Strange find

[dave88 1,565]

[CushtyJook 1,097]

11 hours ago, socks said:

Lots of people still believe it was the us government that did it .......

Maybe not us government but three towers don't fall in to there footprint like that not s chamc brain dead if you Belive the 911 official story 

[Dinosaurs 2,044]

Ted as an American whars your thoughts?? Atb

[Greyman 28,439]

Don't know or care much one way or another but interestingly, ground zero is the name given to the base of a nuclear explosion and the base of the twin towers, coincidence or just hiding the truth in plain site you decide 

[dave88 1,565]

22 minutes ago, Dinosaurs said:

Ted as an American whars your thoughts?? Atb

He's a pretend Canadian haha

[ginger beard 4,652]

And i suppose david cameron ordered the 7/7 bombing.

[Ted Newgent 4,896]

21 minutes ago, Dinosaurs said:

Ted as an American whars your thoughts?? Atb

i am english

why on earth did you think i was american

 

my money is on the government doing this

[ChrisJones 7,975]

We had fun with this one back in September, didn't we!

[Ted Newgent 4,896]

4 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

We had fun with this one back in September, didn't we!

Looks like i re lit the fire again

[Greyman 28,439]

31 minutes ago, ginger beard said:

And i suppose david cameron ordered the 7/7 bombing.

Well Churchill ordered the sinking of an American ship knowing that Germany would get blamed and the Americans would be encouraged to join us in ww2, so sometime fact is stranger than fiction, and though I don't think our government ordered 7/7 sometimes turning a blind eye and allowing an atrocity  to happen is just as effective as doing them yourself, ?????? But conspiracy theory's are just that,  theory's or alternative opinion,s of events and not facts or conclusive proof, so personally I like to keep an open mind until I see something that proves things one way or the other, makes life a bit more interesting than just believing everything your told 

[ginger beard 4,652]

22 minutes ago, Greyman said:

Well Churchill ordered the sinking of an American ship knowing that Germany would get blamed and the Americans would be encouraged to join us in ww2, so sometime fact is stranger than fiction, and though I don't think our government ordered 7/7 sometimes turning a blind eye and allowing an atrocity  to happen is just as effective as doing them yourself, ?????? But conspiracy theory's are just that,  theory's or alternative opinion,s of events and not facts or conclusive proof, so personally I like to keep an open mind until I see something that proves things one way or the other, makes life a bit more interesting than just believing everything your told 

Bollocks.Stay off the crack greyman.

[Dinosaurs 2,044]

1 hour ago, Ted Newgent said:

i am english

why on earth did you think i was american

 

my money is on the government doing this

?Sorry bud no offence intended just thought you were a septic ?...Atb

[Greyman 28,439]

28 minutes ago, ginger beard said:

Bollocks.Stay off the crack greyman.

Quote

Fantastic debating skills you have there mate, keep up the good work your country needs you 

 

[scothunter 12,609]

I assume you are referring to the Lusitania? Churchill did not order it's sinking! 

May not have gave it protection but even that wasn't deemed necessary. Maybe secretly was happy about it After the sinking but wasn't on his orders. 

There is also claims it was full of much needed arms for the British so sinking it was not in our interests.

Anyway the German U-boat commander who did sink it helped the survivors against the German fleets orders to not pick up survivors! In fact he risked being sunk himself by breaking radio silence telling the Brits where he cast them off. 

If you really want to point the finger at him.he can be blamed to a certain degree.for using a passenger ship to deliver weapons.as far as the Germans were considered it was a legitimate target. They warned America a good few times they would sink ships they knew were carrying contraband. Then I think the day before they said all ships were fair game. As Churchill was first lord of the admilarity he knew. 

Also it wasn't a yank ship it was British but mostly yank passengers.

[Greyman 28,439]

24 minutes ago, scothunter said:

I assume you are referring to the Lusitania? Churchill did not order it's sinking! 

May not have gave it protection but even that wasn't deemed necessary. Maybe secretly was happy about it After the sinking but wasn't on his orders. 

There is also claims it was full of much needed arms for the British so sinking it was not in our interests.

Anyway the German U-boat commander who did sink it helped the survivors against the German fleets orders to not pick up survivors! In fact he risked being sunk himself by breaking radio silence telling the Brits where he cast them off. 

If you really want to point the finger at him.he can be blamed to a certain degree.for using a passenger ship to deliver weapons.as far as the Germans were considered it was a legitimate target. They warned America a good few times they would sink ships they knew were carrying contraband. Then I think the day before they said all ships were fair game. As Churchill was first lord of the admilarity he knew. 

Also it wasn't a yank ship it was British but mostly yank passengers.

As I said I don't really care, but for every official version of events there is an alternative as you have just shown, it won't change my life regardless of who did it so I try not to get to concerned by it, it,s just a mildly interesting subject on a housebound day though not as interesting as the birds in the garden at the moment