Lidle Find

[byron 1,190]

one was living on the marshes near me..forty odd years ago..escapee from local zoo.. there was also a escapee flamingo..

[TOMO 26,902]

well ,,I don't know about others sighting's. and I allways believed about hounds not being amongst one,and thought a load of bollocks etc..but,like iv'e said before on here, i have seen two ,with witnesses.so what did we see?? roe/muntjac..I can see these everyday without fail,, both sighting's being [ran straight across in front of us].one whilst driving [dalby hill Lincolnshire] and other on foot..not five hundred yards from were I live..so the argument rages eh..i know what iv'e seen and I'm not bothered about others views..

thanks..

 

I think you are bothered,,,,its the second time on this thread you have mentioned seeing them...

[TOMO 26,902]

 

Anyone else ever seen wild wallabies in the UK? There was a small colony of them in Derbyshire (I think) that had escaped from a zoo. I saw them as a kid with Scouts.

 

If that can happen I wouldn't be surprised the same thing could have happened with big cats.

Theres some great footage of youtube showing wallabies all over the UK,crystal clear film leaving no boudt whatsoever they live,survive maybe even thrive in the UK,sadly no such irrefutable evidence of cats,any grainy long distance or shaky footage/pics is always a little ambiguous.

 

 

any body ever go to whippsnade wildlife park,,,near luton,,,,,i was there quite regular a few years ago,,,,,,where you drive in there is just a barrier like on a car park,,,no cattle grid or anything,,loads of wallaby in there,,,,and i dare say loads round about,,,,i bet theres a few other bits and bobs local ,,possibly Mara as well.....incidently i know someone that has had a Mara with a dog ,,,,but somewhere else in the country

[mackem 27,713]

Tigers and a snow leopard in Bhutan,no 5 grand cameras,no fancy tweaking of footage,just easily available cameras and footage viewed in the field,if cats are in the UK this is the proof that's beyond a shadow of a doubt.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=gordon+buchanan+tigers+in+bhutan+footage&view=detail&mid=7CF262F0CA6ED1A3B8F37CF262F0CA6ED1A3B8F3&FORM=VIRE

[Greyman 29,146]

This is the sort of proof positive that's irrefutable,we now know wallabies survive in the UK,footage taken I presume on a phone camera.

ah the elusive wallaby yes, I can tell the difference between a cat and a fox mate on my cameras but out of hundreds of fox shots I get half may be good and usable were as if I had hundreds of pictures of cats I may be able to pic a few good ones out, I think the wallaby actually looked like a dog in a suit and how many people would want to be that close to a leopardr how many leopards would come that close to a human it's starting to go a bit silly again now so I,ll just wait for the socks verdict as will everyone else have to cheers

[DogMan85 722]

 

This is the sort of proof positive that's irrefutable,we now know wallabies survive in the UK,footage taken I presume on a phone camera.

ah the elusive wallaby yes, I can tell the difference between a cat and a fox mate on my cameras but out of hundreds of fox shots I get half may be good and usable were as if I had hundreds of pictures of cats I may be able to pic a few good ones out, I think the wallaby actually looked like a dog in a suit and how many people would want to be that close to a leopardr how many leopards would come that close to a human it's starting to go a bit silly again now so I,ll just wait for the socks verdict as will everyone else have to cheers

If it was a Leopard that had been likely raised by humans then there would be a very good chance they would come that close.

[EDDIE B 3,166]

This is the sort of proof positive that's irrefutable,we now know wallabies survive in the UK,footage taken I presume on a phone camera.

Lads anyone know how high you'd need to set the snare for that lad? Lol

[mackem 27,713]

 

This is the sort of proof positive that's irrefutable,we now know wallabies survive in the UK,footage taken I presume on a phone camera.

ah the elusive wallaby yes, I can tell the difference between a cat and a fox mate on my cameras but out of hundreds of fox shots I get half may be good and usable were as if I had hundreds of pictures of cats I may be able to pic a few good ones out, I think the wallaby actually looked like a dog in a suit and how many people would want to be that close to a leopardr how many leopards would come that close to a human it's starting to go a bit silly again now

 

I never ridiculed you,never said I disbelieved what you think you saw,i just raised a few pertinent pointers,now your getting defensive saying its getting silly,i know a bit about trail cams,i have a few,so I pointed out Gordon buchanan didn't edit footage or stick in stock film fillers that's all,even a partial animal picture is fairly identifiable if filmed at night on a trail cam,moreso a spotted leopard,what else in the UK countryside can it be mistaken for?

[DogMan85 722]

You'd think the folk trying to prove their existence woukd get some decent HD cameras and do their thing.

[mackem 27,713]

You'd think the folk trying to prove their existence woukd get some decent HD cameras and do their thing.

A halfway decent trail-cam nowadays will give you 1080 and 12mp,thats damned good quality,doesnt deteriorate to a blurry screen at night.

[TOMO 26,902]

uk big cat society official camera..

 

[TOMO 26,902]

and trail cam,,,,,sorry couldnt resist..

 

[DogMan85 722]

uk big cat society official camera..

 

And they all walk around with this camera phone, 00000000000.1 MP......

Edited April 27, 2017 by DogMan85

[Greyman 29,146]

 

 

This is the sort of proof positive that's irrefutable,we now know wallabies survive in the UK,footage taken I presume on a phone camera.

 

ah the elusive wallaby yes, I can tell the difference between a cat and a fox mate on my cameras but out of hundreds of fox shots I get half may be good and usable were as if I had hundreds of pictures of cats I may be able to pic a few good ones out, I think the wallaby actually looked like a dog in a suit and how many people would want to be that close to a leopardr how many leopards would come that close to a human it's starting to go a bit silly again now

I never ridiculed you,never said I disbelieved what you think you saw,i just raised a few pertinent pointers,now your getting defensive saying its getting silly,i know a bit about trail cams,i have a few,so I pointed out Gordon buchanan didn't edit footage or stick in stock film fillers that's all,even a partial animal picture is fairly identifiable if filmed at night on a trail cam,moreso a spotted leopard,what else in the UK countryside can it be mistaken for?

mate your just covering old ground that's been done pages ago I have met these people that make these programmes I know how much it all costs and the time they take getting the footage and yes Gordon bucananans gear is edited as part of the show I love his work but what you get to see is not what happens in real life, a famous bit of tv footage you may have seen is Jaguars that come to the beach every year to eat the turtles that nest there, despite the fact the locals all new when and were they arrived every year it still took the film crew two weeks and over twenty grand to catch a couple of minutes of film, so unless you are working in the wildlife film department you are not seeing unedited uncut footage I have absolutely hundreds of useless shots of animals ears asses and tails that I spend half my life deleting from sd cards some of them if you wanted inconclusive evidence you could use like a really long black tail about two and a half foot above the ground that I caught when something ran past my camera but it's inconclusive will always be so I deleted it, also may I suggest you look up melonistic cats as it makes them black I have only ever seen one picture of a spotted leopard all the rest are melonistic like the one I am starting to regret putting up at the beginning, I,m not being self defensive just gets a bit tiring going over and over the same ground everytime someone else joins in without reading the previous million pages that I have attempted to write in answer to the questions, I don't for one second profess to have all the answers it's just something I enjoy doing I,m not a liar don't really need to justify what I do or what photos I chose to show or keep myself I never started the thread and all I,ve done is tried answering people to the best of my knowledge so yes for me it is getting a bit silly, I will gladly attempt to answer anyone with a genuine question, but I really don't need to sit here defending my integrity or even the footage on my cams as I,ve said I will show it to socks next week as required by the people on here and he can tell you if I have an out of focus fox at 300 yards distance or what I think I have is the real deal, it's really that simple and I certainly don't need people telling me how easy it is for people on telly on a fantastic wage using equipment that cost more than my house to get a photo in a place they know the animal lives it's a stupid comparison hence my slightly prickly answers

[Greyman 29,146]

 

 

You'd think the folk trying to prove their existence woukd get some decent HD cameras and do their thing.

 

A halfway decent trail-cam nowadays will give you 1080 and 12mp,thats damned good quality,doesnt deteriorate to a blurry screen at night.

then maybe you should get it out the box stop quoting what it says on the label and flood us with your fantastic footage, if I wanted a fox case would be closed cheers