Dunkirk

[marshman 7,758]

Watched it last night jaysus its intense lads!

I'll have to watch it again I reckon , it makes you so proud of them men not just the soldiers but the average joes that sailed across the channel in normal small boats just because it was the right thing to do .

[Born Hunter 17,841]

I found this review interesting.

 

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/dunkirk-review/

 

It explains how ".....several historical inaccuracies come into play, though these changes are likely made for the benefit of the cameras and the audience". For anyone interested.

[marshman 7,758]

I found this review interesting.

 

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/dunkirk-review/

 

It explains how ".....several historical inaccuracies come into play, though these changes are likely made for the benefit of the cameras and the audience". For anyone interested.

lol a few inaccuracies about the altitude of the spitfires or the actual percentages the small boats saved, they where still there when the call went out, and don't detract from the fact that it was a cracking picture .

[Born Hunter 17,841]

 

I found this review interesting.

 

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/dunkirk-review/

 

It explains how ".....several historical inaccuracies come into play, though these changes are likely made for the benefit of the cameras and the audience". For anyone interested.

lol a few inaccuracies about the altitude of the spitfires or the actual percentages the small boats saved, they where still there when the call went out, and don't detract from the fact that it was a cracking picture .

 

 

I'm not.

 

It explains the historical truth as opposed to what the film has to portray to make a decent film. Purely for anyone interested in history. I found the review enlightening and thought I'd share that's all.

Edited August 11, 2017 by Born Hunter

[marshman 7,758]

 

 

 

I found this review interesting.

 

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/dunkirk-review/

 

It explains how ".....several historical inaccuracies come into play, though these changes are likely made for the benefit of the cameras and the audience". For anyone interested.

lol a few inaccuracies about the altitude of the spitfires or the actual percentages the small boats saved, they where still there when the call went out, and don't detract from the fact that it was a cracking picture .

I'm not.

 

It explains the historical truth as opposed to what the film has to portray to make a decent film. Purely for anyone interested in history. I found the review enlightening and thought I'd share that's all.

 

I think you may of misunderstood I'm not saying " You're " detracting from it being a good film . I'm saying a few inaccuracies doesn't make it a bad film .

Reading that last sentence I I should've put it doesn't instead of don't lol

Unless I've misunderstood lol ?

Edited August 11, 2017 by marshman

[Born Hunter 17,841]

 

 

 

I think you may of misunderstood I'm not saying " You're " detracting from it being a good film . I'm saying a few inaccuracies doesn't make it a bad film .

 

Unless I've misunderstood lol

 

 

Good to hear and I agree! I haven't seen it yet though but I am very much looking forward to.

[marshman 7,758]

 

 

 

 

I think you may of misunderstood I'm not saying " You're " detracting from it being a good film . I'm saying a few inaccuracies doesn't make it a bad film .

 

Unless I've misunderstood lol

Good to hear and I agree! I haven't seen it yet though but I am very much looking forward to.

go and see it mate you won't be disappointed ?

[sussex 5,802]

I'll second that well worth a watch ...

[waltjnr 7,423]

i saw it in a 4DX cinema ,thought it was pants ,the bus crash in albert square had more drama! Seriously over hyped ! give me Platoon any day!

[mackem 28,714]

I saw it the day it came out and gave it 6/10 wasn't all that.

[j j m 6,596]

not saw it yet