ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Francie said: How do you work that out Chris, are you saying white man evolved from a black man If I explained it you wouldn't believe it. So what's the point? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,019 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 I’m a direct descendant of genghis Khan wilf is more like Amur Khan 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,174 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 1 minute ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: I’m a direct descendant of genghis Khan wilf is more like Amur Khan Must be related to amir khanvas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,144 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: I’m a direct descendant of genghis Khan wilf is more like Amur Khan And Max now wants to be known as Afri Khan. 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,019 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 Here max , some tidy threads for you getting advertised you can cut round Hartlepool looking like a cross between Niall Quinn and nelson Mandela 1 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,087 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: I’m a direct descendant of genghis Khan wilf is more like Amur Khan The detailed break down of my DNA was 25% Ninja, 25% George Clooney and 50% Chuck Norris you f***ing non believer ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,087 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, gnasher16 said: And Max now wants to be known as Afri Khan. That genuinely made me burst out laughing ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,922 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 f**k me, you pair wanna get a room Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 7 minutes ago, WILF said: That genuinely made me burst out laughing ! Same. I'm still mopping up the coffee... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 11 hours ago, ChrisJones said: If I explained it you wouldn't believe it. So what's the point? Go ahead Chris, I'm listening mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,144 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 58 minutes ago, Francie said: Go ahead Chris, I'm listening mate Me too crack on Chris........not that i have any dog in this fight its just interesting shit to listen to. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,236 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 18 hours ago, gnasher16 said: Its only not right because its infantile as is any kind of name calling .... a black person would have to be pretty weak minded to actually feel hurt and victimised by it people get called names all the time why do blacks find it so atrociously terrifying. I dowt they do find name calling any more terrifying than we do.....you yourself in a later post on this thread say you don't use the nigger word out of respect to your black mates... using the chimp in the pic is the same as nigger or throwing a banana.....the three things are linked and go back to repression etc..... now that's where this thread kind of got going from....a grown man referring a new born baby from mixed parrants as a chimp...... now danny baker proberbly aint really some closet racist.....hes fecking half wit...but I dowt deep down that hes any kind of raging racist........however he didn't put that pic up with either of kate and Williams kids when they were born...... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,236 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 ps yeh chris I'm with gnash and francie....genuinely intrested Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 (edited) If you draw your family tree you have two parents. Four grandparents. Eight great-grandparents. Sixteen great-great-grandparents, and so on. If you keep doing that for about 40 generations you end up with a number around a trillion which is more than two thousand times the amount of people that have ever existed on earth at that time. Gentlemen, that is a paradox and we can only null it by understanding that our ancestors are not independent of each other. If it were possible to accurately trace their ancestry back, and their ancestors, and so on we'd loop back to a common ancestor and while this sounds confusing we're talking like a 25th cousin as opposed to an extremely close relative. You have to look at the family tree as more of a web than a tree. When the study was done, and I haven't read anything recently to contradict it, the problem was approached more mathematically than genetically and by crunching these numbers you eventually loop back round to a single common ancestor of every living person today. This doesn't mean that a single mythical creature suddenly started the European population it means that as you move further back through the passages of time the lines of genealogy cross at a single person. If you take all of us here on THL we will all have a common ancestor in our family tree going back around 600 years. Francie and I will have one but it might not be the same common ancestor as WILF and I, or Gnash and I, or Tomo and I but there will be one. The further back we go the more names will appear until we reach a single character. The good news to this is that everyone reading this is a descendant of Charlemagne and English aristocracy in general. You are royalty but we're all special so it means no one is. The bad news is that we're all descendants of the prophet Mohammed through the Zaida of Seville. Queen Elizabeth is his 43rd generational grandaughter with his blood being passed through Edward IV in the 15th century. Reading back through some of the comments on here that'll get a lot of resistance but as above it's irrelevant whether you believe it or not it's just how it is. The whole argument of race and bloodline is kinda nulled as there is no pure-blood anything based on the sheer volume of homo-sapiens alive on the planet and race is simply down to the level of melanin in the skin. It's nothing more than an evolved biological defence mechanism against UV rays. Yet we'll argue like children over it. Oh well... If it makes you feel better! Edited May 12, 2019 by ChrisJones Typo 5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fireman 10,919 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 10 minutes ago, ChrisJones said: If you draw your family tree you have two parents. Four grandparents. Eight great-grandparents. Sixteen great-great-grandparents, and so on. If you keep doing that for about 40 generations you end up with a number around a trillion which is more than two thousands the amount of people that have ever existed on earth at that time. Gentlemen, that is a paradox and we can only null it by understanding that our ancestors are not independent of each other. If it were possible to accurately trace their ancestry back, and their ancestors, and so on we'd loop back to a common ancestor and while this sounds confusing we're talking like a 25th cousin as opposed to an extremely close relative. You have to look at the family tree as more of a web than a tree. When the study was done, and I haven't read anything recently to contradict it, the problem was approached more mathematically than genetically and by crunching these numbers you eventually loop back round to a single common ancestor of every living person today. This doesn't mean that a single mythical creature suddenly started the European population it means that as you move further back through the passages of time the lines of genealogy cross at a single person. If you take all of us here on THL we will all have a common ancestor in our family tree going back around 600 years. Francie and I will have one but it might not be the same common ancestor as WILF and I, or Gnash and I, or Tomo and I but there will be one. The further back we go the more names will appear until we reach a single character. The good news to this is that everyone reading this is a descendant of Charlemagne and English aristocracy in general. You are royalty but we're all special so it means no one is. The bad news is that we're all descendants of the prophet Mohammed through the Zaida of Seville. Queen Elizabeth is his 43rd generational grandaughter with his blood being passed through Edward IV in the 15th century. Reading back through some of the comments on here that'll get a lot of resistance but as above it's irrelevant whether you believe it or not it's just how it is. The whole argument of race and bloodline is kinda nulled as there is no pure-blood anything based on the sheer volume of homo-sapiens alive on the planet and race is simply down to the level of melanin in the skin. It's nothing more than an evolved biological defence mechanism against UV rays. Yet we'll argue like children over it. Oh well... If it makes you feel better! All well and good but where does that Adam fella and that Eve lass fit in?... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.