3175darren 1,101 Posted June 6, 2017 Report Share Posted June 6, 2017 I am an ex miner, born on a council estate in a mining community, as a lot of other people on here probably were, I am disgusted with the Labour Party, I feel sick when I see that smug dickhead, I will never vote labour again I think that's a certainty, my old man would turn in his grave, if he saw them now, this country is in a dire situation, it feels like we are heading for the scrap heap, god knows what kind of life my kids will have, Me aswell mate I despair at some of the ex miners I see comment on some mining facebook pages thinking that Corbyn is going to get all the pension money sorted when all labour have said is they will review it.Robbing b*****ds anyone else would have been locked for stealing pension money, they have systematically thrown away all the wealth of this country, and virtually bankrupted us, the Labour Party will have no intention of ever letting the people vote on anything, I don't like conservative's either, however they did give us a vote, and at the end of the day, they are supposed to run the country on our behalf, not there's, 1 Quote Link to post
horsedrawn 38 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Eric Blair sums up the Labour Party in Animal Farm and 1984. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others and 2+2 is whatever big brother wants it to be. The Labour Party spend decades hating the so called toffs only to accept a peerage as soon as it is offered. Kinnock Prescott etc. Strange that Orwell and Tony share the same surname 1 Quote Link to post
Saluki71 110 Posted June 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 It's simple if the conservatives get a big majority then the hunting ban will be repealed. I know it's not great for everyone but surely having freedom to hunt without fear of arrest is a basic human right. Incidentally I've just looked at the hunting act and noted that you can chase an hare with a dog if you intend to eat the said hare. Quote Link to post
forest of dean redneck 11,711 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 I don't think the ban will be reversed tbh,but this is the first I've heard about the meat farming being mentioned? Quote Link to post
3175darren 1,101 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 I don't think the ban will be reversed tbh,but this is the first I've heard about the meat farming being mentioned?it might not get reversed, but any chance is better than no chance, in my book, Quote Link to post
skycat 6,173 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 It's simple if the conservatives get a big majority then the hunting ban will be repealed. I know it's not great for everyone but surely having freedom to hunt without fear of arrest is a basic human right. Incidentally I've just looked at the hunting act and noted that you can chase an hare with a dog if you intend to eat the said hare. Where does it say that? 5 Quote Link to post
Shaddy93 840 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Fcuk them they can ban what they want it's just a word it certainly won't stop me 2 Quote Link to post
roybo 2,873 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 It's not just the labour party,the Tories are just as bad. I emailed my local Tory candidate,she said she voted for the bill last time ,and IF she gets elected she'll discuss it with me more ,but for animal welfare reasons shed probably vote the same this time. Quote Link to post
Saluki71 110 Posted June 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Hunting act Schedule 1 of exempt hunting Hunting a wild mammal is exempt if the conditions of this paragraph are satisfied: The first condition is that it is undertaken for the purpose of (1) preventing serious damage to crops (ii) to wild birds and livestock Subsection B Obtaining meat to be used for animal or human consumption as long as it is not classed as a field trail, other than a coursing event, i.e. Two dogs or less. There are more sections but I didn't see the need to write it all as it's not relevant to this particular reply. The hunting act is so open to interpretation it's a laughable piece of legislation. 2 Quote Link to post
david jones 97 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 You have got to be brain dead to vote for that wet flannel of a man Jeremy Corbyn If he gets into power we are all really in sh###t. 2 Quote Link to post
Bobtheferret 1,252 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 God help this country if that total c*** Corbyn gets elected. Never before have I seen such a fanatical lunatic in mainstream politics, how anyone can vote for him is beyond me. 1 Quote Link to post
david jones 97 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 If that man gets in to power I can honestly say hand on heart I will be very worried for my young family as that man, don't like using force and at this moment in time this country needs force more than ever from all this terrorist crap going on he hasn't got it in him he won't rule with a iron fist this country needs. He is to wet. Quote Link to post
3175darren 1,101 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Fcuk them they can ban what they want it's just a word it certainly won't stop meme neither, but I would rather they recognised my human right to hunt, Quote Link to post
socks 32,253 Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 Hunting act Schedule 1 of exempt hunting Hunting a wild mammal is exempt if the conditions of this paragraph are satisfied: The first condition is that it is undertaken for the purpose of (1) preventing serious damage to crops (ii) to wild birds and livestock Subsection B Obtaining meat to be used for animal or human consumption as long as it is not classed as a field trail, other than a coursing event, i.e. Two dogs or less. There are more sections but I didn't see the need to write it all as it's not relevant to this particular reply. The hunting act is so open to interpretation it's a laughable piece of legislation. However these paragraphs fukc all that up ....... 7)The fifth condition is that— (a)reasonable steps are taken for the purpose of ensuring that as soon as possible after being found or flushed out the wild mammal is shot dead by a competent person, and (b)in particular, each dog used in the stalking or flushing out is kept under sufficiently close control to ensure that it does not prevent or obstruct achievement of the objective in paragraph (a). 2 Quote Link to post
Saluki71 110 Posted June 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2017 (edited) Exactly it's so contradictory because they are set out in different subsections, if it's all in one section and not paraphrased then there is no way around it, but laws are set out to be contentious so they can be challenged by the people. Hopefully the dreaded and discriminatory hunting act will be a thing of the past should Mrs may get a good majority. On a different and sadder note I've just read a story in the mail online that two weeks after the I.R.A bombed Manchester a few years ago Jeremy Corbin hosted a get together for the provisional I.R.A in London at his then office, where they joked about the Brighton hotel bombing. This man is a communist out of the top drawer. Maybe putin will be his best mate or is that Hamas. Edited June 8, 2017 by Saluki71 1 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.