Jump to content

Packham Nicked


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

There are ways and there are ways. Packham appears to have little control over his actions, driven by inner prejudice and anger. Conservation is everyones responsibility not just a self-centred, popu

Definitely true but I think hunters should be the front line conservationists ..when a species declines by 96% in a few years like the turtle dove then it's down to hunters to say right there of the

I wish I knew he was in Malta ...I wanted to put a walkytalky behind his freezer and make whimpering noises in the dead of night

Animals rights organisations will portray him as some kind of noble Lone Ranger, fighting the good fight for all the right reasons..........if however it was lurcher owners caught taking a roe deer our own CA would be out in public condemning them in the strongest possible terms and distancing them selves from all such people.

 

And that's why the antis are winning !

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Packham knows what goes on in Malta and Gozo and he also knows it is banned , have any of you seen the Butts facing out to sea ? even the locals do not like what is going on .Right or wrong he got off is arse and tried to make it public and for that he needs a pat on the back for trying ......or do you think he should have sat on his arse and called people names from the safety of his keyboard.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Packham knows what goes on in Malta and Gozo and he also knows it is banned , have any of you seen the Butts facing out to sea ? even the locals do not like what is going on .Right or wrong he got off is arse and tried to make it public and for that he needs a pat on the back for trying ......or do you think he should have sat on his arse and called people names from the safety of his keyboard.

 

 

Whoosh, staight over your head ain't it?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

An argument from ignorance ie is a false dichotomy. In the case of a rapidly falling population number such as turtle doves it lacks the introduction of prior plausibility. I.e. hunting may well have a very small impact on populations but one would need to consider the common sense idea that even a small impact at a critical point may well have a much bigger long term effect.

In this case he reasons are multiple although reduction in food availability through changes in farming practices and the trichomonosis parasite are the likely major causes, both of which are difficult to alter. So addressing areas, such as trapping/shooting on migration, are viable and have prior plausibility ie less stress/disturbance on migration likely increasing success rates etc. Plus small populations are more heavily impacted by smaller number reductions than larger populations ie killing one hundred of a population of a million will have little impact but do the same with a population of a 1000………

 

 

As I have said, I have made no attempt to comment on this specific situation. Simply how these issues should be approached.

 

If the above bold text is determined to be reasonable then the answer to my question of effect isn't as you suggest that hunting has a small impact. If it is, then someone hasn't been comprehensive enough in their research and when interrogated by the scientific community would be pulled up on it immediately.

 

Can I just make it clear one more time, that I am not defending, promoting or attacking the legality of Maltese hunting. Just how I believe these issues should be approached.

 

Sandy, your insight on this specific issue is interesting and I'd like to read more of it, it expands on what Beast said previously. It enables people to make a more informed judgement.

 

Delving deep in my memories think i remember a paper linking trichomonosis to the demise of the passenger pigeon, hunting was blamed but would have been unlikely to be the only cause, rather the straw and donkey scenario. The turtle dove may well end up following it as a victim of the on-going anthropocene extinction, habitat destruction and disease bringing number low enough to reduce breeding viability then hunting bringing the demise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i bet half the fxckers on this thread don't even feed the birds thru the bad time.s,good on ya packem..

And yours

 

Who needs enemies eh?

Byron packham said all cancer research money should stop an be redirected to animals ffs you still gona give him a good on ya?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Packham knows what goes on in Malta and Gozo and he also knows it is banned , have any of you seen the Butts facing out to sea ? even the locals do not like what is going on .Right or wrong he got off is arse and tried to make it public and for that he needs a pat on the back for trying ......or do you think he should have sat on his arse and called people names from the safety of his keyboard.

Read above post mick, he deserves a bullet nevermind a pat mate.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this earlier on the news. Bloke is an absolute first class prick and wants a fooking kicking, obnoxious arrgant twat he is - but i agree with him on shooting BoP and rare birds in Malta. Its just not on.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...