Hydropotesinermis 724 Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 Yes, very good. If it's any reflection on the truth then f**k me! I've also recently watched Miss Sloane which is about US lobbiests and gun control and last night I watched Arrival which is very similar to Interstellar. All very good. Interstellar was wank born mate! Ffs where do I start with the problems with the physics and maths in that film Please do because you're talking bollocks. LolTime as a physical dimension to start with. Some c**t thinking they can signal across intergalactic space. Pushing books out of a bookshelf Feel free to dispel my statement at any time Does any of that break currently established laws of nature though? All sci-fi is based on a speculative premise, what makes it good sci-fi, other than the obvious need for theatrics, is being self consistent and not violating known natural laws. Not sure what you mean by time being a physical dimension? Do you mean real, like spacial dimensions and forces etc? Or are you saying that time travel has been proven to be impossible? I can't remember how they signal across intergalactic space, I need to watch the film again. Do you mean when they transmitted data back to Earth on the planets they each went to? Surely that was through the wormhole? Generally speaking, the science was very good for a film. But then it should with a theoretical physicist refusing to work on it as executive producer unless they used all of his calculations for the science. Very few have tried to portray such grand science so closely to the theory, beyond the obvious speculative premise. Still not buying it lol Come on you are going to have to do better than that! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 13,372 Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 Yes, very good. If it's any reflection on the truth then f**k me! I've also recently watched Miss Sloane which is about US lobbiests and gun control and last night I watched Arrival which is very similar to Interstellar. All very good. Interstellar was wank born mate! Ffs where do I start with the problems with the physics and maths in that film Please do because you're talking bollocks. LolTime as a physical dimension to start with. Some c**t thinking they can signal across intergalactic space. Pushing books out of a bookshelf Feel free to dispel my statement at any time Does any of that break currently established laws of nature though? All sci-fi is based on a speculative premise, what makes it good sci-fi, other than the obvious need for theatrics, is being self consistent and not violating known natural laws. Not sure what you mean by time being a physical dimension? Do you mean real, like spacial dimensions and forces etc? Or are you saying that time travel has been proven to be impossible? I can't remember how they signal across intergalactic space, I need to watch the film again. Do you mean when they transmitted data back to Earth on the planets they each went to? Surely that was through the wormhole? Generally speaking, the science was very good for a film. But then it should with a theoretical physicist refusing to work on it as executive producer unless they used all of his calculations for the science. Very few have tried to portray such grand science so closely to the theory, beyond the obvious speculative premise. Still not buying it lolCome on you are going to have to do better than that! One word.... Gravity Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.