ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 9, 2019 Report Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 5 hours ago, walshie said: Well last time i tried a Sig P320 in 9mm and this time a Glock 23 and a Wilson combat 1911. I've read the Wilsons are all pretty much custom guns so another one might be quite different to the one I tried. As all 3 were different calibres, it's hard to call a favourite, but I think the Sig just edges it. Especially now they have fixed them so they don't go off if you drop them. Glocks are a decent nice handling gun but 1911s are just too big. Fave manufactuers: Sig, Glock, Wilson. Fave Cals: 40, 9mm, 45. The only Sig I've shot with any regularity is the P229 which I really liked and will probably own one day! Nice to hear they've been working on the QC. I've always love the utilitarian appeal of Glock but if I had the money I'd pick up an H&K MK23 in .45 then I'd supress it. They're just a lot of fun to shoot. If you make it out this way we'll see if we can get you a few hundred rounds through an AR! Edited May 9, 2019 by ChrisJones 1 Quote Link to post
Alsone 789 Posted May 9, 2019 Report Share Posted May 9, 2019 Pity you're back now. I'd have said try 10mm if you got chance. More power than a .45 but less power and considerably less recoil than a .44 magnum. Kind of a 9mm on steroids. The FBI issued 10mm as a replacement for 9mm, but withdrew it, as some of the more slightly built male and some female agents allegedly couldn't handle the extra recoil / power and therefore it affected accuracy. However, from what I've seen, it only recoils a bit more for significantly more stopping power than 9mm. Very good calibre. The ultimate handgun calibre now in my opinion (purely from videos / reading as we don't have access to handguns over here) is probably 7.5FK. That said, with guns costing £7.5K (!!!) (BRNO) the opportunities of shooting one even in the states, is probably few and far between. 7.5FK combines similar if not more destructive power to a .44 mag in a gun with only a bit more recoil than a 9mm, maybe more around the 10mm mark. It's got the penetration of a rifle against body armour / bullet proof glass (it goes through most soft body armour with devastating expansion results after the armour and even 2 inches of bullet proof glass!). All in, got to be an interesting shoot and a very unusual round (it's allegedly been custom developed as a new sidearm for an unspecified NATO army by all accounts). Take a look at this shot if nothing else at 17 mins 44 secs, through to the results at 18 mins 40 secs. Mind blowing damage after going through Level IIIA armour. I doubt .44 mag without the body armour in between would beat that, in fact .44 mag wouldn't go through Level IIIA as Level IIIA defeats .44 mag!: Quote Link to post
walshie 2,804 Posted May 9, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2019 25 minutes ago, Alsone said: Pity you're back now. I'd have said try 10mm if you got chance. More power than a .45 but less power and considerably less recoil than a .44 magnum. Kind of a 9mm on steroids. The FBI issued 10mm as a replacement for 9mm, but withdrew it, as some of the more slightly built male and some female agents allegedly couldn't handle the extra recoil / power and therefore it affected accuracy. However, from what I've seen, it only recoils a bit more for significantly more stopping power than 9mm. Very good calibre. The ultimate handgun calibre now in my opinion (purely from videos / reading as we don't have access to handguns over here) is probably 7.5FK. That said, with guns costing £7.5K (!!!) (BRNO) the opportunities of shooting one even in the states, is probably few and far between. 7.5FK combines similar if not more destructive power to a .44 mag in a gun with only a bit more recoil than a 9mm, maybe more around the 10mm mark. It's got the penetration of a rifle against body armour / bullet proof glass (it goes through most soft body armour with devastating expansion results after the armour and even 2 inches of bullet proof glass!). All in, got to be an interesting shoot and a very unusual round (it's allegedly been custom developed as a new sidearm for an unspecified NATO army by all accounts). Take a look at this shot if nothing else at 17 mins 44 secs, through to the results at 18 mins 40 secs. Mind blowing damage after going through Level IIIA armour. I doubt .44 mag without the body armour in between would beat that, in fact .44 mag wouldn't go through Level IIIA as Level IIIA defeats .44 mag!: No, I definitely wanted to shoot a 40 and 45. Quote Link to post
Alsone 789 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 OK. Pity you couldn't try some others as well. Quote Link to post
walshie 2,804 Posted May 11, 2019 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Alsone said: OK. Pity you couldn't try some others as well. There's only so many hours in a day and only so many dollars in my pocket. Quote Link to post
Sausagedog 7,381 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 4 hours ago, walshie said: There's only so many hours in a day and only so many dollars in my pocket. And the Mrs usually sorts the rest of the hours and cash....well, mine does anyway 3 Quote Link to post
Alsone 789 Posted May 11, 2019 Report Share Posted May 11, 2019 12 hours ago, walshie said: There's only so many hours in a day and only so many dollars in my pocket. That's fair enough. Hope you enjoyed the hours you did have with the .40 / .45. 1 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.