ChrisJones 7,975 Posted April 10, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2018 (edited) Zuckerberg is giving evidence... https://www.politico.com/livestream Stream is done so some highlights Edited April 10, 2018 by ChrisJones Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ted Newgent 4,896 Posted April 11, 2018 Report Share Posted April 11, 2018 On 3/27/2018 at 12:56, mushroom said: I bet that cnut has a private backend directly to my WhatsApp account lol The videos these birds send me are outrageous ??? send them me 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 14, 2018 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2018 One of Britains most senior judges, Sir Geoffrey Vos predicts that Britain will soon introduce law that makes carrying a mobile phone compulsory in order to tackle crime. He's quoted in The Daily Fail saying that as Britons have now accepted constantly increasing levels of surveillance a mobile that is constantly switched on would be an asset in the fight against crime. In a lecture to the law society he said... Quote 'Most people carry their smartphones on their person at all times with their GPS location switched on. 'They do this voluntarily, but if the legislators were, for example, to require citizens to carry phones at all times, it would be even more difficult to avoid detection. ‘As society seems to accept more and more surveillance, I wonder how radical the change I have mentioned will seem to the population in ten, 15 or 20 years’ time.’ This seems a far more sensible approach than micro-chipping everyone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,751 Posted May 14, 2018 Report Share Posted May 14, 2018 11 minutes ago, ChrisJones said: One of Britains most senior judges, Sir Geoffrey Vos predicts that Britain will soon introduce law that makes carrying a mobile phone compulsory in order to tackle crime. He's quoted in The Daily Fail saying that as Britons have now accepted constantly increasing levels of surveillance a mobile that is constantly switched on would be an asset in the fight against crime. In a lecture to the law society he said... This seems a far more sensible approach than micro-chipping everyone. ... the f**k! "Quick get out of my way, I NEED TO LEAVE! MOVE!!!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,263 Posted May 14, 2018 Report Share Posted May 14, 2018 1 hour ago, ChrisJones said: This seems a far more sensible approach than micro-chipping everyone. I have said many times people would kick off at the idea of their kids or themselves being chipped,yet they are conned into buying the chips themselves in the form of smart-phones,who,why,when,where,your willingly carrying every single detail of your life in that small I-phone case,and it can only get worse,every single item of your data harvested already. 2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 14, 2018 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2018 Just now, mackem said: I have said many times people would kick off at the idea of their kids or themselves being chipped,yet they are conned into buying the chips themselves in the form of smart-phones,who,why,when,where,your willingly carrying every single detail of your life in that small I-phone case,and it can only get worse,every single item of your data harvested already. Agreed mate. It still baffles me that not only does it happen and in spite of multiple data breaches and crimes committed with people's info the standard response is along the lines of "I've Done Nothing Wrong So I Have Nothing To Worry About..." Even the judge in the article mentions how the sheep are now used to the surveillance. Total compliance. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 Police are using marketing g data to profile suspects ! https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/all-media/police-use-experian-marketing-data-for-ai-custody-decisions/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,684 Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 But Trump banged a porn star and then gave her a few quid!.......get your f***ing priorities right mate !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 1 hour ago, WILF said: But Trump banged a porn star and then gave her a few quid!.......get your f***ing priorities right mate !! Who, me ? I don't give flying f*** who Trump boned.........or didn't........allegedly. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,684 Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 1 hour ago, Blackbriar said: Who, me ? I don't give flying f*** who Trump boned.........or didn't........allegedly. No, but you are meant too my friend Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 54 minutes ago, WILF said: No, but you are meant too my friend C'mon mate. You wouldn't even be a little pissed if they'd used three times your annual salary, of your tax money, to shut her up? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,684 Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 7 hours ago, ChrisJones said: C'mon mate. You wouldn't even be a little pissed if they'd used three times your annual salary, of your tax money, to shut her up? Actually mate, no, I’d just think “oh yeah, totally standard” Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted May 19, 2018 Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 17 hours ago, ChrisJones said: C'mon mate. You wouldn't even be a little pissed if they'd used three times your annual salary, of your tax money, to shut her up? I'm much more concerned about things like this........... https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/all-campaigns/face-off-campaign/ While we're distracted by Trump's alleged dalliances and Royal weddings, the surveillance net grows ever tighter..........and nobody seems to care. The technology doesn't work terribly well just now, but that will change, and facial recognition cameras will allow "the authorities" to track our movements, in real time, without our knowledge. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted May 19, 2018 Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 We don't care cause there nothing we can do about it and technology will only get more advanced as the decades roll on. If you think we the people are going to stop it then you're wrong.. This generation and future generations don't give a f**k as long as they have Facebook and Britain's got talent and all that other garbage they will let it continue unchecked. I accepted it long time ago im just a dinosaur living out what time I have left in an era I have no understanding in and will be happy to see the back of it and leave it to the c**ts and there ultimate Demise. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted May 19, 2018 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 5 hours ago, Blackbriar said: I'm much more concerned about things like this........... https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/all-campaigns/face-off-campaign/ While we're distracted by Trump's alleged dalliances and Royal weddings, the surveillance net grows ever tighter..........and nobody seems to care. The technology doesn't work terribly well just now, but that will change, and facial recognition cameras will allow "the authorities" to track our movements, in real time, without our knowledge. 6 years in prison for criticising Islam. Nothing. A rich couple getting married on the taxpayer. 24-page thread. Senior judge is pushing for legislation to make it law to carry a mobile device with the GPS turned on for tracking purposes. Nothing. Leader of the free world might be using taxpayer money to pay off his mistress. *shrugs* 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.