Mary 352 Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 good video but he not a bit impartial is he. Do you think there is not one person on the planet who has not sinned or broken a commandment, and who is not sorry about it, are they all going to hell, and what about people who have never heard of God, South American Indians who believe in banana trees, when they die, are the going to hell? And a bit off topic but did Jesus spend some time with the Druids of Ireland and England, learning there craft and taking magic mushrooms. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 That's where he read up on how to appear to reappear . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,913 Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 27, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feck Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 20,913 Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feckAny thing is possible in 4 billion years and a bit of luck good and bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greg64 2,868 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Floods are floods a natural process no magic needed. same with moses and the burning bush that is a natural , creosote bushes that in dry weather do ignite Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feckAny thing is possible in 4 billion years and a bit of luck good and bad. Mate think about 4 billion years lol how the fook did they measure that? Carbon dating? Pottasium argon dating? How can you beleive this when theres nothing to calibrate to this timeframe? Could you explain your understanding of this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feckAny thing is possible in 4 billion years and a bit of luck good and bad. Mate think about 4 billion years lol how the fook did they measure that? Carbon dating? Pottasium argon dating? How can you beleive this when theres nothing to calibrate to this timeframe? Could you explain your understanding of this? The bible thinks the earth is 6000yrs old is that right Francie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feckAny thing is possible in 4 billion years and a bit of luck good and bad.Mate think about 4 billion years lol how the fook did they measure that? Carbon dating? Pottasium argon dating?How can you beleive this when theres nothing to calibrate to this timeframe? Could you explain your understanding of this? The bible thinks the earth is 6000yrs old is that right Francie When you add up the geneology of the people its around 6000 years old, could be few thousand more but definatley not millions or billions. Carbon dating only work for few thousand years cause thats all they can calibrate it too, why none of these folks understand this i dont know, maybe there just ignoring it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Everyone knows you CANT carbon date rocks or fossils its a guranteed fact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dave88 1,565 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Yeah..Both weigh the same! Information cannot be measured with scales therefore it is not physical and therefore must exist first before the physical can be created. it's been estimated that the internet weighs about the same as a medium-sized egg. The weight of all the electrons in motion that make up the internet at any one moment is equivalent to 50 grams, So if someone snorted it would they end up brainy as feckAny thing is possible in 4 billion years and a bit of luck good and bad.Mate think about 4 billion years lol how the fook did they measure that? Carbon dating? Pottasium argon dating?How can you beleive this when theres nothing to calibrate to this timeframe? Could you explain your understanding of this? The bible thinks the earth is 6000yrs old is that right FrancieWhen you add up the geneology of the people its around 6000 years old, could be few thousand more but definatley not millions or billions. Carbon dating only work for few thousand years cause thats all they can calibrate it too, why none of these folks understand this i dont know, maybe there just ignoring it? So do you yourself believe that the earth is only 6000 years old? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 But here’s the thing, the dendrochronologic record—last I checked—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. You don’t trust radiometric dating? Fine. Buy a magnifying class and a box of Twinkies and visit a dendro lab. Tree rings form a unique fingerprint as trees across a region are exposed to similar conditions. For this reason, overlapping ring patterns from living, dead, and fossilized trees can be lined up to build continuous series stretching back through thousands and thousands of years. 12,000 and counting. No fancy science required. The grand canyon. Those lines are sedimentation lines that form 40 major layers spanning 2 billion years of deposition. Okay, you might need a degree in geology to tell desert sand deposition from silt and to follow the series around the West to account for disconformities, but even a casual, unbiased evaluation will convince you utterly of two things: 1) The canyon was laid down by erosion through ancient sediments, not cut by any flood, and 2) those sediments were laid down over many, many, many millions of years. And that’s just scratching the surface, so to speak. Even the Pope knows the Earth is 4.54 billion years old. When you accept it and start studying the data, you’ll discover something important. Many of those loudly proclaiming a young Earth these days must unavoidably understand how far their claims are from what the Earth really tells us—but they keep on saying it anyway, and selling books and lecture tickets. I wonder why they would do that? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Look at the sediment lines here. They take a very long time to form. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 But heres the thing, the dendrochronologic recordlast I checkednow goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. You dont trust radiometric dating? Fine. Buy a magnifying class and a box of Twinkies and visit a dendro lab. Tree rings form a unique fingerprint as trees across a region are exposed to similar conditions. For this reason, overlapping ring patterns from living, dead, and fossilized trees can be lined up to build continuous series stretching back through thousands and thousands of years. 12,000 and counting. No fancy science required. The grand canyon. Those lines are sedimentation lines that form 40 major layers spanning 2 billion years of deposition. Okay, you might need a degree in geology to tell desert sand deposition from silt and to follow the series around the West to account for disconformities, but even a casual, unbiased evaluation will convince you utterly of two things: 1) The canyon was laid down by erosion through ancient sediments, not cut by any flood, and 2) those sediments were laid down over many, many, many millions of years. And thats just scratching the surface, so to speak. Even the Pope knows the Earth is 4.54 billion years old. When you accept it and start studying the data, youll discover something important. Many of those loudly proclaiming a young Earth these days must unavoidably understand how far their claims are from what the Earth really tells usbut they keep on saying it anyway, and selling books and lecture tickets. I wonder why they would do that? Dendochronology can be trusted because it can be tested an verified, but not overlapping mate. The rest of your post is assumptions an guesswork, its not that i dont trust carbon dating its a scientific fact you cant date fossils or rocks mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted April 29, 2017 Report Share Posted April 29, 2017 Look at the sediment lines here. They take a very long time to form. main-qimg-0c947554d1a64ecf1619487d4a49ee79-c.jpg Thats your opinion mate get a jar fill it with sand or whatever an some water give it a shake an youl see the different layers form very quickly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.