jacknife 2,005 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 If people are going to have the exclusive right to choose then it must apply on the flip side.... Abortion and the right to die or to refuse treatment like the johovas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Of course I agree. The right to decide what happens to your own body, what could be more important than that. Who has the right to administer any form of treatment on you unless YOU give consent first? It's the exclusive right you have as a human being. What don't people understand about that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Its all very well taking a moral stance on here, but remember you don't kniw the ins and outs of these cases nor are you drs! Im pretty sure a sane adult can refuse treatment! These special cases are for children and the mentally impaired. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 The ins and outs make no difference to the question of who decides. Do you have the choice to decide what happens to your own body or that of your child, or the system!? The answer should be obvious to those of us who live in a free society or who want to. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stumfelter 3,034 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Of course I agree. The right to decide what happens to your own body, what could be more important than that. Who has the right to administer any form of treatment on you unless YOU give consent first? It's the exclusive right you have as a human being. What don't people understand about that. But we are talking about a child here, as he can't make his own decisions they have to be made for him so who is in the best position to decide? A team of doctors who have dedicated their lives to medicine or his emotionally involved parents? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 His parents of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Qbgrey 4,088 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 in and out of court still now,ffs spend sometime with the lad,if one of mine was ill,id be f****d if im going on camera every 5 mins. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stumfelter 3,034 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 His parents of course. So if the poor little mite is in constant pain with no quality of life and his parents are emotionally driven to keep him alive because there his parents that makes it alright? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 His parents are responsible for their child's life and they are the ones that carry the responsibility, no one else. Tough decisions are on the shoulders of parents, not the state. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dogmandont 9,802 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Bolloxs neo, so the state should let every parent make every decision for there child? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 If the parents were able to take the bairn out of hospital care to look after him, I dunno how they'd manage to keep him alive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,500 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Resources are finite is it right that a child with no hope should be using those resources when a child with hope could be using them I don't think so ... someone has to draw a line . 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Bolloxs neo, so the state should let every parent make every decision for there child? If the parents themselves are grown adults who are responsible citizens and were capable of bringing the child into the world, then of course they have the right to make all decisions for their children. Your not one of these trolls are you. Amazing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neobliviscaris1776 1,998 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 If the parents were able to take the bairn out of hospital care to look after him, I dunno how they'd manage to keep him alive.[/quote If the NHS hadn't stopped the parents in the first place from recieving treatment earlier abroad, perhaps things may have been different. Who do the NHS think they are that they can refuse parents seeking alternative treatment for their child, unbelievable disinterest and lack of empathy for such situations, and way beyond their role in society. Remember it's the national health SERVICE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Bolloxs neo, so the state should let every parent make every decision for there child? If the parents themselves are grown adults who are responsible citizens and were capable of bringing the child into the world, then of course they have the right to make all decisions for their children. Your not one of these trolls are you. Amazing You're not one of those troll cry babies that can't stand an opposing view are you? Incredible. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.