Tommy Robinson How Is He Viewed In Britain At The Moment

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

If the Muslims werent' worried before ,they f***ing are  now .Only saw a handful cowering in shops .they did try to cancel it via train stations and Facebook and some never went as a result but 20000 plus  likeminded souls says it all .

[waltjnr 6,775]

My boy just told me it clashed with a naked cycle ride? Any truth in this, or is the little swine winding me up? 

[slip lead 862]

Shame more turned out for a f***ing football match, than for their childrens future, says a lot about the people of Britain today..

[ChrisJones 7,975]

3 minutes ago, John d said:

Lol or maybe folk have other things to be doing? Did you go?

Maybe they can see the futility in protesting for the release of guy that breached his own suspended sentence conditions and later admitted guilt on the advice of his barrister.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

[slip lead 862]

His solicitor was told no need to represent him as he is being released.

 

Then when he was given a duty solicitor that advertised him to plead guilty, as he will only get a fine.

 

He was imprisoned to shut him up, just like the bird that came forward about the rape gangs, she now doing two years.

 

An old lady that complained about praying in the park, was later harassed at home, and taken to the station and put in a cell for hours

 

People that wonted to attend the march was threatened at manchester train station with section 32 orders if they got on the train.

 

Saying on the underground that the march was cancelled even on motorways saying the same.

 

It far far bigger that Tommy Robinson and if you think the only people that went, went just for tommy your wrong

 

I think people really need to start walking about with there f***ing eyes open

[king 11,972]

Chris/John.

Maybe you would have a different outlook if your daughters were the victims of them dirty fecking rape gangs.

Never mind ey.

Just keep taking the piss out of a lad who is trying his best to inform the general public of the sick twisted perverted stuff that's going on in this country.

 

[king 11,972]

Yea crack on John.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

8 minutes ago, slip lead said:

I think people really need to start walking about with there f***ing eyes open

That works on both sides of the street. Tommy's barrister has 16 years of criminal trial experience under his belt. He was advised to plead guilty because he was utterly slam dunk bang to rights. If you want to march for free speech crack on but if you seriously think a digital petition and turning a few heads into Westminster is going to get his conviction overturned then you're going to need to stock up on train fair because he ain't coming out until the system says he can.

2 minutes ago, king said:

Chris/John.

Maybe you would have a different outlook if your daughters were the victims of them dirty fecking rape gangs.

Never mind ey.

Just keep taking the piss out of a lad who is trying his best to inform the general public of the sick twisted perverted stuff that's going on in this country.

 

Not taking the piss out of Tommy. Taking the piss out of the fact that for an investigative journalist he didn't do much investigating why there was a media ban and why he got done for what he did for the second time.

I fully understand that there's a problem in Britain but what is still stunningly obvious is that these vulnerable kids are being put into these positions by people representing the establishment but no one ever seems to give much of a f*ck about that on here. Only if they're brown.

Some of us are trying to inform the general public that while we fully understand that asian grooming gangs are a problem so are white paedophile rings. Offenders have been outed as high ranking members of society and the establishment. The consistent failure of the predominantly white-skinned leftist/socialist establishment to identify and protect these vulnerable kids has also been done to death on this forum but again because Tommy speaks da troof and tellz it lik it iz no one seems to be overly concerned that while these people offend against kids there is a bigger gang of complicit players that ignore it and in worse cases actually cover it up. The local authority.

Never mind though eh? You're more likely to be abused by a close family member but why point out that all of the sick perverted stuff going on when you can narrow the focus much more dramatically?

 

[slip lead 862]

The judge that put him down was clearly seen,  in the live stream watching from the window.

 

In law he is now a witness to the so called crime, how the f**k can he then be the judge in the case.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

9 minutes ago, slip lead said:

The judge that put him down was clearly seen,  in the live stream watching from the window.

 

In law he is now a witness to the so called crime, how the f**k can he then be the judge in the case.

That simply isn't true. Witnessing the arrest of an individual doesn't preclude the judge from dealing with them in these circumstances but don't take my word for it. Ask a brief.

I support free speech as much as the next man but this isn't about free speech. It's about contempt of court and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that. If you support due process (and I do) this was dealt with completely and utterly within the law. If you think the law for reporting on trials is sh*t then, by all means, start a petition and demonstrate to have that changed.

Again. Good luck with that.

[slip lead 862]

Its about making a stand, not a release.

We all know they will make him do every day of his sentence.

Read his book and you might get to understand what the power that be,  do to people that try to shine a light.

 

Just like they are starting to do to anyone thats trying to get the truth out about the 3 young lads that got run over and murdered by terrorist, but they are saying was an accident.

 

 

[slip lead 862]

3 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

That simply isn't true. Witnessing the arrest of an individual doesn't preclude the judge from dealing with them in these circumstances but don't take my word for it. Ask a brief.

I support free speech as much as the next man but this isn't about free speech. It's about contempt of court and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that. If you support due process (and I do) this was dealt with completely and utterly within the law. If you think the law for reporting on trials is sh*t then, by all means, start a petition and demonstrate to have that changed.

Again. Good luck with that.

What was his contempt, all what he said was already available to the public.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

1 minute ago, slip lead said:

What was his contempt, all what he said was already available to the public.

I've already gone through it earlier in the thread but he was in breach of reporting restrictions. He expressed his views on the guilt/innocence of the defendants, in a live trial, seriously risking the integrity of the trial. You cannot do that under British law.

He knew he shouldn't be doing it! He committed the same offence Canterbury Crown Court last year was handed a suspended sentence on condition that he didn't do it again. He did it again and was dealt with exactly how the earlier judge said he would be.

 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

13 minutes ago, slip lead said:

Its about making a stand, not a release.

That's fair enough and I applaud that.