Forum lifespan

[South hams hunter 8,937]

18 minutes ago, timmytree said:

It might seem like fun but there is a serious side. All sorts of people monitor these forums, do gooders, antis, probably police. You never know who's reading and taking note. It only takes 1 person to make us all look bad.

Just like in the past I've argued about the GL when people post they shot woodies in the garden or off a bird table. It's wrong, better off keeping quiet rather than telling everyone you break the law. But these numpties want to be noticed don't they? Just ignore and don't rise to the bait.

 

If it's your garden it all gravy

[Welsh_red 4,779]

8 minutes ago, South hams hunter said:

If it's your garden it all gravy

Always thought their had to be a legitimate reason . Not sure if you lived in a city and they wanted to be jobswirth would have cut it.  Might be wrong tho

[Greyman 29,471]

You have to have exhausted all other methods of deterrent before letting the lead fly I believe

[Chaff 3,622]

Can't see what difference it makes I grow veg to feed my family not fat woodies.

Farm grows veg to sell as food same difference

As long as your safe back stop wise.

I know someone that let's go with a 410 in his garden.

 

[Jonjon79 13,358]

27 minutes ago, Welsh_red said:

Always thought their had to be a legitimate reason . Not sure if you lived in a city and they wanted to be jobswirth would have cut it.  Might be wrong tho

 

17 minutes ago, Greyman said:

You have to have exhausted all other methods of deterrent before letting the lead fly I believe

You're both right

 

You have to be able to show that their causing damage or, that they're a health hazard.

 

Then, you have to be able to show that you've tried all reasonable means to deter them.

 

Then you would be legally able to shoot them with an airgun.

 

But, as long as you're discrete, popping off a couple of woodies in the back garden for dinner is hardly on a par with the Brinks Matt Robbery.

You'd just need to go about it with out pissing the neighbours off or letting the whole neighbourhood know.

[Ptd87 304]

1 hour ago, W. Katchum said:

I stopped listening to his bullshite months ago, guy is delusional with no moral compass so jist waffles shite or a rise, don’t even ban him cos he will just come back under a new name thinking it’s the start a the game again, ignore the fcuker, he don’t like that

I've had plenty of pm off the moron ... Only thing that got rid (hope) is ignoring him... Comes out with some sick shit he does

[dave88 1,565]

Feeling a bit left out now, the c**ts never messaged me 

[Ptd87 304]

Needs getting rid of ... Not just on here either

[Ptd87 304]

1 minute ago, dave88 said:

Feeling a bit left out now, the c**ts never messaged me 

Your not missing much .... Either wants to shag your family or fight you... Fairly boring really 

[walshie 2,804]

3 hours ago, maxhardcore said:

Like I said before there was some good impartial moderating on here in the past .

Nowdays you can do and say as you please depending on how the mods view you ect

ie 'if your face fits and it's good for traffic ex 

No room on here for personal insults towards someone's kids ect .

Impartial moderating my arse. Must have been wonderful if there were mods about who could moderate 24/7 without needing to get on with their own lives. Use the report button instead of whinging when stuff doesn't get sorted the second you want it to.

He's gone now. But he'll be back under yet another username. 

[Jonjon79 13,358]

The only threatening PM I ever got on here was from Lurcherman 887 saying if I didn’t lick his balls whilst we had a felching session, he wouldn’t let me have a go with the butt plug which he uses on “special” occasions! 

 

[liP 700]

Just now, W. Katchum said:

Mods ain’t any better or worse than ever before, always been shite goin on in here

That fcuking Rat took some beating  

[peterhunter86 8,627]

3 minutes ago, Ptd87 said:

Your not missing much .... Either wants to shag your family or fight you... Fairly boring really 

The next time he gets a shag will be his first time,  

 

 

[Born Hunter 17,832]

Can I suggest that the mods are given the power to force members to be blocked to other members? Let's face it very few people have the maturity to not rise to provocation and probably feel a bit weak blocking someone. By mods activating a blocking between members that have beef it might go a little way to ending the childishness. By banning members they just come back and it starts again. Blocking might not do that.

Just a thought. It could be temporary or permanent.

[Born Hunter 17,832]

14 minutes ago, W. Katchum said:

Like swapping desks at school

Exactly! Standing against the wall clearly isn't working and writing lines isnt practical.