ChrisJones 7,975 Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 A new look at an old find has revealed that humans bonded emotionally with their dogs much earlier than we thought. A PhD candidate and a vet, at Leiden University, have studied human and canine bones found from a grave discovered in 1914. Recent studies have shown the remains to be around 14,000 years old but the reveal that humans bonded with dogs was from the study of the dog's teeth. The degraded material from the teeth has shown that the dog suffered from a form of distemper and that it must have been contracted as a pup, yet the dog had lived until 7-8 months showing that despite the fact it couldn't function as a hunter they'd cared for it for a considerable length of time. Death from distemper is three weeks at the most, without adequate care. There was nothing listed in the study as to whether the dog or the people were black so I'm sure this thread won't go beyond a couple of posts. 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ginger beard 4,653 Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 How do they know.it's just some scientist with an agenda's opinion. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Astanley 11,588 Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 No evidence of being treated by a vet ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted February 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 12 minutes ago, ginger beard said: How do they know.it's just some scientist with an agenda's opinion. The same way they know you'd never get elected. Observable and testable data. 7 minutes ago, Astanley said: No evidence of being treated by a vet ? The bones are 14,000 years old. I'm not sure if they've analyzed the human remains to hypothesise the dead man's occupation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Astanley 11,588 Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 I watched the Flintstones ,they deffo had vets then . 1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted February 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 17 minutes ago, Astanley said: I watched the Flintstones ,they deffo had vets then . But no dogs which creates a Jurassic quandary. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ginger beard 4,653 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 Don't know f**k all about dinosaurs but i live near the jurassic coast and you can find fossils all the time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted February 12, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, ginger beard said: the jurassic coast Is that a euphemism for Eastbourne? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 48,101 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) Only the ones who cared for the dogs and who’s dogs lived were black, they did it while they carved Cellos from raw diamonds and composed classical chamber music or while painting a master piece or writing literature. All the white blokes were licking walls, not able to dance a step and their dogs died en masse !! Edited February 12, 2018 by WILF 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 11 hours ago, ChrisJones said: A new look at an old find has revealed that humans bonded emotionally with their dogs much earlier than we thought. A PhD candidate and a vet, at Leiden University, have studied human and canine bones found from a grave discovered in 1914. Recent studies have shown the remains to be around 14,000 years old but the reveal that humans bonded with dogs was from the study of the dog's teeth. The degraded material from the teeth has shown that the dog suffered from a form of distemper and that it must have been contracted as a pup, yet the dog had lived until 7-8 months showing that despite the fact it couldn't function as a hunter they'd cared for it for a considerable length of time. Death from distemper is three weeks at the most, without adequate care. There was nothing listed in the study as to whether the dog or the people were black so I'm sure this thread won't go beyond a couple of posts. Alot of must haves an assumptions in there chris, not alot of facts mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 So was it just the dogs teeth they found, nothing else mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hily 380 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 VETS BILL and signs that the bloke topped him self. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) So just for the craic chris, what do you expect dogs to evolve into? Will they stay the same, four legs, sharp teeth etc or will they evolve into different "species" and why mate? Another question, what did wolves evolve from?was it also a "prehistoric canine?lol Edited February 12, 2018 by Francie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jiggy 3,209 Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 Or else the owner was a cruel Cnut and filed down the dogs teeth when he was bored. I wouldn't be surprised if the next scientific fact states that earth is actually flat. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted February 12, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 5 hours ago, Francie said: Alot of must haves an assumptions in there chris, not alot of facts mate? 5 hours ago, Francie said: So was it just the dogs teeth they found, nothing else mate? The trick to discovering new things is to read it in its entirety. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.