minutes ago, NEWKID said: Stats from Brazil, Make different reading regards cases to deaths. Huge amount of confirmed cases 4.75m But only.. 142k deaths Why such a percentage difference from Brazil to Mexico? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/brazil/&ved=2ahUKEwjgnYzB7o3sAhXOSxUIHcDhBLoQFjAEegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2JvdBn-PU0QK8FCn7X9DU2 When I say only 142k deaths, I mean in comparison, around 7% less death rate to infection from Mexico..still a huge number of deaths... I think the world death figure is around 1m now... This is some mighty conspiracy that's for sure... Their testing systems and infrastructure probably. How representative those 'case' numbers are depends on what that countries approach is to testing. The viral tests are useful for track and trace and determining if it was a factor in a death but the whole viral testing system has a lot of errors that need to be corrected for if you want to use it to accurately measure the true number of infections across the population. Large scale randomised antibody testing seems to be the best way to assess true infection rates, i.e. how many people have been infected (note: not currently infected). I'm not sure developing countries like Mexico and Brazil have the ability to easily do that, like UK, USA, EU do and likely have varying ability with the viral testing. Edited September 29, 2020 by Born Hunter 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Greb147 6,809 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 7 minutes ago, maxhardcore said: We talking Covid trials Dogfox So who's kids are having to take a trialed vaccine? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackmag 6,101 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, maxhardcore said: BAABAABlackmag have you any nouse Only in max world can you argue about something you have no verified facts on or any qualifications in that field Edited September 29, 2020 by Blackmag Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,776 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 12 minutes ago, Greb147 said: The deaths per 1 million population is actually very similar to Mexico. 3% to 10% is ballpark yeah. It could be caused by demographics, ie one country has a aged population or a severe respiratory health issue etc but I reckon it probably more likely testing. Those case numbers just aren't representative of true infection rates. Fortunately in the UK we have the antibody studies, so we know with a reasonable level of certainty that 6% of the population has had CV-19. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sandymere 8,263 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 Seems to be a lot of its "only killing compromised people" type statements, is it OK for them to die? Pretty much everyone over 60 is compromised to a degree and certainly those over 70. If you're being treated for cancer with an expectation to make a recovery and live another 10 or 20 years but die as your compromised at that point in your life is that OK? Perhaps you have a history of smoking and some chronic lung problems but have a life expectancy of another 15 years but get covid and die why is that different from anyone else? 5 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,776 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, sandymere said: Seems to be a lot of its "only killing compromised people" type statements, is it OK for them to die? Pretty much everyone over 60 is compromised to a degree and certainly those over 70. If you're being treated for cancer with an expectation to make a recovery and live another 10 or 20 years but die as your compromised at that point in your life is that OK? Perhaps you have a history of smoking and some chronic lung problems but have a life expectancy of another 15 years but get covid and die why is that different from anyone else? Personally, I don't count all deaths as equal. Age and quality are significant factors whether it's consider a pleasant discussion or not. E.g. A 70 year old dying in their sleep from a sudden condition is not as bad as an 8 year old being murdered. No death is strictly acceptable but we can't pretend that all deaths are equal. The fact is that the deaths attributed to this disease are weighted towards those with an already somewhat reduced life expectancy. It's a dirty discussion and folks are throwing it around like those who have died were worthless, which is wrong, but it's nonetheless true that it's better for someone who has lived most of their life to kick it than someone who has only just started theirs. IMO Says the fit and perfectly healthy 32 yr old....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,776 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 OMG I've just realised that COVID is a Labour plot to win the next election by killing off the Tory vote base! Fortunately as a Tory rich elite I'm immune from the laws that the plebs are subject to..... Now take my vaccine, plebs. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 7 hours ago, ChrisJones said: How many of those 65000 died of flu after receiving a vaccine? I wasn't aware that any vaccine was compulsory, and I'd like to know how many people opted for the vaccine in the year your figure came from and what the likely death toll was if there was no vaccine available. Lets have some statistics!! How's Chris? I don't know the answer to your question Chris, can you not tell us? That's not what my question was tho, what I'm asking is, can vaccinated people still be contagious an spread diceases Chris? An the answer I found was yes bud? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 @maxhardcore why is this the same as your story? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.