Tommy Robinson How Is He Viewed In Britain At The Moment

[Kerny92 1,246]

1 minute ago, ChrisJones said:

 

Seriously? You want to give this government the power to deport citizens based on popular opinion? And you honestly think they're going to use this power justly against the population?!

Giving vultures a cop out? Who do you think has systematically ignored these vulnerable kids since day one. It begins with 'G.' Local, national, and the enforcement wing.

Sorry I didn't have a sarcasm emoticon.

No i want them to do it after a thorough investigation, the facts are there are numerous gangs across the country involved in these disgusting crimes. 

I agree the system is either inept or corrupt, but you can't just blame the man who invented the gun. 

[Kerny92 1,246]

6 minutes ago, slip lead said:

It coming fella, and I think it will be the worst the country has ever witnessed..

Is it though really? The Manchester bombing tell me we've already rolled over and accepted defeat.

Edited May 28, 2018 by Kerny92

[ChrisJones 7,975]

17 minutes ago, Kerny92 said:

No i want them to do it after a thorough investigation, the facts are there are numerous gangs across the country involved in these disgusting crimes. 

I agree the system is either inept or corrupt, but you can't just blame the man who invented the gun. 

I'll break this down as easily as I can.

• This grooming gang has already been convicted. They were awaiting sentencing.
• The establishment isn't a historical entity. It's a currently elected body across the United Kingdom
• The establishment has been using decades of political correctness to avoid dealing with these people at political and law enforcement level.
• The establishment is demonstrably inept and negligent in its duties.
• You want this establishment to conduct thorough investigations and conduct deportations based on those findings.

This isn't about blaming the man who invented the gun this is about focusing on a shock journalist and ignoring the systematic problems in the local authority that has allowed thousands of girls at the national level to abused.

Edited May 28, 2018 by ChrisJones
Typo

[villaman 9,983]

24 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

He was in contempt of court, mate.

The last time he was convicted of doing what he's just done the judge gave him a suspended sentence saying that if he did it again he would be sent to prison.

He did it again.

But he did nothing wrong ,look at the vid I put up 

[slip lead 862]

There stopping at least one terrorists attack every month, who knows whats next.

They have chopped off a soldiers head in London, killed children in Manchester, the police are even hiding attacks, "the three young boys".

 

Still only 25,000 at best at the marches, I just hope people start waking up, they have at best 5 percent of the population, what will that be when my gran kids are my age.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

Just now, villaman said:

But he did nothing wrong ,look at the vid I put up 

I'm not disputing your video. He was in contempt of court by turning up. Simply being there with a film crew was enough for the rescinding of his suspended sentence. That's what they said the last time he did it.

 

[slip lead 862]

2 minutes ago, villaman said:

But he did nothing wrong ,look at the vid I put up 

He was in contempt because of reporting on a previous case.

that a reporter on LBC radio had also said there names.

 

It all about silencing him.

[slip lead 862]

Try and have a look at Douglas Murray on utude. Douglas Murray on tommy robinson (and the establishment)

Edited May 28, 2018 by slip lead
Correction

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Personally I don' care if the stinking c**ts havnt put a foot wrong ever ,they aren' welcome in my England .All these crimes and hate speeches are a product of one thing .Islam 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Lucky to have two wheels that lad 

[mackem 26,486]

[kanny 20,607]

44 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

I'm not disputing your video. He was in contempt of court by turning up. Simply being there with a film crew was enough for the rescinding of his suspended sentence. That's what they said the last time he did it.

 

From my understand he was charged with contempt the first time because he actually entered the court building but he didn't do that this time in fact on the ful  live stream he can clearly be heard on numerous occasions asking the plod the boundaries of the court house he also states numerous  times on the live feed that he's unable to report on the full facts because of a media blackout. ..for sure he made himself a easy target showing up at court but from the evidence I've seen so far it doesn't look like he was in the wrong and didn't break his suspended sentence conditions. 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

14 minutes ago, foxdropper said:

All these crimes and hate speeches are a product of one thing .Islam 

It was the European Court Of Human Rights that muddied the water with freedoms of speech. They ruled that free speech can be restricted "to punish improper attacks on objects of religious veneration." and this can be done in the event of a pressing social need (the need for social peace.)

The content of what constitutes a breach of this ruling has been passed to the individual member states.

Your government.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

4 minutes ago, kanny said:

From my understand he was charged with contempt the first time because he actually entered the court building but he didn't do that this time in fact on the ful  live stream he can clearly be heard on numerous occasions asking the plod the boundaries of the court house he also states numerous  times on the live feed that he's unable to report on the full facts because of a media blackout. ..for sure he made himself a easy target showing up at court but from the evidence I've seen so far it doesn't look like he was in the wrong and didn't break his suspended sentence conditions. 

The most I got on it was what I posted a few pages back. Combine his proximity to the court with the media blackout and you've got grounds.

I honestly don't know whether his contempt charge is legit or not but he wasn't arrested for freedom of speech as the majority are reporting on. I've noticed also that the UKIP tweet earlier in the thread doesn't mention that the arrest was wrong only that if he comes to harm in prison they're prosecuting.