kanny 20,611 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 It's like he was the perfect candidate for a cover-up a ghost almost ...not even a mundane clip of him buying 20 b&h and a scratch cardIf they never come I'd be highly suspicious. In this day & age & especially in that location Paddock will be on many cameras going about his business. It could be just part of the investigation, but normally CCTV footage would be all over the place after such an incident at this stage?In this day and age it seems to be human nature to think ...I could make a few quid of this little video look a beyonce slapping her sister up lol ok maybe not on the same level but you get my drift Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 They released cctv of him trying to sue the casino tripping up on a wet floor must if been old footage Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Tried quoting & typing out a reply twice chris, but failed to 'post', I can't be arsed to type all that again, you'll just have to take my word it was a brilliant reply! Haha.... So I'd like your option, as a shooter, on the gunfire heard from the taxi. The women driver was below Paddock & round the corner, but there was defo a difference in volume between some of the volleys of gun fire & not just echo. Is it just because he change direction of gunfire? I honestly don't know, mate. My colleague who has shrapnel in his leg courtesy of Mr Paddock said it was one shooter. Are echo and ricochet still on the table? My point is law enforcement don't seek to care any other time do they Boston Paris nice and more cctv out straight away the whole thing stinks multiple gun fire unless he was firing two set ups at the same time which is likely I agree but I've seen videos where the distance of gunfire is diffrent They'll only release what they deem necessary anything that will ultimately be used in evidence isn't going to be released until they're satisfied that it's no longer useful to keep it that way. LV is one of the most surveilled areas in the world. They will have a lot of footage to go through and it won't be grainy mobile phone footage either. How much footage of the Boston/Paris/Manchester/London attacks were from multiple sources? Mandalay Bay is still one location and still a private resort. I'm not making any assumptions but it is odd Chris ..normally something leeks out somewhere Possibly and I'm not ruling out shenanigans either I'm just surprised that it's the default setting for most. Just because a story differs from the official version doesn't make it true either. his finger must been sore with the amount shots that hit there target Bump stocks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 (edited) It's like he was the perfect candidate for a cover-up a ghost almost ...not even a mundane clip of him buying 20 b&h and a scratch card If they never come I'd be highly suspicious. In this day & age & especially in that location Paddock will be on many cameras going about his business. It could be just part of the investigation, but normally CCTV footage would be all over the place after such an incident at this stage? How many people would have to be paid off to keep the secret? Hundreds? Thousands? Across multiple agencies? Not to mention all the surrounding businesses in the LV metropolitan area? 500+ wounded eye witnesses? Is it a conspiracy that it's being withheld or is it more likely that the majority of his daily goings don't warrant keeping the CCTV disk from being wiped over and over? Edited October 17, 2017 by ChrisJones 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Chris what about the timeline changing three times saying he shot at gaurd before shooting the concert now that guard has gone missing before doing tv I think he could of been an illegal in Vegas that's why he went sharpish tho Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,611 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 It's like he was the perfect candidate for a cover-up a ghost almost ...not even a mundane clip of him buying 20 b&h and a scratch card If they never come I'd be highly suspicious. In this day & age & especially in that location Paddock will be on many cameras going about his business. It could be just part of the investigation, but normally CCTV footage would be all over the place after such an incident at this stage? Modern cctv I'd imagine stores a fair size cycle of footage How many people would have to be paid off to keep the secret? Hundreds? Thousands? Across multiple agencies? Not to mention all the surrounding businesses in the LV metropolitan area? 500+ wounded eye witnesses? Is it a conspiracy that it's being withheld or is it more likely that the majority of his daily goings don't warrant keeping the CCTV disk from being wiped over and over? Modern cctv I'd imagine stores a fair size cycle of footage....this isn't 9/11 it would only take a small team to set the narrative in motion for it to run on its own steam ....this could be the boy who cried wolf of conspiracies lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 It's like he was the perfect candidate for a cover-up a ghost almost ...not even a mundane clip of him buying 20 b&h and a scratch card If they never come I'd be highly suspicious. In this day & age & especially in that location Paddock will be on many cameras going about his business. It could be just part of the investigation, but normally CCTV footage would be all over the place after such an incident at this stage? How many people would have to be paid off to keep the secret? Hundreds? Thousands? Across multiple agencies? Not to mention all the surrounding businesses in the LV metropolitan area? 500+ wounded eye witnesses? Is it a conspiracy that it's being withheld or is it more likely that the majority of his daily goings don't warrant keeping the CCTV disk from being wiped over and over? Something has to come out in the end surely? He will defiantly be on tape that hasn't been wiped. Put it this way, if Paddock was still at large, do you think the police would be struggling to get CCTV footage as part of the investigation? It's so key these days in investigations..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Chris what about the timeline changing three times saying he shot at gaurd before shooting the concert now that guard has gone missing before doing tv I think he could of been an illegal in Vegas that's why he went sharpish tho That I don't know but would it be unreasonable for the aspects of the timeline to change based on incoming evidence? We've seen a lot of news stories change over the years based on updated information. It doesn't prove or disprove a coverup though. The security guard has indeed disappeared and your hypothesis would be something I'd agree with based on the current evidence. However, if someone says he's been assassinated I want the evidence! Modern cctv I'd imagine stores a fair size cycle of footage....this isn't 9/11 it would only take a small team to set the narrative in motion for it to run on its own steam ....this could be the boy who cried wolf of conspiracies lol Okay so is it not been released because it's evidence or hasn't it been released because there's nothing newsworthy on it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Jesus Compos is apparently back in contact & will give his story when he's ready....... .....so we have to await the second coming! Haha 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Something has to come out in the end surely? He will defiantly be on tape that hasn't been wiped. Put it this way, if Paddock was still at large, do you think the police would be struggling to get CCTV footage as part of the investigation? It's so key these days in investigations..... I would expect so there are too many agencies with political agendas based on this. LVMPD's handling will be under scrutiny and right up to the politicians arguing about gun control. Many expect results. He will be on hours of CCTV footage inside the casino. They will be analysing how many bags/trips he made to his room. If Paddock was still at large you'd have the best CCTV footage available to civilians broadcasting the warts on arse if they needed to. If we don't get a satisfactory story at the end of all of this then it's over to Bacofoil convention. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,611 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Chris what about the timeline changing three times saying he shot at gaurd before shooting the concert now that guard has gone missing before doing tv I think he could of been an illegal in Vegas that's why he went sharpish tho That I don't know but would it be unreasonable for the aspects of the timeline to change based on incoming evidence? We've seen a lot of news stories change over the years based on updated information. It doesn't prove or disprove a coverup though. The security guard has indeed disappeared and your hypothesis would be something I'd agree with based on the current evidence. However, if someone says he's been assassinated I want the evidence! Modern cctv I'd imagine stores a fair size cycle of footage....this isn't 9/11 it would only take a small team to set the narrative in motion for it to run on its own steam ....this could be the boy who cried wolf of conspiracies lol Okay so is it not been released because it's evidence or hasn't it been released because there's nothing newsworthy on it? Since when has it had to be newsworthy. ..I must have seen loads of stuff over the years after a incident where it shows you some bloke filling his car up with fuel or some other unrelated to the incident other than its the person involved footage ....it just seems odd is all I'm saying. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 (edited) Since when has it had to be newsworthy. ..I must have seen loads of stuff over the years after a incident where it shows you some bloke filling his car up with fuel or some other unrelated to the incident other than its the person involved footage ....it just seems odd is all I'm saying. Okay regardless of it's news content. LV is on 24/7/365 surveillance. Could it be that they're still analyzing the footage before they deem it safe for release? The sheer volume could be an issue. I agree it's odd but I'm only going through the same information you are. I don't see anything shady at this point only a serious investigation into the largest mass shooting in US history. I can honestly see why they'd want to keep some of this info classified for a while especially as forensics are still going over it. Edited October 17, 2017 by ChrisJones Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,611 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Since when has it had to be newsworthy. ..I must have seen loads of stuff over the years after a incident where it shows you some bloke filling his car up with fuel or some other unrelated to the incident other than its the person involved footage ....it just seems odd is all I'm saying. Okay regardless of it's news content. LV is on 24/7/365 surveillance. Could it be that they're still analyzing the footage before they deem it safe for release? The sheer volume could be an issue. I agree it's odd but I'm only going through the same information you are. I don't see anything shady at this point only a serious investigation into the largest mass shooting in US history. I can honestly see why they'd want to keep some of this info classified for a while especially as forensics are still going over it. Like I said you have to put the public nature into the equation also not just the Fed's ...it's odd mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Like I said you have to put the public nature into the equation also not just the Fed's ...it's odd mate Absolutely mate. It is odd but under the circumstances, in the current time frame, absolutely plausible IMHO. Whether it remains that way remains to be seen! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,611 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Like I said you have to put the public nature into the equation also not just the Fed's ...it's odd mate Absolutely mate. It is odd but under the circumstances, in the current time frame, absolutely plausible IMHO. Whether it remains that way remains to be seen! We will have to come back to it in 54 years lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.