ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, W. Katchum said: Shoulda just hung a big sign in window saying no fags,hags, sissy’s or gingers just to avoid confusion, think I’ll get one made up incase I ever decide to open a buissness I don't make cakes for a living so I've never really had an issue with cake related politics but a simple "Naah, I'm not doing that" should suffice. I shouldn't have to have a court mandated explanation as to why. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,813 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 listen fellas, this wasnt just a randomer who walked into a random bakery in belfast and got into a row, it was a set up by a poof and his poofter club supporters and the terminally offended who knew exactly the beliefs of the owners and the anti gay stance they held. these poofs and the rainbow waving club need booted out of northern ireland. im glad that common sense prevailed in the end. but its not going to stop the hunting for offence law cases that they seem to crave to be in as theyre using it as an agenda to turd push the law into changing to suit them in their perverse ways 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deker 3,478 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 I'd still have written whatever they wanted on the cake for the right money! The whole situation is totally insane! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
j j m 6,540 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 I think they should allow them fairy cakes,in pink 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bob.243 8,850 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 Well, now the turd stabbers will just have to :- 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 "The management reserve the right to refuse service, without explanation." Common sense has, for once, prevailed ! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 A thought has just occurred to me.......... I believe the cake was meant to have Bert and Ernie, from Sesame Street, on it. Couldn't the bakers have simply said "We can't make that cake. Those characters are copyrighted." ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deker 3,478 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 (edited) On 10/10/2018 at 19:58, Blackbriar said: A thought has just occurred to me.......... I believe the cake was meant to have Bert and Ernie, from Sesame Street, on it. Couldn't the bakers have simply said "We can't make that cake. Those characters are copyrighted." ? As several others have suggested, couldn't' they have just tried somewhere else, seems they were determined to be offended. There seems a whole section of society out there at the moment in all sorts of areas that simply go out to be shocked/offended/upset and try and make something out of nothing! Edited October 12, 2018 by Deker 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 The result is predictably political. They could've gone somewhere else. He should be allowed to decline service without any explanation whatsoever. Result is taxpayers money squandered while the courts are backed up with actual crimes rather than thought ones. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
steve66 3,470 Posted October 10, 2018 Report Share Posted October 10, 2018 All they wanted was a bit of broke back batten burg 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chid 6,542 Posted October 11, 2018 Report Share Posted October 11, 2018 I’m sure I heard on the radio the “gay rights activist” had been served before and after the cake row ... tell me why after taking someone to court would you go back and buy off them again unless it was to rub there noses in it and try get a reaction from ashers.. If I’d gone up the falls road and asked for a cake with a orange sash on it I’d be told to f**k off and probably not come out alive , so I’d say the gay rights activist got off lightly with just a refusal on the cake 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted October 11, 2018 Report Share Posted October 11, 2018 Good enough for the wee c**t, as len said, he knew whst he was doing, all orchestrated. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted October 12, 2018 Report Share Posted October 12, 2018 Were all sinners mate lol 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 They're being sued again... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
delswal 3,819 Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 So how is it a Pharmacist can refuse the morning after pill on moral grounds, which is legal for them to do so in this country, yet a shopkeeper cannot refuse a sale on their moral grounds? strange country we live in huh 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.