j j m 6,555 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 it will be down to Charlie boy weather he would make her queen or not Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bird 9,969 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 She wouldn't be queen anyway She shouldn't be but Charles can make her Queen once he's King if he so wishes. And he's already said he'll do that. well i wont go to the wedding ,fook him !!! i go for nice mooch instead with the dogs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 She wouldn't be queen anyway She shouldn't be but Charles can make her Queen once he's King if he so wishes. And he's already said he'll do that. well i wont go to the wedding ,fook him !!! i go for nice mooch instead with the dogs They've been married for years Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lanesra 3,994 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 Why isn't Philip the King of England , as going by what Yous are saying if Charlie boy was too become king that automatically makes Camilla Queen ?? I'd of thought she'd of just got a royal title ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 Why isn't Philip the King of England , as going by what Yous are saying if Charlie boy was too become king that automatically makes Camilla Queen ?? I'd of thought she'd of just got a royal title ?? Normally she'd be Princess Consort, but Charles has said he would make her Queen if/when he becomes King. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 The title of King outranks the title of Queen, that's why the consort of a ruling female monarch here doesn't have the title of king.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 The title of King outranks the title of Queen, that's why the consort of a ruling female monarch here doesn't have the title of king.. So, it's a bit like poker, then ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,400 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 The title of King outranks the title of Queen, that's why the consort of a ruling female monarch here doesn't have the title of king.. So, it's a bit like poker, then ? But not chess?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Squeamish5 309 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 The title of King outranks the title of Queen, that's why the consort of a ruling female monarch here doesn't have the title of king..Hmm, why do those pesky feminists keep bleating on about equality.....? (Not bangin a drum, just flaggin it up, before anyone starts getting all bristly) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,497 Posted May 5, 2017 Report Share Posted May 5, 2017 What charles 60 odd unless he stays on till hes 95 like his dad its no going to be worth it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted May 6, 2017 Report Share Posted May 6, 2017 Camilla isnt just anyone, she has to be related somehow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted May 6, 2017 Report Share Posted May 6, 2017 I couldn't give a shite to be honest, Camilla not done anything wrong other than marry the man she fellin love with many years ago. If he makes her Queen then fine. It's only the ones who bleat on about "the queen of hearts" who have any objection but lets face it she and her dowy eyes wasn't all that innocent. OK question do you think her death was an accident? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
David.evans 5,323 Posted May 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2017 No Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted May 6, 2017 Report Share Posted May 6, 2017 I'm not one for conspiracy theories however I must admit there are several things that make me wonder, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted May 6, 2017 Report Share Posted May 6, 2017 Yes it was a tragic accident imo. Her paranoia was a factor. Telling the goverment she no longer wanted royal protection as she belived they were spying on her. If they were protecting her that accident would never have happened. As far as he state and more importantly the monarchy severed links with her after divorce she was no longer a HRH do what she wanted as far they were concerned. If you need proof of that you only need to look how the monarchy behaved after her death.They only changed there mind when most of the British public behaved like idiots outside buck house. Look at princess margaret she was prob the founder of being a "good time girl" lol they didnt kill her and she was still a member of the royals. also can you see the queen or state taking such an action against tge future kings mother .Killing her grandchildrens mother if that ever came out would finish them. As i said in an earlier thread some people can and will look for conspiracies in everything! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.