NITE STALKER Vs BLITZ

[gtomo 4]

Does anyone no if the NS has a tighter beam than the LF

yes it has

 

Thanks ripstop i like a tight beam i think am going to order a NS and give it ago if the only problem is the wire that can be changed

[wilba1985 0]

ive owned a light force and to be honest had nothing but trouble then after reading a post on this site went out and bought a night stalker which is a lot better lamp than the light force its built a lot stronger the wiring havnt gone yet so imo the night stalkers a better lamp for me

[Rabbithunter 456]

got a blitz, and my mate has N/S 180... its a good lamp, but doesnt have the range that i PERSONALLY would like. Blitz all the way for me, although i might get the N/S 220. and find out for myself

Edited December 29, 2007 by Rabbithunter

[suluki 2]

the LF has a much tighter beam there is no lip on the NS to titen the beam!!!!!!!!!! my mate has the NS and is going to get some 180mm pipe to go over the end to try and get it titer!!! we had them both out the other night and my LF had a titer and longer beam!!!!!!!!!

[ASME IX 1]

hi suluki

 

putting pipe over the end will only reduce the outer glare on the beam

 

regards asme9

[B moocher 0]

CHEERS EVERYONE THE POINT OF THE MATTER IS I HAVE A LF STRIKER BUT WANTED A BIGGER LAMP FOR THE BIGGER FIELDS OR AS WE ALL CALL IT HARE COUNTRY.SO THE MAJORITY OF YOU ALL THINK THE BLITZ RATHER THAN THE NS 220 ? THAT WILL MAKE IT EASIER ON MY POCKET AS I'LL JUST BUY THE BLITZ HOUSING FOR MY LAMP.

 

 

CHEERS EVERYONE AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU ALL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[bowers1986 3]

Ive heard the Blitz is a bit greedy on juice,,,and is quite chunky although Ive not seen the new night stalker in action

[maty j 6]

Ive heard the Blitz is a bit greedy on juice,,,and is quite chunky although Ive not seen the new night stalker in action

 

its the bulb you have in it that drains the battery not the lamp... my NS 180 came with a battery guzzling 100w one, i swapped it over for a 50w and its much better now and i cant notice a difference in the beam but the fields round here arnt exactly big either..

 

i thought this 180 was chunky so id imagine the 240 to be like a wok! god help ye when the wind gets up

[walksatnight 6]

ive just got a nite stalker and with the red filter it throws a far better beam than the light force imo

[B moocher 0]

sounds like mixed feelings ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????//

[sthelens hunter 73]

u cant beat the old coleman lamps

[stormrider8 59]

you aint wrong mate, cant get um anywhere!..

[Guest lurcherboy2008]

HAS ANYONE YET PURCHASED THE NEW NITE STALKER AND ARE THEY BETTER OR WORSE THAN THE BLITZ WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK ?????

 

i was out lampin last night with both nightstalker 220 and blitz with same battery packs. 1st off we used the nightstalker for 2 hours. got back to car then we brought the blitz out. soon as we shone the biltz it was a difference. blitz got further beam. ngihtstalker are built better. the lead is awsome on them and where they say they got silent switch, thas aload of bollux it makes roughlysame noise as blitz switch. anyway im buying the nightstalker next week. if u buy em from the countrymans weekly i think they £85 and ur from welsh valleys so if i was u id go to neath gunshop where they re £70. u wont b unhappy with it bu if ur on the massive fields blitz are the boys. nightstalker 220 is between stiker 170 and blitz 240 bit ther not much diff with the blitz beam

[Guest spud.]

think im going to try one ov the 220. iv had 3 lightforce 170s and a 170 dimmer in the last 2 year and they all fuckd. absoulote shit but a good beam tho. shit for the price you pay like.

[Guest markbrick1]

blitz any day,mark