Brexit

[liP 700]

38 minutes ago, Arry said:

Tusk the cheeky b*****d says he wants Jeremy Corbyn's deal staying in the customs union. Staying in the EU with out any say.

Cheers Arry

Exactly why we should be doing the exact opposite

[sandymere 8,263]

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-leave-brexiteers-bank-of-england-project-hysteria-jacob-rees-mogg-david-davis-a8659581.html

Theresa May made another mistake at the summit in Brussels last week. She could have enhanced her status by arriving in the hall declaring: “As there’s sod-all chance of getting this agreement past my own parliament, it’s a waste of time us being here. So I bought a van-load of tequila and we have to sink the lot. You start, Macron.”

Then she could have come out of the press conference clinging to the prime minister of Spain, both shouting: “I never liked Gibraltar anyway, have it, go on, have it”, while Michel Barnier sat on a stool crying, consoled by the president of Lithuania telling him, “don’t take any notice of Jean-Claude Juncker, you’re really pretty.”

Because the smart way to deal with Brexit, is join in with the irrationality. Whenever someone tries to make sense of it, that’s when they get in a tangle. So the head of the Bank of England spends weeks producing a series of reports on the possible economic outcomes, which must have been exhausting. But all that work was immediately dismissed by Jacob Rees-Mogg, who called the man who produced the report “a second-tier politician who failed in Canada, not greatly respected”.

This is much more fun, and takes a fraction of the effort. And he has a point, because the head of the Bank of England doesn’t have anywhere near the respect of supporters of a no-deal Brexit, like internationally renowned Boris Johnson, revered philosopher Nigel Farage and the lovable and quirky economics expert Tommy Robinson, whose paper on EU finance, “How much we coughing up? You’re having a laugh you oily foreign twat”, remains a classic after all these years.

Rees-Mogg himself has written a highly respected pamphlet, in which he states: “Should circumstances genuflect in such fashion as to cause temporary financial difficulty, the country would simply be required to behave as ever in times of monetary hardship – we should have to inherit something; a turret perhaps, or a lawn. Failing that, we could sell an antique chaise longue, or sack a nanny.”

All the most reliable predictions have come from supporters of the Leave campaign. For example, Liam Fox told us in advance the Brexit negotiations would be “the easiest deal in history”, and he must feel smug at how accurate he was.

While David Davis said, “within minutes of a vote for Brexit, CEOs would be knocking down Chancellor Merkel’s door, demanding access to the British market,” because then apparently, the EU would back down, desperate for us to buy their cars and wine.

Cabinet ministers resign over Brexit deal

 

It’s no wonder Davis is so keen on writing off the Bank of England’s silly predictions, when his one turned out exactly as he said. Any day soon the EU will back down, because the Italians are whispering to the Germans, “we’ll have to do as they ask with this backstop thing, we’ve got 20 bottles of Prosecco in the office and we can’t get rid of it.”

Brexit supporters should have made this argument more strongly, adding: “there’s no way the EU will ask us to pay extra duties after we’ve left, as there’s a bloke in Sweden trying to sell his old fridge. And we won’t buy it if Europe mucks us about.”

It is possible the Bank of England’s figures are wrong, which must be why Brexit enthusiasts haven’t made the mistake of producing their own documents, or research, or numbers. Instead they make the more persuasive argument – “don’t take notice of him, he’s discredited in Canada”.

This will soon become the way to succeed as an academic. To get top marks for a history degree, you’ll have to research first-hand accounts of the American War of Independence, then write “but they don’t know nothing, trying to be fancy with their quotes and graphs. The British won, and anyone who disagrees is talking Britain down, the traitors. Anyway, George Washington’s hated in Canada”.

Sports pundits will change in the same way. Gary Lineker will say he thinks Barcelona will win, because of their pace and ability and formation, and Davis will say “don’t take notice of that, it’s all very well having ‘knowledge’, but I know Bristol City will take them apart, because of this and that, and they’re nearer the sea, and no one has a good word to say about you in Toronto.”

 

The one argument put forward to suggest there will be a financial gain from leaving the EU, is that “deregulation – of the banks – will boost the economy by 0.1 per cent”. This makes you wonder why no one has thought of it before. If only we scrapped all the rules on banking, so bankers could make themselves as rich as possible, maybe making it amazingly easy to get a mortgage even if you had no chance of paying it back. We could make everything work perfectly.

Even if this has been done somewhere before, and someone revealed that it ended quite badly, with banks collapsing, there’s no need to take any notice of the evidence, because there’s nothing as misleading as facts.

Maybe the most helpful part of all these reports and predictions is where it’s stated the reduction in immigration that will follow Brexit will make the country worse off. That’s to say, worse, as in: not as good. This whole argument about immigration, in which politicians on both sides of the EU debate screamed we had to reduce it to make us better off, was upside-down.

So it’s touching to be able to find something on which many Remain politicians and Brexiteers alike can agree. In ignoring all the facts and screaming nonsense together, they’ve created a rare and charming moment of unity for us all.

 

 

Edited February 7, 2019 by sandymere

[Lenmcharristar 9,814]

5 hours ago, Francie said:

Im going to have to disagree with you there mate, under that fruitcakes rule, abortion upto 9 months is totally legal in ireland, yes 9 months.

Didnt know it meself, thought it was upto 3 months for some harsh reasons, but 9 f***ing months, hes a total an utter stain on ireland.

He’s like the stains he leaves on his rent boys gunks. But sure francie with some it doesn’t matter as long as they’re getting one over the uk. Morals are gone. And I’d put money on it varadker would be consenting to lower the age of homosexuality. All he needs is an injection of lead to the head

[green lurchers 16,714]

2 hours ago, Arry said:

Tusk the cheeky b*****d says he wants Jeremy Corbyn's deal staying in the customs union. Staying in the EU with out any say.

Cheers Arry

Tusk needs serious bell end might make him see things a bit clearer  he’s hanging out for it the bitch lol 

Edited February 7, 2019 by green lurchers

[Arry 21,977]

26 minutes ago, green lurchers said:

Tusk needs serious bell end might make him see things a bit clearer  he’s hanging out for it the bitch lol 

More like Jeremy Corbyns Bitch Lol.

Cheers Arry

[green lurchers 16,714]

2 hours ago, sandymere said:

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-leave-brexiteers-bank-of-england-project-hysteria-jacob-rees-mogg-david-davis-a8659581.html

Theresa May made another mistake at the summit in Brussels last week. She could have enhanced her status by arriving in the hall declaring: “As there’s sod-all chance of getting this agreement past my own parliament, it’s a waste of time us being here. So I bought a van-load of tequila and we have to sink the lot. You start, Macron.”

Then she could have come out of the press conference clinging to the prime minister of Spain, both shouting: “I never liked Gibraltar anyway, have it, go on, have it”, while Michel Barnier sat on a stool crying, consoled by the president of Lithuania telling him, “don’t take any notice of Jean-Claude Juncker, you’re really pretty.”

Because the smart way to deal with Brexit, is join in with the irrationality. Whenever someone tries to make sense of it, that’s when they get in a tangle. So the head of the Bank of England spends weeks producing a series of reports on the possible economic outcomes, which must have been exhausting. But all that work was immediately dismissed by Jacob Rees-Mogg, who called the man who produced the report “a second-tier politician who failed in Canada, not greatly respected”.

This is much more fun, and takes a fraction of the effort. And he has a point, because the head of the Bank of England doesn’t have anywhere near the respect of supporters of a no-deal Brexit, like internationally renowned Boris Johnson, revered philosopher Nigel Farage and the lovable and quirky economics expert Tommy Robinson, whose paper on EU finance, “How much we coughing up? You’re having a laugh you oily foreign twat”, remains a classic after all these years.

Rees-Mogg himself has written a highly respected pamphlet, in which he states: “Should circumstances genuflect in such fashion as to cause temporary financial difficulty, the country would simply be required to behave as ever in times of monetary hardship – we should have to inherit something; a turret perhaps, or a lawn. Failing that, we could sell an antique chaise longue, or sack a nanny.”

All the most reliable predictions have come from supporters of the Leave campaign. For example, Liam Fox told us in advance the Brexit negotiations would be “the easiest deal in history”, and he must feel smug at how accurate he was.

While David Davis said, “within minutes of a vote for Brexit, CEOs would be knocking down Chancellor Merkel’s door, demanding access to the British market,” because then apparently, the EU would back down, desperate for us to buy their cars and wine.

Cabinet ministers resign over Brexit deal

 

It’s no wonder Davis is so keen on writing off the Bank of England’s silly predictions, when his one turned out exactly as he said. Any day soon the EU will back down, because the Italians are whispering to the Germans, “we’ll have to do as they ask with this backstop thing, we’ve got 20 bottles of Prosecco in the office and we can’t get rid of it.”

Brexit supporters should have made this argument more strongly, adding: “there’s no way the EU will ask us to pay extra duties after we’ve left, as there’s a bloke in Sweden trying to sell his old fridge. And we won’t buy it if Europe mucks us about.”

It is possible the Bank of England’s figures are wrong, which must be why Brexit enthusiasts haven’t made the mistake of producing their own documents, or research, or numbers. Instead they make the more persuasive argument – “don’t take notice of him, he’s discredited in Canada”.

This will soon become the way to succeed as an academic. To get top marks for a history degree, you’ll have to research first-hand accounts of the American War of Independence, then write “but they don’t know nothing, trying to be fancy with their quotes and graphs. The British won, and anyone who disagrees is talking Britain down, the traitors. Anyway, George Washington’s hated in Canada”.

Sports pundits will change in the same way. Gary Lineker will say he thinks Barcelona will win, because of their pace and ability and formation, and Davis will say “don’t take notice of that, it’s all very well having ‘knowledge’, but I know Bristol City will take them apart, because of this and that, and they’re nearer the sea, and no one has a good word to say about you in Toronto.”

 

The one argument put forward to suggest there will be a financial gain from leaving the EU, is that “deregulation – of the banks – will boost the economy by 0.1 per cent”. This makes you wonder why no one has thought of it before. If only we scrapped all the rules on banking, so bankers could make themselves as rich as possible, maybe making it amazingly easy to get a mortgage even if you had no chance of paying it back. We could make everything work perfectly.

Even if this has been done somewhere before, and someone revealed that it ended quite badly, with banks collapsing, there’s no need to take any notice of the evidence, because there’s nothing as misleading as facts.

Maybe the most helpful part of all these reports and predictions is where it’s stated the reduction in immigration that will follow Brexit will make the country worse off. That’s to say, worse, as in: not as good. This whole argument about immigration, in which politicians on both sides of the EU debate screamed we had to reduce it to make us better off, was upside-down.

So it’s touching to be able to find something on which many Remain politicians and Brexiteers alike can agree. In ignoring all the facts and screaming nonsense together, they’ve created a rare and charming moment of unity for us all.

 

 

And the previous Bank of England man  merv sort of sees things the opposite to Carney  who’s a Canadian cnt like ya man treacherous trudeu  it’s just the angle you see it from,  mogg the true Brit is there for the right reasons Blair I mean Corbyn is ther cos  he’s a proper cnt  , hang on tusk the self proclaimed hooligan  cnt wants May to take notice of Corbyn , a proper cnt tusk wants  May dopey cnt to go seek advice  from Corbyn who’s  a historical cnt for advice lol  I’m sorry but the eu have showed there hand and they are the real deal phoney  no good unelected cnts

Edited February 7, 2019 by green lurchers

[Arry 21,977]

EU crumbling Italy and France a bit pissed off with each other,

Cheers Arry

[kanny 20,626]

[bob.243 8,863]

[Born Hunter 17,775]

Quote

Britain’s departure from the European Union without a deal would doom the prospects for a Franco-German next-generation fighter jet with a rival project in Britain, the head of Airbus Defence and Space told the Handelsblatt German newspaper.

Dirk Hoke told the newspaper he considered it “absolutely imperative” that the EU reach an agreement with Britain on security, defence and space given the closely interwoven ties between Europe and Britain.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-airbus-brexit/hard-brexit-would-doom-future-merger-of-uk-franco-german-fighter-projects-airbus-defence-idUKKCN1Q20ID

 

Quote

Williamson warned of a “resurgent” Russia that is, alongside China, blurring “the boundaries between peace and war”. He said Brexit presents the “greatest opportunity in 50 years to redefine our role” and challenge those who “flout” the “rules-based international order”.

In light of Brexit, the UK must build on established relationships outside of Europe with the US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Williamson also highlighted Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, South Korea, India, Nigeria, and Kenya as nations with whom the UK must continue to work alongside.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/gavin-williamson-lays-out-defence-plans-for-a-global-britain/

 

Quote

The British designed Type 26 Global Combat Ship has been officially chosen as the design for the Canadian Surface Combatant despite a legal challenge from a rival bidder, with the contract having now been awarded.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/canadian-type-26-frigate-contract-awarded-after-legal-challenge-dismissed/

 

All brilliant positive news.

[sandymere 8,263]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/as-brexit-disaster-looms-we-must-have-the-courage-to-retrace-our-steps-a4063341.html%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwjQypuT5bjgAhWDs3EKHUffC_IQyM8BMAJ6BAgJEAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ML_AU7AHwFzxmrJWNdmpC&ampcf=1

 

[Arry 21,977]

Whats the point of the first vote if they what a second or shall we have the best of three or the best of five. The vote been done and there should be no talk of remain. The MP's are there to represent the people and democratically we vote out, now they get pay a good wage to up hold the will of the people. So why the feck after two years are they still talking about it for, because 80% of MP's don't want to leave. They are hell bent on doing any thing to trip leave up, stick every stick in the spokes of the wheel. If they had accepted the vote that they all should had done and worked hard and pulled together it would be all done and dusted by now.

They are all bloody traitors of the people IMO.

Cheers Arry

[dogmandont 9,840]

53 minutes ago, Arry said:

Whats the point of the first vote if they what a second or shall we have the best of three or the best of five. The vote been done and there should be no talk of remain. The MP's are there to represent the people and democratically we vote out, now they get pay a good wage to up hold the will of the people. So why the feck after two years are they still talking about it for, because 80% of MP's don't want to leave. They are hell bent on doing any thing to trip leave up, stick every stick in the spokes of the wheel. If they had accepted the vote that they all should had done and worked hard and pulled together it would be all done and dusted by now.

They are all bloody traitors of the people IMO.

Cheers Arry

They are traitors to slightly over half the population... which is why the problem exists. Democracy is an illusion always has been always will be.

Edited February 13, 2019 by dogmandont

[Arry 21,977]

Think I'll have to buy a yellow vest.

Cheers Arry

[dogmandont 9,840]

35 minutes ago, Bundy89 said:

I guarantee if we left with no deal and it went tits up they'd be labelled worse.

If the economic scare stories are true then you can guarantee it's the working class that will suffer.

While Mogg and boris sail off into the sunset not giving one continental fcuk about the man on the street.