Fox

[stop.end 4,079]

Oohhh id much rathsr be what i am, than a 2 faced snivelling wee rat that waits till folk walk out room to slate em haha you wanna become a lawyer yer talents are wasted on here ye dreamer haha haha

A snivelling wee rat hmm wonder you got that stupid information must be watching cartoons and perfecting haha..lol listen to wee girls second hand chat again i see..on a computer too.. you are a bi squaddie who likes too wear womens underwear.. lamp and ferret some rabbits and scran wee rat catchers off here for free... no biggie if thats the way you roll but dont try and chat silly to someone you have no clue about.

[stop.end 4,079]

Wasn't the Dangerous Dogs Act amended so you're committing the offense of your dog being out of control in a public place if it attacks a wild animal?

 

I seem to remember that being the case but I'm not 100%, will have to go and check the amendments.

 

 

 

Just had a look and it seems that was talked about but in the end wasn't included, someone actually used common sense which is quite shocking actually!

Sweet lord above..you have just proved yourself to be the clown you are corbyn jr...a lurcher whatever x is a family pet yous for its origanal purpose..work..they are socialised with family..friends children and other dogs..livestock and every other situation you can imagine..how the fek is that a dangerous dog....

[Welsh_red 4,644]

This place is cringey with its bitching and slagging each other off sometimes

[neil cooney 10,416]

 

Oohhh id much rathsr be what i am, than a 2 faced snivelling wee rat that waits till folk walk out room to slate em haha you wanna become a lawyer yer talents are wasted on here ye dreamer haha haha

A snivelling wee rat hmm wonder you got that stupid information must be watching cartoons and perfecting haha..lol listen to wee girls second hand chat again i see..on a computer too.. you are a bi squaddie who likes too wear womens underwear.. lamp and ferret some rabbits and scran wee rat catchers off here for free... no biggie if thats the way you roll but dont try and chat silly to someone you have no clue about.

 

Nothing to do with the "can you kill a fox with a lurcher or not" debate but reading your post there Stopend are you still a Rep for the IWTF in Northern ireland ?

It's a genuine question and the reason I asked is because I'd find it hard to believe someone representing a club would write such childish name calling drivel.

[BGD 6,436]

 

Wasn't the Dangerous Dogs Act amended so you're committing the offense of your dog being out of control in a public place if it attacks a wild animal?

 

I seem to remember that being the case but I'm not 100%, will have to go and check the amendments.

 

 

 

Just had a look and it seems that was talked about but in the end wasn't included, someone actually used common sense which is quite shocking actually!

Sweet lord above..you have just proved yourself to be the clown you are corbyn jr...a lurcher whatever x is a family pet yous for its origanal purpose..work..they are socialised with family..friends children and other dogs..livestock and every other situation you can imagine..how the fek is that a dangerous dog....

Where did I say a lurcher was dangerous you total clown, I was talking about a proposed change to the law. Take your argument up with the lawmakers who proposed it.

 

Still waiting for you to quote the relevant section of the Hunting Act that says it's legal to slip a lurcher on a bolting fox, seems you're incapable of providing a source for your stupid and dangerous statement....

[stop.end 4,079]

I know folk that have met you, face to face, you know npbody that knows me haha

are you really trying to have a dig that i work for a living, only on thl would ye get slated for having a job ffs, get over it i was in army, or cant ye get a mental pic of me in my uniform out ye lil shite bag head haha

 

My 10 year old lad was given a pup, iv done nowt for it other than drive him to collect it an to vets, but that shows your true colours again dont it, making out its mine haha

 

You are a weasel of a man with the reputation of talking about folk behind there backs as soon as they leave room, fcuk id rather have been a serving poofter in salvation army and be begging every member on heres cast offs, than be what you are hahahahaha an ye try deny it ffs haha

Lol..and there you have it..you know people who know me doubt it but sure its the internet i heard politicans work for the people.. and met me face to face..and what happened..fek all..what ever supposed stories you heard..hear.. the internet son thats all it is..now bgd go do your own research i dont give legal advice i just give opinions.

[BGD 6,436]

Oh I've done plenty of research and all of it points to you being a total clown who's talking out of his arse on a subject he knows very little about.

 

Happy to be proven wrong though

[jackthelad 1,893]

so if your walking the dogs before bed and they lift something are u breaking the law if u lift the beasty? Even if u never set out to hunt anything ?

[Saltmoon 2,208]

so if your walking the dogs before bed and they lift something are u breaking the law if u lift the beasty? Even if u never set out to hunt anything ?

It's about reasonable dout if you was out on a walk and something happened and that was not you intention then whoever was bringing charges for such "offence" would have a job proving otherwise however they will check everything conversations through that day and if lamping had been mentioned then they would use that against you. But back to the question they would argue the fact but in the end they would not be able to charge unless evidence suggest otherwise. So if it was just a walk and something happened then I'd say you'd be fine.