Knock Knock

[Waz 4,266]

What with dirty thieving scum and dirty grasses its a wonder that some dont loose the plot

[MOLE265 792]

 

 

 

Without doubt whoever did it is a c**t and deserves everything he gets. Trouble is, being 99% certain of who it was isn't the same as knowing for definite.

 

You can't go mentioning names of suspects until you have proof.

 

This isn't taking sides, it's being fair.

It was plucky

Or, for the devious mind, it was Th himself, known he had all in order, easy way to shaft your nemesis.

Nope it was definately plucky

There's a rat in the kitchen what am I gonna do....

there's a rat in the kitchen what am I gonna do

 

Get a Plummer terrier!!!!!

 

There's a wee bit of UB40 for yeez lol.

[mushroom 13,177]

If the law is involved, then even if you do know who it is, it's best to keep schum. Any interferring with a witness/conplaintiff does NOT go down well, especially during an on-going/active case.

 

Any public naming etc can and will be seen as harrassment, which will fall right into the slimy, grassing, weasel cnut's hands, whoever he/she is!

 

You'll wait hours for your dog to do the job, no? Patience is key, give them rope and grasses WILL hang themselves

 

On the otherhand if you boys were being naughty, then accept the consequences and deal with it quietly. Still, it doesn't justify grassing and having a man's kennels put to the sword IMHO that is a cnuts trick.

[walshie 2,804]

I know you want to talk about this, but as I explained we can't have a name put up without 100% definite proof, which I can't see we have.

 

The same member putting the same name up over and over isn't proof and I can't spend all day removing the same name so this thread is locked.

 

Sorry.