Nik_B 3,790 Posted May 3, 2017 Report Share Posted May 3, 2017 THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES Page 24 in a science magazine, those scientists have balls, it's got to be career suicide http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,437 Posted May 3, 2017 Report Share Posted May 3, 2017 Sod the towers i enjoyed the article about using omnipresent radiation like cosmic muons for imaging.........right up my street all that. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,708 Posted May 3, 2017 Report Share Posted May 3, 2017 Sod the towers i enjoyed the article about using omnipresent radiation like cosmic muons for imaging.........right up my street all that. Sod the towers i enjoyed the article about using omnipresent radiation like cosmic muons for imaging.........right up my street all that. It was the Nucleosynthetic fingerprints of the first stars that caught my attention ...can you just summarize it nik. ... my eyes are tierd lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted May 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2017 Sod the towers i enjoyed the article about using omnipresent radiation like cosmic muons for imaging.........right up my street all that. Sod the towers i enjoyed the article about using omnipresent radiation like cosmic muons for imaging.........right up my street all that. It was the Nucleosynthetic fingerprints of the first stars that caught my attention ...can you just summarize it nik. ... my eyes are tierd lol I would but I thought his theory had more holes in it that Swiss cheese Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sussex 5,777 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 I bet them old boys are a laugh on a night out ? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 Surely the main question is not wat the unusual transport properties of the topological Dirac metal Na3Bi is but how is it possible these people ever got a girlfriend? 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,798 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 I bet them old boys are a laugh on a night out You don't have to be old to be that boring. I'm presenting a paper this Summer! Hahaha! I expect you'll all be Attending? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 Wouldnt miss it for the world born lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deadeye18 164 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 Career ending article for sure. I was convinced from the start it was a false flag attack after 3 things I saw #1 they found one of the hijackers plastic I'd cards in the rubble even though jet fuel burns at silly high temperatures,#2 a forensic scientist found traces of thermite in the dust and was sacked when he told everyone #3 there was no plane that hit the Pentagon it was a missile, no plane wreckage recovered and a government press release confirmed that aircraft landed safely at a nearby airport.Even the security camera footage of the impact shows no aircraft. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 I'd be interested to know your thoughts on the subject Nik? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogMan85 722 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 I just can't see how they could get everyone to hold their water, someone would blow their whistle. Killing all those innocent people and and daring to risk being found out seems unbelievable to me. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 I just can't see how they could get everyone to hold their water, someone would blow their whistle. Killing all those innocent people and and daring to risk being found out seems unbelievable to me. It's seems completely unbelievable doesn't it? I just find the official story equally so..... 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rabbit Hunter 6,613 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) I've watched numerous videos on Youtube about this. Like has been said, the towers fell too easy and also WHY did the 3rd tower fall despite being untouched??? But like Dogman says, it would havto involve hundreds of people and could they keep it to themselves and have no conscience? Edited May 4, 2017 by Rabbit Hunter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,798 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 So here's the obvious problem with the controlled explosion 'theory'. You're a evil genius in the Bush administration with the strategic goal of invading a list of Middle Eastern states and decide the best way to do that is with a false flag operation. I can buy all that right, but here's my problem.... What's being suggested is that the buildings were rigged and demolished. Yet your strategic goal isn't to demolish the buildings, it's to create national outrage and the will to fight a series of wars. So why the f**k would you choose such a tactically risky way of achieving that? Why would you risk leaving what would be a huge trail of crumbs? What's the alternative........ well why not genuinely give some radicals the opportunity to actually hijack planes and fly them into the buildings? Set up a patsy from a long list. Far more easily covered up and achieves exactly the same goal! The building didn't have to fall, it wasn't necessary and would have been very risky to carry out. It makes no sense. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted May 4, 2017 Report Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) So here's the obvious problem with the controlled explosion 'theory'. You're a evil genius in the Bush administration with the strategic goal of invading a list of Middle Eastern states and decide the best way to do that is with a false flag operation. I can buy all that right, but here's my problem.... What's being suggested is that the buildings were rigged and demolished. Yet your strategic goal isn't to demolish the buildings, it's to create national outrage and the will to fight a series of wars. So why the f**k would you choose such a tactically risky way of achieving that? Why would you risk leaving what would be a huge trail of crumbs? What's the alternative........ well why not genuinely give some radicals the opportunity to actually hijack planes and fly them into the buildings? Set up a patsy from a long list. Far more easily covered up and achieves exactly the same goal! The building didn't have to fall, it wasn't necessary and would have been very risky to carry out. It makes no sense. I agree with all of that, why? why? why? I can't get my head round it & have no real conspiracy theory to back it..... ...but? Haha......I just can't get it out of my head how those buildings would fall like that? Thats just coming from a simple minded guy like myself, but when you add hundreds of doubts from professionals with a structural background......it makes it hard to ignore? Edited May 4, 2017 by Accip74 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.