Francie 6,368 Posted January 6, 2018 Report Share Posted January 6, 2018 2 hours ago, Blackbriar said: Unfair to blame the judge, mate. He was given an indeterminate sentence, but ordered to be detained until he was " no longer a threat to the public". The decision to release him was made solely by a panel of the parole board, who seem to have decided that the stipulation has been met.............and turned a blind eye to the fact that serving 9 years for the sexual assault of at least a dozen women might be seen by some as 'unduly lenient'. An indeterminate sentence would have allowed for him to be held beyond was is usual for that offence..........which is, I guess, why the judge handed it down ! Sadly, the decision of a parole board cannot be challenged..........not even by the Home Secretary herself. Who was on the parole board can we find out bb? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted January 6, 2018 Report Share Posted January 6, 2018 29 minutes ago, Francie said: Who was on the parole board can we find out bb? Wouldn't have thought so mate.............I have no knowledge on this, but I'm fairly sure it's kept confidential, to prevent coersion, blackmail etc - if that's not the case generally, it certainly would be in this case ! And, let's face it, who would want to own up to releasing this f***ing animal ??? Probably all manner of probation officers, social workers, psychologists, psychoanalysts and other woolly minded liberals ! 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Blackbriar said: Unfair to blame the judge, mate. He was given an indeterminate sentence, but ordered to be detained until he was " no longer a threat to the public". The decision to release him was made solely by a panel of the parole board, who seem to have decided that the stipulation has been met.............and turned a blind eye to the fact that serving 9 years for the sexual assault of at least a dozen women might be seen by some as 'unduly lenient'. An indeterminate sentence would have allowed for him to be held beyond was is usual for that offence..........which is, I guess, why the judge handed it down ! Sadly, the decision of a parole board cannot be challenged..........not even by the Home Secretary herself. Ah, but an indeterminate sentence with the proviso he served at least 8 years. 8 years isn't long enough as he will always be a danger to the public. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Blackbriar said: Wouldn't have thought so mate.............I have no knowledge on this, but I'm fairly sure it's kept confidential, to prevent coersion, blackmail etc - if that's not the case generally, it certainly would be in this case ! And, let's face it, who would want to own up to releasing this f***ing animal ??? Probably all manner of probation officers, social workers, psychologists, psychoanalysts and other woolly minded liberals ! God forbid mate, but them parole c**ts need a taste of his medicine,? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neil82 1,080 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 parole boards are probably staffed by people with degrees hanging out of their arses who have no idea about the real world outside of the utopia that their university education has drummed into them, any notion that they may be mistaken (rather that plain wrong) is something they cannot comprehend, this is whats wrong with many systems that currently govern how we are supposed to live, the c**ts have no clue what happens in the streets around us but we still keep voting for the same twats who do their utmost to ensure it keeps going on 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 Make me want to vomit in disgust. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tatsblisters 10,051 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 9 hours ago, Francie said: God forbid mate, but them parole c**ts need a taste of his medicine,? Priority should always be towards victims and their familys in crimes like this and murders.A mate of mines mother was a victim of the s.yorkshire shoe rapist some years ago she never saw that scumbag brought to justice and it had an impact on her family. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 4 hours ago, tatsblisters said: Priority should always be towards victims and their familys in crimes like this and murders.A mate of mines mother was a victim of the s.yorkshire shoe rapist some years ago she never saw that scumbag brought to justice and it had an impact on her family. See them f***ing scummy b*****d an politicians who make the laws they need f***ing hung. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 Guy is obviously a Mason 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,982 Posted January 7, 2018 Report Share Posted January 7, 2018 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.jpeg.cc7f0feb08deb4ccbfbd2e27a4df3100.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.